Thats Power said:Post it on port board. :Rolleyes:
Is that the PAFC or PAMFC board?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Thats Power said:Post it on port board. :Rolleyes:
PAMFC has no boards.. PAFC board.Port Adelaide Football club changed their name to Power to avoid the clash with the magpies.If theres no collingwood then we should have joined the AFL as port adelaide magpiesroyaldave said:Is that the PAFC or PAMFC board?
I have read all the PAMFC related threads on the main board..your power buddies agree with you but i am far from convinced.Thats Power said:Post it on port board. :Rolleyes:
Classic cow comment. Read it here, most of the port fans dont care about pamfccrowsfan2004 said:I have read all the PAMFC related threads on the main board..your power buddies agree with you but i am far from convinced.
In 1997 the Port Adelaide Football Club joined the Australian Football League, in many ways the crowning achievement of more than 100 years of unrivalled success. It maintained its presence in the SANFL through the formation of the Port Adelaide Magpies Football Club, who share the records and history from 1870 to 1996.
yob said:You know what? If people want to discuss this topic which has already been done to death, they can do it in the million other threads on it. Don't hijack an SANFL history thread for this crap.
Does Port adelaide football club and Port adelaide magpies football club sounds the same to you? the name engraved in the SANFL club is not PAFC its PAMFC.PAFC is now playing the AFLroyaldave said:This is from http://www.portmagpies.com.au
This quote is interestingly conflicting in that
a) it recognises that TWO clubs now exist.
b) BUT it says "IT maintained its presence in the SANFL" - hence it implies that through the PAMFC it ('it' being PAFC) is still in the SANFL.
Tell that to jimmy.. he started his ******** . I told him to search bigfooty for his topic ..cause this was done to death.. but some people love ******** stirring.yob said:You know what? If people want to discuss this topic which has already been done to death, they can do it in the million other threads on it. Don't hijack an SANFL history thread for this crap.
Thats Power said:Tell that to jimmy.. he started his ******** . I told him to search bigfooty for his topic ..cause this was done to death.. but some people love ******** stirring.
Thats Power said:, i'm insulted that the SANFL would think that what they have done in this instance is acceptable. if, instead, the PAMFC was created with a clean slate (ie: no pre 97 history) i would have been happy to participate in SA football still, but alas, the PAMFC are just imposters for the stupid IMHO & the SANFL have just turned this into a farce.
. Port's submission did not include club representation in the SANFL however as has been stated before a number of times, the SANFL (directors of the other SANFL clubs) who still wanted to feel important, did not want an SANFL without a "Port Adelaide" so the Port Adelaide Magpies Football Club was formed to continue with the SANFL history of the PAFC.
?
Good for ya that your over it ya tossaJimmy said:im far from convinced, but alas i am over it. I apologise for hijacking this thread, but it was just too tempting. Thank you 'Thats Power' for being a willing player ya tossa
royaldave said:This is from http://www.portmagpies.com.au
This quote is interestingly conflicting in that
a) it recognises that TWO clubs now exist.
b) BUT it says "IT maintained its presence in the SANFL" - hence it implies that through the PAMFC it ('it' being PAFC) is still in the SANFL.
Hollypig said:Sorry I'm a tad confused, were'nt you rabbiting on about ''a proud heratige'' in a previous post ?, & now the PAMFC are ''imposters for the stupid'' ?
& going by your little history lesson your giving us, the PAMFC were FORCED to form a club by the directors of the other eight clubs to ''feel important''.
Is this correct ? are you serious ?
Port Adelaide 1870 said:"IT" being a club from the Port Adelaide district.....
The history also tells you "That a new club was formed to replace Port Adelaide Football Club and maintain "Its " presence in the SANFL"....a continuous Presence by a Club from the Port Adelaide area...Not the Continuance of the PAFC, but an unbroken presence by a Port Adelaide based representative in the SANFL..Whether that be the PAMFC or the Port Districts Football Club or Alberton United or Ethelton FC or Portland FC,
The PAMFC was chosen as a name and colours to try and maintain a perceived continuance and rivalry, In essence to retain the income stream that a club with a Magpies moniker would give the SANFL and those that wished to still be part of a SANFL, Port Adelaide district based football club at local level.
regards
PA1870
royaldave said:Do opposition fans of PAMFC and PAFC feel the SANFL's credibility is lessened by having this fraud club as part of the league?
Goat said:Not stirring, but PA1870, are you saying that:
- PAFC formed 1870 won 34 premierships then entered the AFL
- PAMFC formed 1996/7 to represent Port region but no links to PAFC and so had 0 premierships, but have since won 2
- most old Port supporters don't recognise the PAMFC as old Port, and only the last 2 flags count for them, and their website is misleading because the SANFL forced this strange situation upon them?
LBJ23 said:I don't have a problem with it.
Pt Adel Magpies formed in 1870 have 36 SANFL flags.
Pt Adel Power (formerly Magpies) also formed in 1870 have 34 SANFL flags (because they have the same history as the Magpies until the end of 1996, & then formed a new team to be known as the Power when they joined the AFL in 1997) and 1 AFL flag.
Easy as that.