Which Ruckman?
Goldstein - BRIS, CARL, MELB, GEEL, ADEL, ESS, HAW, COLL
Kreuzer - STK, NM, GC, FREM, WB, RICH, ESS, PORT
Leuenberger - NM, MELB, PORT, STK, RICH, GWS, WB, GEE
Roughead - PORT, WB, ESS, RICH, STK, COLL, NM, SYD
kruze
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Which Ruckman?
Goldstein - BRIS, CARL, MELB, GEEL, ADEL, ESS, HAW, COLL
Kreuzer - STK, NM, GC, FREM, WB, RICH, ESS, PORT
Leuenberger - NM, MELB, PORT, STK, RICH, GWS, WB, GEE
Roughead - PORT, WB, ESS, RICH, STK, COLL, NM, SYD
Franklin > Riewoldt
Swallow > Stanton
Thoughts? I can afford any midfielder. Stanton at a low price is the way I'm leaning towards at the moment.
I want to upgrade JOM to a premium midfielder. I already have Pendles, Stanton, Jack, Jelwood, and Fyfe.
I'm initially thinking JOM > Swan, but are others worried that with the inclusion of Beams back in the Collingwood side, that he'll "steal" points from Swan and Pendles?
Or is JOM > Barlow the better option? I was going to go Fyfe > Barlow at a later stage.
I want to upgrade JOM to a premium midfielder. I already have Pendles, Stanton, Jack, Jelwood, and Fyfe.
I'm initially thinking JOM > Swan, but are others worried that with the inclusion of Beams back in the Collingwood side, that he'll "steal" points from Swan and Pendles?
Or is JOM > Barlow the better option? I was going to go Fyfe > Barlow at a later stage.
Swan dominated with beams last year. And they'll both help each other rack up handballs... That's if beams even comes back in full flight... He might play shittier than a sack of spuds.
Option A
Hoff - N-Roo
Hartlett - Hanley
(Tom Mitchell M6)
Option B
Kane Mitchell - Kieran Jack (Tom Mitchell moved to M7)
Hoff - N-Roo
Option C
Hoff - N-Roo
Staker - Trav Cloke
Changed my mind from trading ellis
I think im going to keep him and he can remain a viable d6/d7 for the future
So
JOM > McBean (swing Zorko to mids)
And finally cuttinf lonergan because he has been injured for ages and I cant handlr a dead spot in my mids any longer
Lonergan > Enright (swing Hartlett to mids)
With Tuck maybe coming in for Vlastuin. Time to let him go.
Taylor, Terlich or Pearce...thoughts? Got a bit more cash to play with than just the trade
Was hoping I get rid of Buddy to get SJ back but that spud has lost too much cash for it to happen, hence Cloke has to go instead. Looking at Cloke's history, he tends to get destroyed by Rutten anyway, but then he has GC and GWS, hope I can have the luxury to bring him back in next week!
Dont mind Gaz putting his feet up for another week also.. would hate to have to bench T.Mitchell vs GWS!
Anyone else jumping (in my case back on) that shaky looking Hanley train?? Need the moral support..
Im getting him in for vlastuin, bargain at that price imo. with rich back looks to be scoring well again.
Huge structural changes at the Lions in the last month enforced by Merrett, Maguire, Brown missing. I'm backing Hanley in as now he doesn't have to go play HF as all 3 of those players are back. Sidenote, Rockliff almost certainly starting in mids with Black and Moloney out.
Those 3 are KPP though.. how does that affect Hanley and his HFF role?
Happy to believe you in saying Hanley will be back to his high-scoring wing/HBF role, but would like to learn more about how those 3 players will affect structures. Someone like Mayes would surely be more suited as a HF over Hanley?
Either way, Im bringing in Hanley anyway. Really like him as a player as well which is a nice bonus.