Round 11 trades

[PP34]

Was too busying fixing a family members Supercoach and forgot to bring in Shenton for one of O'Rourke or Acres.

What are my options now in the midfield? Have a donut if I don't do a trade, so I was thinking JKH > Lennon and then Acres/O'Rourke > Mitchell from Port

 

[Test Tickle]

Was too busying fixing a family members Supercoach and forgot to bring in Shenton for one of O'Rourke or Acres.

What are my options now in the midfield? Have a donut if I don't do a trade, so I was thinking JKH > Lennon and then Acres/O'Rourke > Mitchell from Port

you quick to get him as an avatar too

 

[Hack_Watts]

Sleep on it I reckon,

I'm gonna leave it. Langford is solid as a D7 compared to what's out there... A rest against GWS and a BE of 42 is better than any downgrade option out there...

 

[Hack_Watts]

H

Swan out

Oh great , a grand total of SWEET ****-ALL of my opponents have him

Hopefully you had Shenton at M8?

 

[NSWCROW]

H


Hopefully you had Shenton at M8?

Hartung ( Hunter really )

inb4 Hartung sub

Also , nfi why i posted this here

 

[rocker_oz33]

Wow sounds like some carnage happening all over the place.I will go Langford to Jenesch with my second trade spuded the first one with bews really should of gone Lloyd to the wild man.

 

[Krujan]

I'm gonna leave it. Langford is solid as a D7 compared to what's out there... A rest against GWS and a BE of 42 is better than any downgrade option out there...

That's right. Some people saying he was dropped which is not the case. He's just been managed through his first full season. Keep him fresh. He plays an important role in the Hawks team. I may sideways him for a fallen premo later in the season, trades permitting. But not too fussed if he stays as my D7 all year. I'd rather upgrade/downgrade my Mid & Fwd rookies anyway.

 

[Jiska]

I'm gonna leave it. Langford is solid as a D7 compared to what's out there... A rest against GWS and a BE of 42 is better than any downgrade option out there...

I would have loved to keep him but with Big Boy out and Georgiou and Cutler sitting on my bench I couldn't cop two donuts.

 

[Hack_Watts]

I would have loved to keep him but with Big Boy out and Georgiou and Cutler sitting on my bench I couldn't cop two donuts.

Usually a matter of structure!

 

[Jiska]

Usually a matter of structure!

Structure was fine. Couldn't have predicted BOTH Cutler and Langford being dropped in the same week.

 

[Spanish Sahara]

Structure was fine. Couldn't have predicted BOTH Cutler and Langford being dropped in the same week.

Agree. I am copping two donuts with Big Boy and Enright/Cutler and Langford all missing this week.

Decided Swan to Fyfe was a better option for my squad and avoided a 0 there.

With no mid rookies mooing I will need to cash in on Langford (For Polec to Pendles). Hopefully Langdon can earn a bit more $ before I trade him out.

 

[superfraser]

That's right. Some people saying he was dropped which is not the case. He's just been managed through his first full season. Keep him fresh. He plays an important role in the Hawks team. I may sideways him for a fallen premo later in the season, trades permitting. But not too fussed if he stays as my D7 all year. I'd rather upgrade/downgrade my Mid & Fwd rookies anyway.

Ben Bolton said in an article on AFL.com.au that Langford was dropped and "had to work on a couple of things".

Do you have a source re: managing, or is it an assumption?

 

[Pure_Ownage]

Went Langford > Bews and Georgiou > MJohnson, I think with Freo's draw opening up from here on in he is slightly a better option than Hibberd.

 

[Krujan]

Ben Bolton said in an article on AFL.com.au that Langford was dropped and "had to work on a couple of things".

Do you have a source re: managing, or is it an assumption?

I was going off remarks made the last time he was "dropped"

 

[Daniels]

True, but I dont see Tyson having 25+ touches and 2 goals vs PA. I would want a complete team ASAP if sitting 86th overall.

*Hides under rock* GULP!

 

[TurboBreuster]

I have planned the following trade for the past week:

Hampson > Minson

I'm starting to second guess myself and instead go:

S.Lloyd > Mundy/Barlow (via Dusty)

- Bringing in Minson, who's playing Freo (Sandi) leaves Ambrose/C.Cameron in F6.
- Bringining in Barlow/Mundy moves Dusty to F6, but keeps Hampson in R1. If Hampson spuds it, then he'll lose a lot of $.

Go for a higher score this round, but risk Hampson losing value? or stick to my guns, trade in Minson and get a shite score from Cameron/Ambrose?