Houston is going for the ball... As we can already see him turning his shoulder before Rankine has even taken possession of it. He decided to flatten Rankine regardless of if he took possession of the ball by that point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Houston is going for the ball... As we can already see him turning his shoulder before Rankine has even taken possession of it. He decided to flatten Rankine regardless of if he took possession of the ball by that point.
Can he end up with more games?Hopefully it gets upgraded to 6 weeks.
Didnt someone post on here that said Kenny would accept whatever decision come down?Port showing their usual contrition levels once again.
Is it any wonder?Reading the Port board is unbelievable. The level of delusion is astonishing.
Apparently Houston is an angel who has never done any wrong and world is picking on Port Power again. Oh and it's because the AFL is woke. That was a favourite.
Port supporters are actually the worst. Complete morons incapable of logical thought.
There was no where near as much force with the rankine bump.Still got your Crows glasses on I see as that's a pathetic argument when you concuss a player who's just jogging along. Getting tagged gives you no right to injure someone. I didn't like what Rankine or Houston did regardless of their colours.
The best players in the game are constantly tagged, get used to it, another decade of that for Rankine.
"we'll accept any decision that the AFL hand down .. as long it's the 3 weeks we recommended"Didnt someone post on here that said Kenny would accept whatever decision come down?
Get ****ed Koch you stupid campaigner.Is it any wonder?
Koch said both clubs had to be considered with what they said leading up to Showdowns.
“Good old-fashioned banter is one thing … but when you look back at that (Rachele) discussion, could it be seen as really elitist crap, denigrating, almost poor-shaming...?
“There is the lighthearted Crows fans are the chardonnay set and that sort of thing, but where do you draw the line?
“I know this is not right, but I’m just using it as an example of lighthearted banter towards a supporter group and then it becoming personal, you don’t say, the Crows are a wealthy supporter group because they’re white-collar criminals and rip off the workers.
So according to Koch:
- Port calling Crows chardonnay sippers = light hearted banter
- Crows saying Port have no teeth = elitist crap, denigrating, poor shaming ...
They have that option.Can he end up with more games?
Maybe he should question why one of his players changed his name to a guy that got jailed for constantly bashing his wife. You are the company you keep.Is it any wonder?
Koch said both clubs had to be considered with what they said leading up to Showdowns.
“Good old-fashioned banter is one thing … but when you look back at that (Rachele) discussion, could it be seen as really elitist crap, denigrating, almost poor-shaming...?
“There is the lighthearted Crows fans are the chardonnay set and that sort of thing, but where do you draw the line?
“I know this is not right, but I’m just using it as an example of lighthearted banter towards a supporter group and then it becoming personal, you don’t say, the Crows are a wealthy supporter group because they’re white-collar criminals and rip off the workers.
So according to Koch:
- Port calling Crows chardonnay sippers = light hearted banter
- Crows saying Port have no teeth = elitist crap, denigrating, poor shaming ...
Port officials and players have been throwing barbs and making antagonistic comments about Adelaide and it's supporters for years. There have even been large ads in the Advertiser with them. But the second it goes the other way, they whinge like a fat-arse half-wit who just had his hat flicked off
So Port spend years slagging off, then when it is done back they have a cry?Is it any wonder?
Koch said both clubs had to be considered with what they said leading up to Showdowns.
“Good old-fashioned banter is one thing … but when you look back at that (Rachele) discussion, could it be seen as really elitist crap, denigrating, almost poor-shaming...?
“There is the lighthearted Crows fans are the chardonnay set and that sort of thing, but where do you draw the line?
“I know this is not right, but I’m just using it as an example of lighthearted banter towards a supporter group and then it becoming personal, you don’t say, the Crows are a wealthy supporter group because they’re white-collar criminals and rip off the workers.
So according to Koch:
- Port calling Crows chardonnay sippers = light hearted banter
- Crows saying Port have no teeth = elitist crap, denigrating, poor shaming ...
2017Port officials and players have been throwing barbs and making antagonistic comments about Adelaide and it's supporters for years. There have even been large ads in the Advertiser with them. But the second it goes the other way, they whinge like a fat-arse half-wit who just had his hat flicked off
Maybe you should have hip and shouldered the judgeIt didn’t help in my divorce settlement
"Good old-fashioned banter is one thing" says Koch, but apparently saying some fans have no teeth is taking things too far?
Okay, so what is the acceptable old-fashioned banter, Kochy? Should Rachele have called them a bunch of meanies? Dunderheads maybe?
No teeth, capless dibber dobbers.Koch urged to apologise for shock Mick accusation
Port president's 'White Australia' barbwww.nine.com.au
I expect calling an older coach a "dinosaur" and inferring he's a racist is just banter and jokes.
Probably the shirt front didn’t helpMaybe you should have hip and shouldered the judge
Kochhead is the biggest hypocrite of them all.No teeth, capless dibber dobbers.
Unlimited ammunition for us crows fans for the next 100 years.
Thank you Port Adelaide. Idiots.
I'd like to see that but AFL asked for 5 weeks.Hopefully it gets upgraded to 6 weeks.
Rankine got four weeks for very similar just two months ago. I don't get it how Houston is a dog act but Rankine's wasn't, in fact Rankine had more time to think about what he was doing.
Please take off your Crows coloured glasses before commenting. Houston and Rankine were both out of order, no place in the game for this any more.