Banter RDT 170 - The Joyce McKinney Experience

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's actually why I brought him up, I watched the first 6 seasons years back and have got back into it. It's a brainlessly funny enough distraction for me.

Seinfeld on crack seems like a good description for it.

Characters can be hard to like at times.
 
Seinfeld on crack seems like a good description for it.

Characters can be hard to like at times.

Well yeah they're all massively unrelatable dicks really. It's like watching a shit show without any moral regret. Except for their black-face stuff - I remember the Lethal Weapon remake stuff from years back but apparently there's more episodes than that that have been removed accordingly.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

And people say that news.com is just tabloid trash. Pfft.


‘I’ve had a penis on my arm for six years’

Dad has penis transplanted from his arm.

A British dad was left with a replacement penis attached to his arm for six years after his original appendage fell off in the toilet.

Looking at how he now cracks a fat:

Cyberdyne Systems T-001

It's begun.
 
On a related matter what's people's thoughts on 'Its Always Sunny in Philadelphia'

Has its moments, but surprised it lasted 15 seasons
I'd only ever seen the odd episode here and there until it got included on Disney +. I've watched the first 4 seasons over the last couple of weeks and have found it pretty consistently funny.
 
Always Sunny you are supposed to hate the main characters though. That's the entire point, they are terrible people doing terrible things in a attempt to get ahead of each other and the secondary characters.

I love the show, last few seasons have been a bit hit and miss I think because they have tried to link a bit too much together (the entire Ireland trip is a bit of a waste) and the style is better suited to standalone episodes, namely because nearly every episode involves crime and the characters would all have been arrested by now if it was a continuous story.

You can't tell me the "Reynolds vs Reynolds: The Cereal Defence" isn't the greatest episode of comedy ever.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

United had no choice really. With a local club as the basis of their identity they had too small of a supporter base and too large a pool of rival fans who would never support them as the Tigers. Rebranding and cutting ties was the only way for them to survive.
A second team in Melbourne also made total sense for the league and the fans.

I hate both of them too though. And Sydney for that matter. But they are all necessary evils.
 
United had no choice really. With a local club as the basis of their identity they had too small of a supporter base and too large a pool of rival fans who would never support them as the Tigers.

In some ways its the same reason why the Power are limited in SA with their fan base.

Too many people hate them from the SANFL magpies, so support the Crows by default
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top