Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Im happy to stand by my opinion on Goldy. We need to be aggressive to get the number 1 pick, if it means offloading goldstein then do it. If we keep goldstein then Drewy time on the park has to be reduced. Bring him in for big games against the more fancied teams of next year. Whatever the way it turns out its my opinion and whatever you or others say wont shift me of my thoughts on Goldstein.That is a baffling perspective.
Yep ......keep on sniping. Read the thread again................there in black and white rated top 2, I said.Don't rate Goldy but he is worth the No 1 pick. ******* ridiculous.
Curran is coming through? He's the only guy I know who has spent more time in a moon-boot than out of one. Maybe we could trade him with NASA for a rookie astronaut?
Daw is thereabouts? Where exactly that is, I'm not sure. When asked on Friday night when he will play senior footy next, his response was, "As long as the team keeps playing well & keeps winning, I'm happy to play in the VFL." What a bizarre response on so many levels. But now that we have re-signed Daw for 2 years, he needs to play the rest of this season - no excuses. The season is cooked & he needs game time.
Here's the deal, another team will not generously offer you a good player/good draft pick for garbage and as the Grant Schwass trade proved, it is possible to have a win/win trade. This board went ballastic when we traded McIntosh for a later pick and who is the winner at this point in time.I understand this is a touchy subject because we get attached to players but the simple fact is, if you want to trade quality in you are going to lose quality the other way, and unless its a draft pick it will hurt.
Here's the deal, another team will not generously offer you a good player/good draft pick for garbage and as the Grant Schwass trade proved, it is possible to have a win/win trade. This board went ballastic when we traded McIntosh for a later pick and who is the winner at this point in time.
Here's the deal, another team will not generously offer you a good player/good draft pick for garbage and as the Grant Schwass trade proved, it is possible to have a win/win trade. This board went ballastic when we traded McIntosh for a later pick and who is the winner at this point in time.
Trading is far more complex than most of the discussion that postulate x player for x player and a bag of chips.
Good thing I'm not in charge down at the club ey?
Yeah I did, I said make Daw and Currie our main rucksYou realise of course that you have traded a scenario where we have 1 ruckman to another scenario where we have one ruckman.
You mentioned Daw but he wasn't in your structure.
Y
Yeah I did, I said make Daw and Currie our main rucks
Exactly.So we trade out Goldy, for an unproven ruckman and a guy who's future is in the forward line and maybe 20% time in the ruck who currently cannot run out a game at AFL level, but that doesn't matted as hes not listed in your structure anyway.
We get a kid who's never played at AFL against men.
You've also retired our 1 genuine game breaker.
Traded out another senior leader.
and the expectation you have is that we would get better?
I wonder how far backwards we would fall.
its only round 18 when does trade month end? what October?
Threads full of speculation about trading players are the worst threads. People forming positions and then arguments to justify those positions on things we have absolutely zero control over and even less influence on. They are worse than the changes threads. Trading is far more complex than most of the discussion that postulate x player for x player and a bag of chips.