Probably right. Nicks doesn't seem the type to rest players. (not for half a season anyway)Exactly, and he'd play 100% of games, just like this season where people were saying that he would play 50% of the games.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Probably right. Nicks doesn't seem the type to rest players. (not for half a season anyway)Exactly, and he'd play 100% of games, just like this season where people were saying that he would play 50% of the games.
No chance. His comments yesterday is he doesn’t want a rest and wants to play on unless we kick him outSloaney, fabulous Crows man, it's clearly time.
Play your guts out in your 250th, then do the right thing and tell the club to select you sparsely, or finish the season developing young guys in the reserves, then be the true team man you've been, and graciously retire.
Be one of the few AFL players to man up and make the call.
No chance. His comments yesterday is he doesn’t want a rest and wants to play on unless we kick him out
Just checked Facebook, give him 2 years!!Would love for us to do just that, and to finally end this old guard culture of leveraging the club in the media. Walker, Crouch, and Sloane all guilty of it in the last few years. At least Tex's form has earned his spot.
Just on that, Tex is never allowed to retire. Put him in a wheelchair if necessary. He'd still be good for a couple of goals a game.Would love for us to do just that, and to finally end this old guard culture of leveraging the club in the media. Walker, Crouch, and Sloane all guilty of it in the last few years. At least Tex's form has earned his spot.
Contrast to Dougie being told he's retiring.Would love for us to do just that, and to finally end this old guard culture of leveraging the club in the media. Walker, Crouch, and Sloane all guilty of it in the last few years. At least Tex's form has earned his spot.
One and a half years as an A grade player in the league, history shows he wasn't a good enough 'star' to win the cup when the team relied on him.I'm not sure how people rate his career as an A grader. In between B- to B for me.
Where did I ever say he wasn't selfish? He has also been selfless at times. I'm not arguing that his time isn't up, in fact I believe this should be his last season. All I'm saying is that the disrespect in here towards a club champion - particularly leading into his 250th game - is disgusting.So Sloane is talking up how in some games he is being managed and playing limited minutes. So when rotations are key, his management has effectively meant others are picking up his slack during the game. This instead of doing what most players at his age do and miss a game which also gives others chances.
How is this not a selfish approach? jenny61_99
So what is the criticism of this club champion? That his form is poor, the game has gone past him, he should retire gracefully rather than make the club sack him and he’s selfish. Seems you agree with all of that, so it’s okay to think it but not post it? Odd take for a football forum.Where did I ever say he wasn't selfish? He has also been selfless at times. I'm not arguing that his time isn't up, in fact I believe this should be his last season. All I'm saying is that the disrespect in here towards a club champion - particularly leading into his 250th game - is disgusting.
I just think there are ways, and ways of posting about Club Champions. Read the selection thread (and some in here too) and it's pretty bloody awful.So what is the criticism of this club champion? That his form is poor, the game has gone past him, he should retire gracefully rather than make the club sack him and he’s selfish. Seems you agree with all of that, so it’s okay to think it but not post it? Odd take for a football forum.
Yes but if that club champion is selfish and whose performances are hurting the team, then do you really expect him to be treated the same way as a champion who knows his time is up and puts the club first?I just think there are ways, and ways of posting about Club Champions. Read the selection thread (and some in here too) and it's pretty bloody awful.
He looked out for himself and played the club like a fiddle to get a massive contract.
If your manager doesn't get you the best deal possible that you were ok with, it might be time to get a new manager. You can't have issues with that contract if both sides are happy. The AFC had a choice.Hahahhaha stuck around to get paid an elite level contract while providing a rookie level of performance. What a selfless hero woweee. Brave husband. Super Soldier
Edit:
He looked out for himself and played the club like a fiddle to get a massive contract. Good on him, but he is no selfless warrior for the club.
How?
I dont think he is selfish either, I agree he needs to do whats best for him.I don’t think he’s selfish, or at least, anymore selfish than he should be. Every player has the right to squeeze as much money out of their short career as they can.
It’s up to clubs to resist it.
Some lucky clubs will have players take less than they are worth in the interests of team success, but no player should be expected to do that.
He’s been a very good player for us, stuck with us to the end (well paid, I know), and deserves respect. That doesn’t mean we can’t bellyache about his performance, or about the club picking him when he shouldn’t be picked, or worrying about him getting a new deal.
Respected =/= beyond criticism.
I dont think he is selfish either, I agree he needs to do whats best for him.
However, it will be the Crows that I will be frustrated at, if they give him another contract to play on. Sloane is cooked as a player.
Sloane benefited from the fact that Danger had left to go back to Victoria at the same time as his new contract was coming up, so naturally he got much more than what he should have for a player of his quality.