So who was overlooked in the National Draft?

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

A ruckman is what Adelaide will target IMO. What chance of Baulderstone to Adelaide?

IMO Baulderstone is not AFL quality. He does not jump nor is he exceptionally tall, wont make it against the better AFL rucks
 
Minson, Jamar and Mumford all fit that description and are easily AFL quality

Minson is 30 soon, Jamar is 31, Mumford is 28.

Notice a trend?

That style of ruckman who was successful, is now becoming an elder statesman of the game. The new talent is better, more athletic.
 
Minson is 30 soon, Jamar is 31, Mumford is 28.

Notice a trend?

That style of ruckman who was successful, is now becoming an elder statesman of the game. The new talent is better, more athletic.

Except Mins on was AA in 2013 and Mumford at stages this year was the most dominant ruck in the game imo
 
Except Mins on was AA in 2013 and Mumford at stages this year was the most dominant ruck in the game imo

I still reckon the newer more athletic types will be progressing
 
Someone should give Shane Nelson a crack.

Absolute ball magnet in the WAFL and a lousy 52 possessions in the last game

Every year we hear Nelson, and every year we have the same result. Maybe he is just a good solid VFL or WAFL player.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Cal Twomey has put up a short list of who he thinks would be a sneaky chance i nthe Pre - Season/Rookie drafts

link here

CLUBS are already thinking about next week's NAB AFL Pre-Season and Rookie drafts, assessing the talent that wasn't selected at Thursday night's national intake. Here are 10 names who might be considered.

Peter Bampton (182cm, 83kg, midfielder): A ball-winner who has really solid frame, which means he could step into a club and play a role. Bampton averaged 19 touches in seven senior SANFL games for Norwood this year, having missed the under-18 championships with an ankle injury.

Daniel Capiron (189cm, 81kg, defender): Was overlooked after an inconsistent season where he struggled to find any continuity. But he has shown signs across two seasons of his ability to read the ball in the air, be a good intercept marker across half-back and offer rebound.

Matt Hammelmann (197cm, 88kg, forward): He can join the Brisbane Lions under the pre-selection rookie rule as a member of their academy. Other clubs might take a look if they don't, as Hammelmann has shown signs he can be used at either end of the ground with success. Mainly it's as a forward, though, where he presents on the lead and kicks well.

Tyler Keitel (194cm, 86kg, forward/defender): Spent the season pushing back and forward, and showing he could play a role at either end. His athleticism is what might hold him back, but given his versatility a club might see something to work with.

Oleg Markov (186cm, 69kg, forward): Having broken his collarbone twice this year, Markov's limited exposure would have contributed to him not being drafted. A club might be better placed to take him on as a rookie, given his speed and athletic ability in the forward line and midfield.
 
What's the put off with Shane ?

He is ready made
Not sure... posted his stats for 2014 on our board.
2014 stats:

20 games622 disposals (31.1 av) [Highs of 52, 44, & 38. 13 times with 30+]
78 marks (3.9 av)
6 goals 11 behinds
66 tackles (3.3 av)
41 frees for, 12 against
 
Minson is 30 soon, Jamar is 31, Mumford is 28.

Notice a trend?

That style of ruckman who was successful, is now becoming an elder statesman of the game. The new talent is better, more athletic.

As much as I agree, "that style of ruck men" will slowly come back into the game with that dumb '1m rule' in place for around the ground stoppages. Rucks essentially stop and tap rather than run and jump like they have for the last 4 or so years.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top