I'm am extraordinary critic of Nic Nat. Doesn't he cost his club like 200k a game?
Like if you add up every players salary and divide it by the number of games they've played he cost the most
& is worth every cent plus more ....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm am extraordinary critic of Nic Nat. Doesn't he cost his club like 200k a game?
Like if you add up every players salary and divide it by the number of games they've played he cost the most
I blame the vicco media bias.
Garry Lyon + Jason Dunstall were heavy critics of his. You must have had your head inside your ass if you can't remember the years of critisicm he got
Yep, Gary Lyon said he'd take Zac Clarke (Freo/Ess) over Naitanui.
What in the actual **** are you talking about. They regularly smashed him for his poor marking ability and for yearsThey're hardly criticising his ability, if anything they're criticising his lack of game time more than anything or even his "low" disposal numbers.
Did anyone take Cyril over the coals for his low disposal numbers? mmmnup nor is or has anyone for Nic Nat.
Matthews says he's going to struggle around the ground, well duh - he's been out of the top level for how long now? If that's a criticism then sneezing at the wrong time is a criticism.
What in the actual **** are you talking about. They regularly smashed him for his poor marking ability and for years
Players start hearing big heavy dreadlocked footsteps when hes aroundUse the search function, there's threads on here that are highly critical of him.
Not me though, I think when he's playing he's the best tap ruckman in the league. He doesn't get the ball around the ground like the others, but he affects the play in other ways with his bulk and bullocking work.
It’s the vicco bias mate, everything is that vicco bias.Bias hardly, just group think, very local group think serving a narrowly focussed market.
It’s the vicco bias mate, everything is that vicco bias.
I remember seeing a stat once that of all the WC players to play 100+ games he had the lowest average marks. Below midfielders and small pocket players.NicNat has been criticised for having a marks per game average of less than 2, given his size and mobility.
everyone in wa thinks all their players are underrated.I'll quote from these two clowns from footy WA
Scott Watters:
"Luke Schuey has been under rated"
Pffft really? Anyone who under rates that bloke is a fool, there is no one that disputes Luke's ability. Not disputable.
Scott Cummings:
"Nic Nat has had his critics"
Show me one critic of Nic Nat Scott.
This is not up for debate Scott's, you're both wrong and those players should rightly be pi55ed at you two w******.
Seriously poor form and not helping the west teams.
everyone in wa thinks all their players are underrated.
It's an outrage all right, you should write to the WA government.
Game winning after-the-siren kick in a final. Exactly!
And then the most clutch player in the league nailed the game winner after the siren. Imagine if Smith had his composure.
If I may rephrase, is their any grounds for criticism of Nic Nats game? There's a strong argument for "no".
In any case apart from Matthews observation which is really all it is, any criticism of NN is past.