Preview Round 4, 2024: Richmond v St.Kilda - Norwood Oval, Sunday 7th April, 3:20PM AEST *GATHER ROUND*

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
So when was he concussed? If by Windhager where is the sanction of Essendon playing a concussed player. Surely clearedby the club doctor to continue

If not concussed by Windhager why is it classed as medium contact?

As you say guessing.

On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app

Grading:

Careless
1711949860864.png
Medium
1711949901852.png
High

No dispute on high since arse to face, no point disputing careless as we'll run into same thing with Ming as player says 'I did this and thought these things" and AFL rep will be "you're wrong, I know what you thought and you intended to hurt them" so medium impact is the go, point 3 or 5.

So it's termed as "reasonable", what's reasonable in that situation, which is why I intimated that we ask the question of if concussed or if potential was so much for medium we cite Essendons incompetence and dereliction to put a potentially concussed bloke back on the field and the AFL's own statement of "no charge for Ross" on that very same player and listen as the AFL rep tries to worm their way to justify it.

Further drive home how corrupt, inept, ridiculous it all is, as if they're not a legal court, not beholden to things and all that good stuff to explain their nonsense, then just treat it with abject disdain, what's the worst that could happen? We lose $10k for the attempt? We prove them right in pissing them off and then screwing us on prime time television?

Lessgo to that party and make demands.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So that is three huge outs for the Tigers. Lynch, Bolta and Baker. Grimes no certainty to trurn either.

Probably levels up the missing for both teams.
Dusty no certainty either according to their board.

Honestly both teams will be playing whoever they have left that's actually available

On Pixel 7 using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
From that footage, will definitely go. Is airborne, turned for contact (which seems to be nail in coffin for any player so far this year), just charged in at the opponent with no eyes at all for the ball, only for the player he was charging and head involved. So as he was not looking at the ball, cannot claim at all he was contesting the ball.

If I had to guess it will be more than a week too.

Looking at the Tigers Board they all seem to agree he is gone as well.
I agree
Has the twit MRO even cited him for it?
If he doesn’t go …and we don’t make noise bout that then this is a joke
Must go
 
Shame Windhager misses as he would of been good cover for Shai Bolton
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

No Lynch, Balta, or Baker. A sore Dusty. Underdone or no Grimes.

If we can’t win next week, with King back, we’re going nowhere this year.
 
No Lynch, Balta, or Baker. A sore Dusty. Underdone or no Grimes.

If we can’t win next week, with King back, we’re going nowhere this year.
Also no Gibcus, Prestia, Hopper and Graham.

9 of our best 23 are out. You’ll be boosting that percentage this week.
 
Also no Gibcus, Prestia, Hopper and Graham.

9 of our best 23 are out. You’ll be boosting that percentage this week.
We are still St Kilda, nothing is a percentage booster for us. We make everything difficult.

Also aren't flush for choices in selection either. We are down to debutants to replace Windhager this week.
 
We are still St Kilda, nothing is a percentage booster for us. We make everything difficult.

Also aren't flush for choices in selection either. We are down to debutants to replace Windhager this week.
I count 7 best 23 out for you guys too. I would say you have much better depth than us. Neutral ground and a nice day predicted who knows!

We don’t have much at all to cover the outgoings. Might be very small up forward.
 
We are still St Kilda, nothing is a percentage booster for us. We make everything difficult.

Also aren't flush for choices in selection either. We are down to debutants to replace Windhager this week.
B: Webster* - Van Es - Paton
HB: xxxxx - Howard - xxxxx
C: Wood - Dow - Clark
HF: Henry - Allison - xxxxx
F: xxxxx - Hayes - xxxxx
Foll: xxxxx - Windhager* - Crouch
With Hill - according to scuttlebutt - under a cloud…

10 injured (7 genuine Best 22), 2 suspended, 1 questionable, and a couple underdone…

But if we fancy ourselves any sort of team, we still need to win this one.

B: Stocker - Wilkie - Cordy
HB: Wang.-Mil. - Battle - Sinclair
C: Hill - Phillipou - Byrnes
HF: Owens - Membrey - Butler
F: Higgins - King - Caminiti
Foll: Marshall - Steele - Ross

Int (from): Jones Sharman Wilson Bonner Hastie Garcia Collard
Is still good enough to win games.
 
Last edited:
I count 7 best 23 out for you guys too. I would say you have much better depth than us. Neutral ground and a nice day predicted who knows!

We don’t have much at all to cover the outgoings. Might be very small up forward.
Small might be better for you. Sinclair still looks underdone and Bonner isn't strong defensively.

I rate your chances exploit that.
 
B: Webster* - Van Es - Paton
HB: xxxxx - Howard - xxxxx
C: Wood - Crouch - Clark
HF: Henry - Allison - xxxxx
F: xxxxx - Hayes - xxxxx
Foll: xxxxx - Windhager* - Crouch
With Hill - according to scuttlebutt - under a cloud…

10 injured (7 genuine Best 22), 2 suspended, 1 questionable, and a couple underdone…

But if we fancy ourselves any sort of team, we still need to win this one.
That really highlights out weak our already weak midfield is right now.

Good thing Steele is fit again.Going to be carrying that area more than he ever has.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top