Headcases version to get off a striking charge
Yeah some real credibility there...Yet Im the deluded one....sheesh
Read this article then get back to me =)
http://www.afl.com.au/Season2007/News/NewsArticle/tabid/208/Default.aspx?newsId=41502
NOONE that was on the field gave evidence/was a witness for selwood
Just the chairman as a PR stunt
Whereas Bell presented evidence as a Lawyer
Credibility count?
Headland 1, Selwood 0
Still will probably never know what was said until Selwood grows some and spills the beans[/QUOTE]"
Wow a Lawyer a profession that makes it's money from twisting the truth, akin to a car salesman or call centre operator.
Probably gave evidence as "a bloke trying to support his team mates bullshit" Bell seemed like a clubman, so he would be aware that the club has paid a fortune to get the underperforming Headcase and probably also realised that the value being returned would be even less with the bloke suspended.
Obviously if Headlands version is to be believed Selwood must already "have some" or how did he do that thing.