Funny you should say that, the kids are in a plane making phase.Making planes?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Funny you should say that, the kids are in a plane making phase.Making planes?
but a common sense approach wouldn’t be good for ratings.Appealing a tribunal decision is allowed, why on earth are they questioning a club using every lever they have possible to plead their case? Have Robbo or Gerard actually read feedback on their social media channels and realised that no one agrees with them? Surely their producers are telling them this
Why have they not been whining and complaining about the leniency of the pickett decision..if they want controversy they can go after pickett and put the Melbourne market offside..leave us bloodywell alone for oncebut a common sense approach wouldn’t be good for ratings.
These parasites feed off trolling to get ratings
Fixed it for you.Journos on the whole are garbage.
The guy from sanfl prelim 2018 comes with a high recommendationFixed it for you.
Are we getting a good KC for the appeal?
The 360 idiots said the opposite last year that whether a player is injured or not doesn't matter. Surely you penalise for the action and the injury is incidental. Whether a player is injured or not has many variables outside of the control of the player laying the bump. The woke Whateley flip flops like a politician. He's a crow hater.The morons on 360 are arguing that because Pickett didn’t injure the bloke he only got 2 games.
It’s like they’ve just landed from mars.
I think you are being stalkedFunny you should say that, the kids are in a plane making phase.
AFL probably should've come out immediately and spoke up against Pickett's ruling, but not long after he quickly accepted it before it could be made worse. If Pickett got at least 3, I wouldn't be so annoyed with McAdams' ruling. Without Pickett's bump, I would normally say McAdams should get anywhere from 0-2 weeks (2 being the worst case scenario because he plays for Adelaide). Pickett should've gotten 3-4 for that launch. MRO just makes no sense.Why have they not been whining and complaining about the leniency of the pickett decision..if they want controversy they can go after pickett and put the Melbourne market offside..leave us bloodywell alone for once
So you’re All_out ?Can someone start a super league already! If a Vic club wants to join it's a $20m licence fee.
Sick of the VFL. Sick of the bias coverage, commentary, decisions.
They even bang on about average AFLW players compared to the legends over here.
It's R1 and I'm over this poo already.
(These DHs can't even get a CEO)
I can’t comprehend how Pickett can only get 2 weeks and McAdam 3. Is it because Wehr went off for a concussion test and Smith didn’t?
I can’t understand watching that show, I’ve seen a little bit of it over the years and it’s a load of wank. Two tossers with crap opinions.How ironic that last year Cripps smashed Ah Chee into tomorrow; gets off on a technicality ; then wins the Brownlow and Slobbo and Whateley cream themselves over ‘what a magnificent player he is’
All was forgotten and forgiven.
Buddy has been sniping and doing that s**t he did last week for years….but he’s a magnificent player so nothing to see here…
Hodge and Mitchell….what great leaders they were despite being snipers…..
The VFL media are the epitome of hypocrisy.
Used to watch AFL360/FC etc religiously.
Not anymore.
People enjoy controversyI can’t understand watching that show, I’ve seen a little bit of it over the years and it’s a load of wank. Two tossers with crap opinions.
But to watch or listen to Wheatley on SEN and then to whinge about what is said, just seems weird to me. I don’t get why people do it. Just don’t give them your time.
I’m not sure it’s that, I think it’s more people are footy tragics and want to get their fill of footy, that’s why I’ve tried it over the years but then can’t get through an episode, besides their shitty opinions I can’t stand Wheatleys voice and Robbos stupid demonstrative way he talks. I also have no interest in listening to other teams players or coaches wank on.People enjoy controversy
This was my observation too when watching the game. I thought it looked bad because Wehr was basically winded, rather than a head knock causing a concussion. The fact that Wehr passed the concussion test and able to play out the match pretty much tells you there wasn’t any significant head trauma in this case.I think a couple of things contributed to McAdam’s hit being sent to the tribunal and him gaining a more severe penalty. Firstly he hit him low in the chest and severely winded him - this caused a lot more impact noise and took Wehr a few minutes to recover from. Secondly it was so hot/humid the whiplash like movement of Wehr’s head sent a spray of perspiration everywhere, this made things look so much worse in slo-mo.
I thought it was unduly rough play (an old fashioned shirt-front to the body) and was worth a couple of weeks. It was a tough but dumb thing to do.
Whichever way they compared the incident to other cases or “standards”, it still reeks of bias or some kind of agenda. We’ve been dealt shit penalties on so many occasions in the recent years to Tex and DMac just on a quick brainstorm.In theory, that shouldn't be necessary, because incidents are not compared with each other, they are measured against what is supposed to be an objective standard. The issue here is not that e.g. McAdam wasn't compared with Pickett, it's that both of them were compared to the "standard" and this was done in an inconsistent manner.
So you’re All_out
In the past:Saw McAdam’s bump on the weekend - very lucky Wehr was ok. 2-3 weeks suspension fair enough.
Just watched Franklin’s bump. Not as bad as McAdam, but still braced and contact high. Very lucky only 1 week.
Just watched Pickett’s bump - worse than McAdam due to feet off the ground! Again, lucky the Bulldogs player was ok. Should be a minimum 3, maybe 4 weeks.
I can’t comprehend how Pickett can only get 2 weeks and McAdam 3. Is it because Wehr went off for a concussion test and Smith didn’t?
Im still not sure if the shirtfront is legal, but if it still is, which I assume to be the case, it wasn't head high (proven), so I agree there shouldn't even be any charge. It was forceful no doubt, but if it's a legal bump, which it appears to be, will they change the rules to say "you can bump, but you have to bump softly" ?All these posts about being ok with McAdam getting 1 or 2 weeks confuse me.
He is being charged with being rough in the top level of AFL for legally bumping the guy with the ball - causing no injury, no secondary concussion, nothing.
Not off the ball.
Not blind sided.
No swinging arm.
The player didn’t have their head down and he came flying in hitting him high.
No one was hit in the head.
It’s completely ridiculous that he should even be charged, let alone sent straight to the tribunal.
About the only AFL media people who'll get my attention are Jonathon Brown and Nathan Buckley at this point. Because they're both secure enough in themselves and their opinions (and have yet to become complete caricatures of themselves like some others) that they don't need to make stupid and ludicrous claims for attention.I can’t understand watching that show, I’ve seen a little bit of it over the years and it’s a load of wank. Two tossers with crap opinions.
But to watch or listen to Wheatley on SEN and then to whinge about what is said, just seems weird to me. I don’t get why people do it. Just don’t give them your time.
I don’t mind HealyAbout the only AFL media people who'll get my attention are Jonathon Brown and Nathan Buckley at this point. Because they're both secure enough in themselves and their opinions (and have yet to become complete caricatures of themselves like some others) that they don't need to make stupid and ludicrous claims for attention.
I don't mind Tredders either, though he's a Port guy, so can never be near the top of my list.
I get what your saying..All these posts about being ok with McAdam getting 1 or 2 weeks confuse me.
He is being charged with being rough in the top level of AFL for legally bumping the guy with the ball - causing no injury, no secondary concussion, nothing.
Not off the ball.
Not blind sided.
No swinging arm.
The player didn’t have their head down and he came flying in hitting him high.
No one was hit in the head.
It’s completely ridiculous that he should even be charged, let alone sent straight to the tribunal.