- Banned
- #51
once again no adams ??????????????????????????Did you miss round 1?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
once again no adams ??????????????????????????Did you miss round 1?
there are 13 players ahead of him in the coaches votesonce again no adams ??????????????????????????
Fxxkin rubbish ffsthere are 13 players ahead of him in the coaches votes
So no Adams isn't near the ******* AA team at this stage. let it go!
Jiath has polled in both games. 1 in round 1 and 4 in round 2.If it were based on the first two games only (which of course we know it isn't) the "locks" would most logically be players that have polled coaches votes in each of the games (*indicates only ones to poll votes in a losing side, which could make them even lockier locks):
Martin (ric)
Lambert (ric)
Riewoldt (ric)
*Moore (col)
Macrae (wb)
*Brayshaw (fre)
Oliver (mel)
*Walker (ade)
*Keays (ade)
Gulden (syd)
Heeney (syd)
Houston (port)
Boak (port)
Wines (por)
*Lukosius (gc)
*Sheed (wce)
That's 16 locks. Throw in your ruckman and small forward of choice, plus a bit of outside run and another defender. Easy.
My bad, 17 locksJiath has polled in both games. 1 in round 1 and 4 in round 2.
Once again, did you see round 1? Lmfaoonce again no adams ??????????????????????????
Short should have been AA, He won our B&F in a Premiership year It seems Dusty only gets the credit at Richmond. I looked at Geelong & Hawks when they were winning flags and how much players they had in the team it's bit disrespectful.Bailey Williams and Jayden Short were both not far off AA selection last year, and have both had very solid starts to this season. Can definitely see one of them making the side this year based on the improvements we've been seeing from both.
As for Dogs inclusions, Macrae is easily in the AA side so far. Bailey Smith (wing) and Bont have each had a BOG performance along with another very good game each and would be in contention so far.
I like this thought patternIf it were based on the first two games only (which of course we know it isn't) the "locks" would most logically be players that have polled coaches votes in each of the games (*indicates only ones to poll votes in a losing side, which could make them even lockier locks):
Martin (ric)
Lambert (ric)
Riewoldt (ric)
*Moore (col)
Macrae (wb)
*Brayshaw (fre)
Oliver (mel)
*Walker (ade)
*Keays (ade)
Gulden (syd)
Heeney (syd)
Houston (port)
Boak (port)
Wines (por)
*Lukosius (gc)
*Sheed (wce)
That's 16 locks. Throw in your ruckman and small forward of choice, plus a bit of outside run and another defender. Easy.
Yeah he's definitely better than Nathan Vardy.Bailey Williams is so underrated in these threads.
Helmet head or Glass jaw should doI can't tell if people mean Angus or Andrew Brayshaw. Can they please put "A. Brayshaw" just to clarify.
FB: Steven May - Dougal Howard - Jordan Ridley
HB: Dan Houston - Darcy Moore - Shannon Hurn
C: Andrew Brayshaw - Clayton Oliver - Bailey Smith
HF: Dustin Martin - Taylor Walker - Zak Butters
F: Orazio Fantasia - Jack Riewoldt - Errol Gulden
R: Nic Naitanui - Travis Boak - Jack Macrae
Int: Jake Lloyd - Tom Mitchell - Tim Kelly - Marcus Bontempelli
And round 1 where he was unanimous BOG by the coaches?Anyone who has Tom "stat padder" Mitchell in clearly does not watch the games. 37 possessions against the Tigers, 170m gained (a whopping 4.6m gained per possession), 0 coaches votes, completely irrelevant.
A good Supercoach score does not mean that he actually did anything on the day.
Definitely a great young player for you guysQuaynor.