Medicine and vaccines use emissions to manufacture them.don't take medicine or vaccines.
That would be illegal.and please don't vote.
So AP can you please tell us how the AFL can do more to prevent climate change.
We're all waiting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Medicine and vaccines use emissions to manufacture them.don't take medicine or vaccines.
That would be illegal.and please don't vote.
You are quite the smarty pants. Coal and gas make more emmissions than vaccines you clown.Medicine and vaccines use emissions to manufacture them.
That would be illegal.
So AP can you please tell us how the AFL can do more to prevent climate change.
We're all waiting.
Sometimes I think I'm batshyte crazy, then I read the SRP and I feel good about myself.
Umm AP you do realize that it takes emissions to make those vaccines and medicines right? Coal and gas to make them, fact.You are quite the smarty pants. Coal and gas make more emmissions than vaccines you clown.
Don't be a clown that talks trumpy/malcom roberts turd talk .
Your arguments are juvenile rubbish.Umm AP you do realize that it takes emissions to make those vaccines and medicines right? Coal and gas to make them, fact.
And could you please answer the question? How would the AFL prevent climate change?
I don't have an argument, just pointing out that your vaccines and medicines require emissions to make them.Your arguments are juvenile rubbish.
No they can't.The AFL could ban sponsorship from the big polluters such as Woodside and mandate renewable energy sources where possible at clubs.
You point out vaccines use emmissions? So what?I don't have an argument, just pointing out that your vaccines and medicines require emissions to make them.
No they can't.
No they don't 'lead' on those issues, they advocate, even though as a sporting organization they have little or zero stake on those issues.You point out vaccines use emmissions? So what?
The AFL can lead on climate, they do on racism, women, homophobia and a lot of other things.
Is it utopian to lead on climate? Gmab mate.No they don't 'lead' on those issues, they advocate, even though as a sporting organization they have little or zero stake on those issues.
They haven't achieved anything on those issues (apart from inclusion of women through the AFLW, but that's from a $ and sporting perspective, not a progressive one). Why? Because they're a sporting organization, not a govt. body with the power to make actual change.
So please tell us how the AFL can do more to prevent climate change? Advocacy? That'll do sweet FA.
Once again, your irrational progressive utopian views are shining through.
Semantics, climate change needs real action from govt. bodies, sporting bodies advocating will do literally zero.Is it utopian toleadadvocate on climate? Gmab mate.
Agreed, it is up to governments but governmenrs need pressure to act.Semantics, climate change needs real action from govt. bodies, sporting bodies advocating will do literally zero.
And what is Gmab?
Gmab!Agreed, it is up to governments but governmenrs need pressure to act.
Gmab means give me a break.
Wtf is a cooker.You're a cooker
It's basically a term for a crazy person.Wtf is a cooker.
Some of you guys throw the term around without any understanding of whom you're conversing with or what their positions are.
I'm not a climate denialist and was among the first to take the COVID vaccine when they became available to me, yet some still call me a cooker. It's an overused term.It's basically a term for a crazy person.
So anti Vaccer, climate change denialist, etc.
Its a great term.
it wasn't limited to those two things.I'm not a climate denialist and was among the first to take the COVID vaccine when they became available to me, yet some still call me a cooker. It's an overused term.
Don’t stress it’s only the opinion of far left loonies.I'm not a climate denialist and was among the first to take the COVID vaccine when they became available to me, yet some still call me a cooker. It's an overused term.
Completely agree. I don't hear the term used in my usual circles at all, and I work with educated people - some with science doctorates.
I'm agreeing with Demons09 that the term 'cooker' seems to come ONLY from those of the far left, whether they be educated or uneducated. The educated people I know - who are moderate, right leaning or politically apathetic - don't use the term at all.You live and work in a highly educated field and hear uneducated garbage from easily manipulated people...
And your take-away is that the educated people are the problem?
Exactly...I'm agreeing with Demons09 that the term 'cooker' seems to come ONLY from those of the far left, whether they be educated or uneducated. The educated people I know - who are moderate, right leaning or politically apathetic - don't use the term at all.