I know.Real big “I HAVE OPINIONS” energy from your comments in this thread over the past 24hrs
If you want to point out where I've got it wrong just tell me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know.Real big “I HAVE OPINIONS” energy from your comments in this thread over the past 24hrs
Your analysis and posting are 100% correct. Logic impeccable. Football knowledge, unimpeachable.I know.
If you want to point out where I've got it wrong just tell me.
Well I don't really agree 3KZ.Your analysis and posting are 100% correct. Logic impeccable. Football knowledge, unimpeachable.
You are too modest. Fans or acolytes?Well I don't really agree 3KZ.
But it's nice to have at least one fan.
Some people seem to have several.
Yet we have beaten the premiership favourites comfortably as well as the team ranked 4th, one spot behind us. I know both of those wins were when Gunston was in the team but our run has certainly looked better without him in the last few weeks. Our backline is probably functioning now better than it ever has and as long as we make correct calls at the selection table and don't drop players who are excellent runners for players who are liabilities when the ball isn't in hand, we are absolutely a great chance to win it this year. What seems to have stopped us previously is defensive run and our mids being outmuscled. This years we have been able to fix both issues.
I like, I think others aren't worried about Gunners being in against the Eagles, it won't be a factor in winning of losing this game. What worried me is that we give him an extended run while he isn't producing, specifically in his defensive run.The last game Gunners played, it was on Sicily. He had full license to roam and grab every intercept ball available and paid basically zero respect to Gunston.
Ended with 32 touches, 9 marks and a BOG performance. Gunston had 6 possesions and 0 goals.
It's not only the quick players that will play on him and 'run off' him its also the intercepters who are confident in breaking up other play.
I would give him a chance because as we said, if he is still cooked in 2-3 weeks then we write him off for the year. At least we know before round 21 if he is able to play and contribute. Otherwise Fages would have just picked him in R21 and Gunston plays a few games and then every final.
Other coaches would have just not selected him and been 100% ruthless but we just know that Fagan was always going to get him back in the side at some point. Better earlier than later.
It's wide open from 4-13 covered by 3 games.This year I don't think the quality of teams is quite the same as previous years. In previous years Port, Geelong, Richmond, Throwdogs and Melbourne have constantly been at the top with a chance to win, but when I watch the teams this year, I see only Port and Collingwood as the top teams.
We lost to Port in a stinker and we've beaten Collingwood at home.
Now Port could do what Port does and flop, which is entirely possible, but at the MCG I don't like our chances against Collywobble. For whatever reason, unlike other teams who don't play at the G very often, our gameplan has not worked well there.
Port also play the Magpies in 2 weeks so one will lose there, keep winning and we are still a big chance for top 2 and a home QF.It's wide open from 4-13 covered by 3 games.
I think it is wide open from 1-3 as well. Collingwood have only dropped 2 games but they have been run right down to the wire quite a few times and IMO haven't been as dominant as the media has made them out to be. We have dropped at least two games we shouldn't have as well (Hawthorn and Adelaide). I'm not sure that it is gameplan related, as has been discussed and dissected here, the dimensions of the gabba are quite similar to that of the MCG. But we have turned in some poor performances there recently.
Exactly. I've been giving it to Gunners since before he got here.I have never got the angst about posting styles/opinions, we are a forum for robust discussion, nothing I have ever read on here has got me riled up, even if an opinion is diametrically opposed to mine I don't see the point of getting offended or going after the poster.
Just have a laugh, use some facetiousness/sarcasm/humour and enjoy the banter.
I am with you on Gunston and I think the majority on here are as well... I would love to be proven wrong and for Gunston to hit near his peak career form but I just don't see it happening, particularly defensively.Exactly. I've been giving it to Gunners since before he got here.
I think maybe now it's time to give up.
We tried to bully the club into seeing reason , but he's bounced back like a toy balloon.
It would actually be awesome if he's had some injury issue and could get back near where he was .
I still think I'd prefer Ah Chee.
But I'd prefer Ah Chee to nearly all of them.
Port also play the Magpies in 2 weeks so one will lose there, keep winning and we are still a big chance for top 2 and a home QF.
Don’t worry about defensively. The number one aim is to kick a goal or 2. I thought if you couldn’t get a kick against Hawthorn you may as well give it away, well here we are, I reckon I could get a couple of cheapies this week, at least get a couple of Joe the Gooses, surely it can’t be that hard this week.I am with you on Gunston and I think the majority on here are as well... I would love to be proven wrong and for Gunston to hit near his peak career form but I just don't see it happening, particularly defensively.
So do you think that if maybe our mids had actually won the ball in that game, Gunston would have been free somewhere to take advantage.The last game Gunners played, it was on Sicily. He had full license to roam and grab every intercept ball available and paid basically zero respect to Gunston.
Ended with 32 touches, 9 marks and a BOG performance. Gunston had 6 possesions and 0 goals.
So do you think that if maybe our mids had actually won the ball in that game, Gunston would have been free somewhere to take advantage.
Exactly. I've been giving it to Gunners since before he got here.
I think maybe now it's time to give up.
We tried to bully the club into seeing reason , but he's bounced back like a toy balloon.
It would actually be awesome if he's had some injury issue and could get back near where he was .
I still think I'd prefer Ah Chee.
But I'd prefer Ah Chee to nearly all of them.
One of the biggest melt downs on the Lions page recently ☝this thread is peak bigfooty
Mods, I think we can delete basically every other post in this thread. We have our winner.yep few pages of good melts, someone threatened to push Nunez down the stairs for supporting Fagan's selection, Gunston got called a few names like not a third tall, not a goal kicker, can't mark over his head, Fagan's pet came straight back etc. Also we finally worked out Nunez is Chris Fagan.
The furore over the Jack Gunstonselection has taken a lot of spotlight away from the other ins for this game, I am particularly looking forward to see what role they give James Madden and how he goes... it will probably be Wilmot to the wing and Madden back but I wouldn't mind seeing Madden in the wing role, has had stints in that position in the reserves from my viewing of the reserves.PLAYERCARDSTART19Jack Gunston
- Age
- 33
- Ht
- 193cm
- Wt
- 86kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 15.5
- 4star
- K
- 10.5
- 4star
- HB
- 5.0
- 4star
- M
- 5.7
- 5star
- T
- 2.2
- 4star
- G
- 1.9
- 5star
- D
- 10.6
- 3star
- K
- 8.0
- 3star
- HB
- 2.6
- 2star
- M
- 4.3
- 4star
- T
- 1.7
- 3star
- G
- 1.6
- 5star
- D
- 11.2
- 3star
- K
- 7.0
- 3star
- HB
- 4.2
- 4star
- M
- 3.2
- 4star
- T
- 2.6
- 4star
- G
- 0.6
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
A fit and firing Dayne Zorkowould be a huge inclusion for us heading into finals as well.PLAYERCARDSTART15Dayne Zorko
- Age
- 35
- Ht
- 175cm
- Wt
- 77kg
- Pos.
- M/F
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 21.4
- 5star
- K
- 13.2
- 5star
- HB
- 8.2
- 5star
- M
- 3.6
- 4star
- T
- 6.0
- 5star
- CL
- 3.6
- 5star
- D
- 14.0
- 3star
- K
- 9.0
- 4star
- HB
- 5.0
- 3star
- M
- 2.0
- 2star
- T
- 5.0
- 5star
- CL
- 2.0
- 4star
- D
- 16.4
- 4star
- K
- 9.8
- 4star
- HB
- 6.6
- 4star
- M
- 5.2
- 5star
- T
- 6.6
- 5star
- CL
- 1.2
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
At the ground it was really noticeable there was no synergy or plan going forward. We dominated clearances (+20) but there spread from defence and outside run burnt us.So do you think that if maybe our mids had actually won the ball in that game, Gunston would have been free somewhere to take advantage.
The whole team should bear the brunt of that lossOur mids did a good job finding Sicily
That's what completely did my head in . Going to the guy who couldn't get warm.At the ground it was really noticeable there was no synergy or plan going forward. We dominated clearances (+20) but there spread from defence and outside run burnt us.
To be honest it was kind of weird because a lot of the time Gunston was the long down the line target at half forward, instead of Daniher or hipwood. The spacing was completely off and no synergy between leading patterns.
They had him leading on the wings, half forward line and also leading from the pocket.
There were a lot of passengers that day but Gunston couldn’t get close to even halting a contest.