- Jan 13, 2013
- 23,986
- 48,400
- AFL Club
- West Coast
...You realise KERRPOW isn't Simmo right?I could show you to quality peer reviewed medical papers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...You realise KERRPOW isn't Simmo right?I could show you to quality peer reviewed medical papers
Maybe i am...You realise KERRPOW isn't Simmo right?
pretty irrelevant to my comment...You realise KERRPOW isn't Simmo right?
Well you offered to show Kerrpow peer reviewed medical papers on hamstring/back injuries. He already agrees with you so what purpose would that servepretty irrelevant to my comment
sharing is caring - I support him.Well you offered to show Kerrpow peer reviewed medical papers on hamstring/back injuries. He already agrees with you so what purpose would that serve
I think they made their decisions on moving players to the 'inactive' list based solely on alphabetical order.View attachment 1408018
Kennedy a test so back to play Bulldogs
Shuey and Foley potentially available
No Yeo listed, so should be in WAFL with Sheed
It's almost an embarrassment of riches
At a guess it was a ankle syndesmosis surgery consult because they tried to handle it conservatively and it's gone to shit again.Why are our players listed as TBC for so long after initially getting injured?
Unless an injury is unknown to medical science, or a player gets injured that week and they’re still waiting for scans and specialist advice, there should be some type of timeline.
Only one TBC, that has to be a record.
That should read: "So far, until later in the week"
There is a very simple answer to this... Because our medicos have no ****ing idea. Maybe a week, maybe a year let's just make it TBC and once he runs without needing a stretcher we'll call it a test. Or list them as 3-4 weeks in perpetuity...then onto the LTI list.Why are our players listed as TBC for so long after initially getting injured?
Unless an injury is unknown to medical science, or a player gets injured that week and they’re still waiting for scans and specialist advice, there should be some type of timeline.
There's no way they can police it and it's their own stupid fault for bringing in a dumb rule like that so quickly.Will the AFL look into the Shuey sub? There's been a lot of talk about players getting subbed out and then playing the next week.
Confirmed dead.The TBCs only look better because two of them went to “inactive”.