PattyKwasagun
Norm Smith Medallist
News Corp may have just about the lowest ethical and moral bar of any organisation on the planet, but even that would be too low an act for them I think.Either that or intentional just to create clicks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
News Corp may have just about the lowest ethical and moral bar of any organisation on the planet, but even that would be too low an act for them I think.Either that or intentional just to create clicks.
The US Government, IOC and FIFA say hello!News Corp may have just about the lowest ethical and moral bar of any organisation on the planet, but even that would be too low an act for them I think.
Either that or intentional just to create clicks.
Giving them excuses.I get frustrated during the game with the umpires too . But the next day I'm always umpires have the worst job. It's hard, they make many more decisions than the players and players make mistakes.
Attracting new umpires is hard. By the time they have done a few years at local level they have already copped more abuse in their workplace than most of us will have in lifetime.
They know they are going to be abused st AFL level even if they get 99% of their decisions right. So the ones who make are mostly invulnerable to outside criticism. That's a small pool of available people.
Umpires are reviewed after games but not by emotional fans who hurl ugly abuse. They restrict the coaches taking about it because if they do it's ugly fan pile on and it will drive umpires out of the game. We need them.
Anyone want to defend tbe skill level this week?
BOTH teams were embarrassingly bad.
I get frustrated during the game with the umpires too . But the next day I'm always umpires have the worst job. It's hard, they make many more decisions than the players and players make mistakes.
Attracting new umpires is hard. By the time they have done a few years at local level they have already copped more abuse in their workplace than most of us will have in lifetime.
They know they are going to be abused st AFL level even if they get 99% of their decisions right. So the ones who make are mostly invulnerable to outside criticism. That's a small pool of available people.
Umpires are reviewed after games but not by emotional fans who hurl ugly abuse. They restrict the coaches taking about it because if they do it's ugly fan pile on and it will drive umpires out of the game. We need them
This is inexcusable from the umpires. Disgusting.
Typical gutter press . Joe is this week’s target again .
Giving them excuses.
They are completely bias against Joe and Charlie and some of their decisions and own confirmation biases are appalling. Yet on the other hand, the Daicos brothers, Pendlebury apparently do no wrong.
And no doubt your attitude towards the umps is the same as the AFL, no repercussions, no learnings, just allow it to keep happening.
Giving them excuses.
They are completely bias against Joe and Charlie and some of their decisions and own confirmation biases are appalling. Yet on the other hand, the Daicos brothers, Pendlebury apparently do no wrong.
And no doubt your attitude towards the umps is the same as the AFL, no repercussions, no learnings, just allow it to keep happening.
Umpire rage in action. This is totally unacceptable. Vitriolic outbursts and umpire blaming can contribute to a culture that results in injuries to umpires. Without them, we do not have a game.
Thanks for doing my thinking for me
Like I said there are reviews and the umpires are shown their errors so yes plenty of learning.
What's your solution to get umpires into the league? Obviously going after then with a big stick is part of your approach. Do you think there are loads of umpires waiting in line and you just sack every umpire who makes mistakes?
You seem anti learning so without reviews how do you improve umpire performance? Yell at them and wave the big stick?
I'm going to go against the grain here I think a few 50/50s went against Joe but hardly as bad as some of the comments here are suggesting.
This it textbook gaslighting…the idea that you you can’t criticise umpiring in what amount to highly subjective judgement calls is absurd
There's a world of difference been incompetence to bias and on to corruption which is what you're implying.Pay them more so that the temptation of taking money for point-shaving is less tempting
There's a world of difference been incompetence to bias and on to corruption which is what you're implying.
Thanks for doing my thinking for me
Like I said there are reviews and the umpires are shown their errors so yes plenty of learning.
What's your solution to get umpires into the league? Obviously going after then with a big stick is part of your approach. Do you think there are loads of umpires waiting in line and you just sack every umpire who makes mistakes?
You seem anti learning so without reviews how do you improve umpire performance? Yell at them and wave the big stick?