- Oct 1, 2015
- 1,456
- 3,240
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
No rain in Melbourne on Sunday. It’s not a question of if Freo will win but a question of how much by.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Heard this story beforeNo rain in Melbourne on Sunday. It’s not a question of if Freo will win but a question of how much by.
Just start with an Irish coffee instead.Morning games always worry me though. Don’t have the stats on it but can’t remember the last time I’ve cracked a morning beer to watch the game and woken up bright, chirpy and happy on a Monday !!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Be interesting to see how it looks once final teams are announced.These demographics are staggering for both teams. Us because we're still too young to be a serious team. The Tigers because I don't think I've even seen 15 under 50 games.
View attachment 1977782
You obviously haven’t been Freo-ing for too long my friend?No rain in Melbourne on Sunday. It’s not a question of if Freo will win but a question of how much by.
Round 1 '22 we had 13 and Adelaide had 14 and that was with 22, rather than 23. But yeah, just random clicking on Footywire I can't find any 15's without going back to early GWS.These demographics are staggering for both teams. Us because we're still too young to be a serious team. The Tigers because I don't think I've even seen 15 under 50 games.
View attachment 1977782
We still have more with less than 100 games though, staggeringThese demographics are staggering for both teams. Us because we're still too young to be a serious team. The Tigers because I don't think I've even seen 15 under 50 games.
View attachment 1977782
Crazy how experienced our younger guys are though. That 50-99 crew is building nicely.These demographics are staggering for both teams. Us because we're still too young to be a serious team. The Tigers because I don't think I've even seen 15 under 50 games.
View attachment 1977782
The continued loss of established role players (and Cerra) over the last 3 years has really set back our progression into a more experienced team, but I think it may deliver a better side in the long run.Crazy how experienced our younger guys are though. That 50-99 crew is building nicely.
Yes losing a few of them hurt us short term but its balanced us out nicely. I agree with you that we look likely to be a better side now.The continued loss of established role players (and Cerra) over the last 3 years has really set back our progression into a more experienced team, but I think it may deliver a better side in the long run.
Take Melbourne for instance they might have got more out of their time of the top if their bottom 6 or 8 players were be better.
Karl is the same height as Josh Draper ?I’d prefer to bring Worner over Hughes if Draper doesn’t make it. Same height, and Worner looked good in the one game he played and his rebound is so much more potent
HughesKarl is the same height as Josh Draper ?
Same as HughesKarl is the same height as Josh Draper ?
Yeah nah-Draper 197 both Hughes and Worner 188cm.Same as Hughes
Are you sleighting him here ?Treacy, Jackson, Voss, Amiss up front?
I think Richmond are already going to try and run us off our feet but until I've seen more of Voss taking contested marks instead of just getting his arms up to the ball or him covering a lot of ground, I wouldn't want to railroad our style that much just yet.
20+ year member but always optimistic.You obviously haven’t been Freo-ing for too long my friend?
We have never ever earned the right to think we can show up for a routine win over anyone in this comp, literally ever.
Thanks for proving me rightYeah nah-Draper 197 both Hughes and Worner 188cm.
Davies 196(with hat 198)
Murphy handy at 200cm
These demographics are staggering for both teams. Us because we're still too young to be a serious team. The Tigers because I don't think I've even seen 15 under 50 games.
View attachment 1977782
No current season stats available