SALADA/VladFL: Slap on the wrist. - STRICTLY ESSENDON SUPPORTERS ONLY

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, in short, the AFL has submitted a list of charges to the EFC that we'd supposedly sign off on? Then, after the AFL's nose has been 'bloodied' so to speak, they retaliate by releasing the original charge sheet, including things which are supposed to be confidential, to the media in an attempt to humiliate and discredit the club?

How does ANYONE come back from that?

In an effort to pressure certain figures to stand down, it seems the AFL have just shot itself in the foot?

But surely there own legal advice would be all over this and they couldn't be that dumb? Could they?
 
Yoda_ said:
The core issues with in each story is different (EFC - drugs, Cronnulla - mismanagement) hence the "stories are parallels apart" comment earlier there fodzilla.

We believe we have done nothing wrong on that part, so we won't take a backward step. Cronulla have acknowledged they did something wrong and are now trying to make them right.
Click to expand...
Disagree, we have only been charged with BTGID (bad management) and not drugs, yet the AFL's charge sheet is full of references to drugs. Exactly what are we being charged with?
 
kelvin_sheedy said:
Looks like the AFL pooped their pants after the report last night and have gone full throttle trying to protect their own backyard all the while dragging the game into the mud and where no one wants to be.
Click to expand...

after today. there simply is no turning back for either party involved


guess this means James is off Andy D's christmas card list then? :D
 

Log in to remove this ad.

MVT0y1T.gif


Get Em Little
 
Yoda_ said:
I thought it was about Salary Cap breaches?
Click to expand...
It started with ASADA and has consequently blown up as all matter of shady stuff has been revealed. Essendon's situation is nowhere near that, but my point is that the club clearly is already accepting responsibility. The question is what exactly it should be taking responsibility for.

Yoda_ said:
carry on
Click to expand...
:confused:
 
fodzilla said:
It started with ASADA and has consequently blown up as all matter of shady stuff has been revealed. Essendon's situation is nowhere near that, but my point is that the club clearly is already accepting responsibility. The question is what exactly it should be taking responsibility for.

Grow up. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


Just out of curiousity. Are you the anti Essendon? been a few little pot shots and snide remarks coming my way from you lately
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

fodzilla said:
Perhaps Little should put out a statement that says something like:

"As I have said before, the Club recognises that it had shortcomings in governance and management practices in late 2011 and 2012. Already we have changed many things within the Club to avoid a repeat of this, and we understand that we will have to accept a penalty from the AFL for these shortcomings."

How would you feel about that Yoda_?
Click to expand...

We have already said this multiple times. Everyone just ignores that part because the media and the simpletons focus only on TEH DRUGZZZ
 
Vajayjay said:
THis doesn't seem to be suing? Isn't it just asking for the case to be heard in a different medium?

James Hird is suing the AFL, lodging a claim with the Victorian Supreme Court that he has been denied natural justice in a season-long doping probe, and demanding that the case be heard by an independent tribunal instead of the league’s ‘‘conflicted’’ commission.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/james-hird-to-sue-over-afl-ambush-20130821-2sbrw.html#ixzz2cbFncnLv
Click to expand...

I wouldn't expect Sam Lane to understand the difference. She's not very bright.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

eth-dog
Retired #45: Anthony Munkara - Leaving the club, returning to Tiwi - 7/9
13 14 15 16 17
Replies
414
Views
44K
FlyingV
FlyingV

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top