Round 11 discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

I hope Stantons score is the one that doesn't count for my team

19 playing so I doubt it with Thurlow/ Kerridge/ Nicolls types
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Is that a dig at me or...?

Edit: I don't actually have him FWIW.

No mate, just looking at everyone's sub-2K scores for the bye rounds.... If someone picked a KPF who had a breakout/matchwinning game, you could get a huge edge...
 
No mate, just looking at everyone's sub-2K scores for the bye rounds.... If someone picked a KPF who had a breakout/matchwinning game, you could get a huge edge...
Oh right, sorry dude. But sub-2k? I'll be lucky to get 1700, haha. I only have 17 playing.
 
Oh right, sorry dude. But sub-2k? I'll be lucky to get 1700, haha. I only have 17 playing.

No worries. I've got 19 to choose from, but my list shows 20 playing - hoping Vardy is a late out for the Cats and Blicavs comes in to give me the full squad to choose from.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yes, any reason for his score? And Stanton's excuse?

On Stanton, I don't have him but have watched him closely all year. I had been impressed with how he has handled the tag this year with his inside game improving a lot. He scored well on Crowley earlier on in the year which is no mean feat.

Tonight he spent a lot of time outside like he usually does but he also spent time forward and seemed to spend less time on the inside. It's a worry because of how he dropped off last year but I wouldn't be giving up on him yet.

It should also be noted that Watson couldn't get near it either so Carlton's mids did really well.
 
346/4

Very average start. With 20 players playing Hibberd 55 might not even count at this stage (very wishful thinking). Hopefully the scores can turn around tomorrow for me.
 
352/5. Worst start ever!!! I'm sooo going to drop in overall ranking, arggghhh!!

Watson Hibberd Stanton all decide to spud it up TOGETHER, thanks guys :mad:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Round 11 discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top