Good club to be at as a defender, as its where the ball most often is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Throw in McGinnity as wellI'd be a bit surprised (and disappointed) if we took Richards now. Simmonds, Pattison, Graham and Putt as genuine ruck options with the possibility of picking up another long term ruckman in Bellchambers if we want to. Surely 4 ruckmen on a list of 38 is enough, and if you're going to go for more than that then surely you don't need another mid-twenties underachiever type over a kid who was rated as a 2nd round chance and has 12-13 years ahead of him (Bellchambers).
Gaertner is too young to be rookied, so we'd need to take him in the PSD if at all. I think we have an "embarrasment of riches" (relatively)to take at PSD 1 and Rookie 1. Gourdis, Bellchambers, Gaertner, Petrenko, Pfeiffer, Al Neville etc. Not Richards now. Please not Richards.
Why did Rance "slip" to pick 18 in a weak draft if he's so good?STOCKED
I can't believe Rance slipped
We affectivly nabbed two top 10 picks in most peoples phantoms
Good club to be at as a defender, as its where the ball most often is.
I'm rapt we got Browne and Armfield who we rated, but I'm not expecting both to become players.
Sigh Very very intelligent response, pretty sure its a Draft and Trading forum u peanut.
This draft was weak in the sense that each player after about pick 2 comes with question marks. Rance has weaknesses just like about 60 of the other draftees taken today. Rances weakness is his speed and wether he might get chopped up by quick forwards. His kicking isnt anything special in terms of distance. Nice dinky little kick but lacks any real penetration over long distances.
BF consensus means squat in terms of where the players are ranked by recruiting managers. People need to really remember that.
there is no way richards will end up at punt road not if the players have anything to do with itStoked with who we got with the 3 picks. Now the most important part getting them to play to their potential. Picking up Putt at 51 hopefull means we are not going to bother with Richards in the PSD and may look at one of the kids overlooked today or Collard/Pfeiffer instead.
For those who say 3.01 over 20 is not fast should take a look at the results of some of the other highly rated key position players
Darcy Daniher 3.07
Matthew Kreuzer 3.11
Lachlan Henderson 3.14
Matthew Lobbe 3.11
Ben McEvoy 3.28
Andy Otten 3.06
Scott Simpson 3.16
And then theres the mids
Patrick Veszpremi 3.02
Callan Ward 3.03
Ashley Arrowsmith 3.16
Addam Maric 3.07
Scott Selwood 3.02
I think you get my point, Rance is far from slow
Quicker than midfielders Veszpremi and Ward and Selwood. I reckon Rance will be ok. Hes not slow, the Hawks supporters are upset coz they needed a full back like Rance but there recruiters picked Rioli instead.
Quicker than midfielders Veszpremi and Ward and Selwood. I reckon Rance will be ok. Hes not slow, the Hawks supporters are upset coz they needed a full back like Rance but there recruiters picked Rioli instead.
I think its funny how everybody rates a guy like Rance in there top 10 until Richmond pick them up and then there hacks. Give our recruiters some credit. We have done well over the last couple of years with Francis Jackson in charge and have been able to recruit some absolute steals like Conners at 60 last year (If you have seen him play you will know what i mean)
Exactly, if the Hawks had of picked him up where we did they would be saying the same thing, same for some of the ******* Carlton supporters, just cause you didn't get him doesn't mean he is crap.I think its funny how everybody rates a guy like Rance in there top 10 until Richmond pick them up and then there hacks. Give our recruiters some credit. We have done well over the last couple of years with Francis Jackson in charge and have been able to recruit some absolute steals like Conners at 60 last year (If you have seen him play you will know what i mean)
yeh exactly good post mate , .....cause half of em are just sore losers, or didnt get rance or are just tossers who dont know anything bout footy,
Rance slipped because he is slow. Its that simple.
Being Slow and playing FB as pretty much ur only positions, means big trouble IMO.
Glen Waverley Weight Watchers until Xmas then onto Hawthorn.
More like Biggest Loser.
The Hawks picked an out and out dud with the eleventh pick in the draft.Quicker than midfielders Veszpremi and Ward and Selwood. I reckon Rance will be ok. Hes not slow, the Hawks supporters are upset coz they needed a full back like Rance but there recruiters picked Rioli instead.