SSwans2011
Hall of Famer
Reckon Humphrey is just about maxed out. It was beautiful while it lasted.
I like that trade.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reckon Humphrey is just about maxed out. It was beautiful while it lasted.
I hope you kept AshcroftIf I didn’t need to cover Oliver then I would definitely be trading Ashcroft and bringing in Libba.
It’s the fact I need to cover Oliver (and would only be left with 4 trades) that has me hesitant with that approach. Particularly as there the whole Oliver situation has been a shitshow.
Wonder if I went Walsh/Binns what I could get for Ashcroft in 2 weeks. ~470k. Will be able to afford Mills, but a mid/fwd dpp would be better for the side
Kept Ashcroft!I hope you kept Ashcroft
Seems like a necessary trade, do that
Sure didI hope you kept Ashcroft
100% trade.5 trades
150k in bank
Thinking Humpa to Walsh
Hold or make a trade?
Can you get to an Amartey/Flanders?Argh, I'm still spinning around about which "rookie"... Fletcher, Hewett, Cuningham... someone else?
Fletcher looks a player, but is young, in a strong side.... surely gets squeezed.
Hewett is in a dogshit side so will barely score, but is talented so should play.
Cuningham... DPP.... 26yo, so SHOULD be ready to go... legs might explode at any second.
Which way to go?
Does it even matter?
Sinclair.Sinclair or Houston? Massively conflicted and somewhat lured by the PODness of Houston. Similar price and average, both with huge ceilings and the occasional low score. Was planning to kick the can down the road a week but can DPP a maxxed out Van Rooyen and it probably swings a H2H at the top of the ladder for me and helps overall rank so am likely taking the plunge this round. 5 trades remaining. Grateful for any wisdom.
Option 2. In your position, with a relatively high number of trades it's all about points on field. As you said you can just use your trades as cover.In two (three?) minds as to what to do this week. Currently ranked just out of the top 250 and have 9 trades left, so can afford to be a bit bold. My team, like many, is pretty cookie cutter.
Option 1:
Out: Humphrey, Sturt
In: Walsh, Maric
Rationale: Cleanest option. Walsh clearly underpriced. Get a dead rookie off for one that should continue to get games. Coverage on each line is Cincotta/Melican, Johnson/Cincotta, Windhager/Maric.
Option 2:
Out: Humphrey, Cincotta
In: Libba/Jelly, Maric
Rationale: Get some more firepower into the team for the last upgrade. Bring in a potentially big scorer with sub 10% ownership. Leaves me with only Melican covering defence, but with 7 trades and no upgrades after these, I can afford a sideways if needs be.
Option 3:
Out: Oliver, Humphrey
In: Macrae/Serong, Walsh
Rationale: This is the best combo I can afford with the money I have (without downgrading anyone). Deal with Humphrey and Oliver in one swoop. Issue is that I'm replacing one of the best mids in the game (Oliver) with a sub-optimal option. If I could afford Trac/Libba/Kelly, it would be a different story.
I'm currently leaning option 2, but would love any thoughts?
Day is home against Carl, who are coming off the bye....Kept Ashcroft!
Also have Wilmot on the bench. Question will be who am I taking off. Sheezel or Day.
If Tyrell Dewar gets named, then I can only bench Day anyway. If he is in the WAFL then I have the choice. Would probably lean towards SheezDay is home against Carl, who are coming off the bye....
Sheezel is away at Adel with Nth coming off the bye....
If it was me, I'd bench Sheez, but I have Coleman in a keeper league, and I benched him, so what do I know...
Option 2.In two (three?) minds as to what to do this week. Currently ranked just out of the top 250 and have 9 trades left, so can afford to be a bit bold. My team, like many, is pretty cookie cutter.
Option 1:
Out: Humphrey, Sturt
In: Walsh, Maric
Rationale: Cleanest option. Walsh clearly underpriced. Get a dead rookie off for one that should continue to get games. Coverage on each line is Cincotta/Melican, Johnson/Cincotta, Windhager/Maric.
Option 2:
Out: Humphrey, Cincotta
In: Libba/Jelly, Maric
Rationale: Get some more firepower into the team for the last upgrade. Bring in a potentially big scorer with sub 10% ownership. Leaves me with only Melican covering defence, but with 7 trades and no upgrades after these, I can afford a sideways if needs be.
Option 3:
Out: Oliver, Humphrey
In: Macrae/Serong, Walsh
Rationale: This is the best combo I can afford with the money I have (without downgrading anyone). Deal with Humphrey and Oliver in one swoop. Issue is that I'm replacing one of the best mids in the game (Oliver) with a sub-optimal option. If I could afford Trac/Libba/Kelly, it would be a different story.
I'm currently leaning option 2, but would love any thoughts?
Option 2. In your position, with a relatively high number of trades it's all about points on field. As you said you can just use your trades as cover.
Great position to be in, you'll be praying to the SC Gods for some carnage to popular players.
Option 2 in your position
The people have spoken.Option 2.
I like the way your team looks there. Might as well go for it in your position.OK folks – looking for some guidance from the brains trust on this one. I’d planned to boost this week and go Ashcroft -> Walsh, Cincotta -> a non-playing rook and Ginbey -> Ryan. Unfortunately, I had to do the Ashcroft trade before last night, but I’d kept Wilmot as E Def in the unlikely event that he went big. Well, now that he has it puts me in a bit of a dilemma. Basically, I’ve got 2 options:
View attachment 1725384
- Forget the Ryan trade. Take Sheezel’s score at D6, take Johnson (loop) or Ginbey at M8 and go into the remainder of the season with 7 trades.
- Do the trades anyway. DPP magic gets me this team, with 5 trades left…
I lose my DM loop for future rounds, but it allows me to move Sheezel back to cover Wilmot if needed. Top 1k is a pipe dream, but I'm still looking at maximising my ranking. I guess my biggest fear now is if Dunkley has a LTI.
Thoughts???
Yeah - that's the way I was leaning, just with one slight amendment - moving Riccardi onto the field and Kentstable to the bench. Doesn't really achieve anything, just that certain sense of satisfaction in knowing that GC spud will actually serve no practical purpose in my team.I like the way your team looks there. Might as well go for it in your position.
Sorry for late response. I’d probably look at something like Yeo>HH @ Hump>Mills mate.Should I trade Humphrey > Himmelberg via Constable and keep Yeo for Def cover when he comes back or or trade Yeo for Sheezel?
View attachment 1723819