2. Trent Cotchin (West Preston / Northern)
18. Alex Rance (Swan Districts)
51. Dean Putt (Woodend / Calder Cannons)
64. PASS
18. Alex Rance (Swan Districts)
51. Dean Putt (Woodend / Calder Cannons)
64. PASS
Richmond 2007 National Draft
- Thread starter Weaver
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Very happy so far!!
Is Rance a Vic too?
WA and Swan Districts.
Son of Murray Rance ex Eagles player
I'm a very, very happy man, we ranked Putt quite highly and got him, beautiful! But Rance at 18 awsome for us!
- Banned
- #8
STOCKED
I can't believe Rance slipped
We affectivly nabbed two top 10 picks in most peoples phantoms
I can't believe Rance slipped
We affectivly nabbed two top 10 picks in most peoples phantoms
WorthTheWaite
Cancelled
Geez, that's a good effort. I wouldn't pay much attention to where they were ranked in Phantoms, but that's pretty much the top midfield prospect and the top key defender prospect. An unusually good draft from Richmond
omg..
FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!
a GREAT GREAT draft for the tigers.
extremely happy
FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!
a GREAT GREAT draft for the tigers.
extremely happy
can anyone give me a bit of info on this Dean Putt?
_RT_
Community Leader
- Sep 17, 2006
- 47,537
- 93,200
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
- Moderator
- #13
Stoked with who we got with the 3 picks. Now the most important part getting them to play to their potential. Picking up Putt at 51 hopefull means we are not going to bother with Richards in the PSD and may look at one of the kids overlooked today or Collard/Pfeiffer instead.
David3030
Club Legend
Geez, that's a good effort. I wouldn't pay much attention to where they were ranked in Phantoms, but that's pretty much the top midfield prospect and the top key defender prospect. An unusually good draft from Richmond
Whats even more unusual is a Carlton fan actually saying something honest for once
and...
gourdis gaertner bellchambers were overlooked in the draft.
whcih means we cood rookie draft and psd 1 or 2 of them.. best draft ever
gourdis gaertner bellchambers were overlooked in the draft.
whcih means we cood rookie draft and psd 1 or 2 of them.. best draft ever
- Banned
- #17
In theory...
However we only have one PSD available, unless we can still delist players in which we should delist Moore because we got Rance.
Besides I still think we will take Guy Richards at pick 1. Then by the time the rookie draft comes around, most teams would have already used there PSD picks on Bellchambers, gourdis, etc.
Best possible outcome would be if we take Bellchambers at PSD #1 knowing that we have Simmonds, Pattison, Graham and Putt on our list.
Great day for the tiges,finally we can believe Miller when he claims "we didn't expect him (Rance) to last that long,we are rapt"
- Banned
- #19
Im Stoked!
Very happy for the Tiges and hope they live up to their potential because on paper that draft looks awesome.
Rance slipped because he is slow. Its that simple.
Being Slow and playing FB as pretty much ur only positions, means big trouble IMO.
Being Slow and playing FB as pretty much ur only positions, means big trouble IMO.
Oh how wrong u are! Rance is very deceptivley quick, has great rebounding ability from defensive 50. Rance will play FB and CHB and be a very good player.
all of a sudden a future backline for the tiges looks pretty good with Thirsty Rance and even McGuane who is coming along nicely.
throw in Bowden (2xAA Defender), Polak, King etc etc
When it settles and the players get to know eachother it will be very solid!
I'd be a bit surprised (and disappointed) if we took Richards now. Simmonds, Pattison, Graham and Putt as genuine ruck options with the possibility of picking up another long term ruckman in Bellchambers if we want to. Surely 4 ruckmen on a list of 38 is enough, and if you're going to go for more than that then surely you don't need another mid-twenties underachiever type over a kid who was rated as a 2nd round chance and has 12-13 years ahead of him (Bellchambers).
Gaertner is too young to be rookied, so we'd need to take him in the PSD if at all. I think we have an "embarrasment of riches" (relatively)to take at PSD 1 and Rookie 1. Gourdis, Bellchambers, Gaertner, Petrenko, Pfeiffer, Al Neville etc. Not Richards now. Please not Richards.
Gaertner is too young to be rookied, so we'd need to take him in the PSD if at all. I think we have an "embarrasment of riches" (relatively)to take at PSD 1 and Rookie 1. Gourdis, Bellchambers, Gaertner, Petrenko, Pfeiffer, Al Neville etc. Not Richards now. Please not Richards.
3.1ish for 20m. Hmmmmmmm
Just saw some highlights on Cotchin. Kevin Sheahan said his kicking as not just good but extremely rare.
Our recruiter Derek Hine said he'd have taken him at 1.
Looks a gun.
Our recruiter Derek Hine said he'd have taken him at 1.
Looks a gun.
Similar threads
- Locked
