Play Nice Society, Religion & Politics Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

I won't quote you, Daymee because you've messed up the quoting etc but, to put it bluntly, you have projected onto me a bunch of motivations that simply don't exist.

The Mardi Gras. I personally don't like it. I understood its purpose back in the day as a kind "**** you, this is who we are and we're proud of it" political statement. Great. But in an environment where grid girls are being sacked, I find the message regarding objectification and self objectification confusing to say the least. That said, I didn't say I was against the float. I said it makes me cringe. It's a personal thing. I'm a great admirer, as an old, white, hetero, male, of the female form yet dancing girls at sporting events make me cringe as well. So do ground announcers and confected atmosphere creators. And vegans who seem determined to let everyone know they're vegans.

I was at the 2014 Grand Final. I heard a lot of awful things from drunk Hawthorn supporters. I didn't hear anything about homosexuality. I doesn't surprise me one bit if there were some remarks like that in a crowd of 100k. My first comment on the subject acknowledged that the bigots were still there but said that they are not going to have their views changed by any clubs' participation in certain initiatives, however well meaning. I stand by that. There has been an even bigger push over decades to stamp out racism in football and yet I continue to hear, and certainly did that day, plenty of racist remarks, even leaving aside the booing. It leaves me wondering whether perhaps some of these initiatives, again, however well meaning, end up having the effect of being counter productive.

You want to celebrate all of these initiatives at the footy? Great. Fantastic! More power to you! I think it's a little rich, though, for you to project on to me an absence of compassion and some sort of a poor upbringing if I hold a slightly different view. For many people, footy is supposed to be an escape from the drudgery of everyday life in Winter. They pay big money for the privilege of living in an irrational fantasy for a couple of hours a week. I happen to be of the view that a mandatory social justice sermon shouldn't necessarily be thrown into the mix of that, especially when those sermons are beginning to show signs of counter productivity.
 
Again, in the last few months there was a game our own club was involved in where people with more insight than as to what it's like being homosexual in a footballing environment quite clearly outlined that homophobia in football isn't some relic that doesn't really show up any more. If you want to claim it as a fact, you'll need to do better than offering your observations as someone who would never have experienced it.


It's a pretty poor (and telling) way of phrasing it.

It's impossible to tell from what you have posted about your friends whether they were victims of objective bigotry or whether they were being oversensitive snowflakes or whether it was something in between. From the perspective of an "old, white, heterosexual" administrator at a local level I have had to deal with difficult situations right along the spectrum for over 20 years. Not just related to homosexuality, but racism (or at times perceived racism), sexism, or any manner of other issues. I learned long ago not to make presumptions about individual incidents.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

It is the perception of many football supporters who just want to watch a game of footy without "this week's social justice issue".
When is there a social justice sermon during football games or even in the mix of a football game?
It's impossible to tell from what you have posted about your friends whether they were victims of objective bigotry or whether they were being oversensitive snowflakes
In what scenario would you consider targeted bullying towards an individual from a group a case of the individual being an oversensitive snowflake?
 
When is there a social justice sermon during football games or even in the mix of a football game?

In what scenario would you consider targeted bullying towards an individual from a group a case of the individual being an oversensitive snowflake?

1. I said it was a perception.

2. No. No you don't. No way. You describe the circumstances and I'll decide my opinion on it. You're asking me to comment on something about which I have no idea as to the circumstances, in the context of you having already applied meanings to my previous comments that simply don't apply. I don't intend to play that game.
 
1. I said it was a perception.
Thats nice, but when you said "I happen to be of the view that a mandatory social justice sermon shouldn't necessarily be thrown into the mix", I asked when it actually happened. When does it actually happen that there is a mandatory social justice ceremony mixed in with a football game?

2. No. No you don't. No way. You describe the circumstances and I'll decide my opinion on it. You're asking me to comment on something about which I have no idea as to the circumstances, in the context of you having already applied meanings to my previous comments that simply don't apply. I don't intend to play that game.
Its not playing any game. When would you consider homophobic abuse target at an individual as the target being an oversensitive snowflake. This was a distinction you brought up.

I have to be honest, the fact that you didn't immediately say "I would consider any situation where an individual was the subject of taunting from a group based on his sexuality unacceptable" is, again, pretty telling.
 
Last edited:
Thats nice, but when you said "I happen to be of the view that a mandatory social justice sermon shouldn't necessarily be thrown into the mix", I asked when it actually happened. When does it actually happen that there is a mandatory social justice ceremony mixed in with a football game?


Its not playing any game. When would you consider homophobic abuse target at an individual as the target being an oversensitive snowflake. This was a distinction you brought up.

I have to be honest, the fact that you didn't immediately say "I would consider any situation where an individual was the subject of taunting from a group based on his sexuality unacceptable" is, again, pretty telling.

What's telling is your persistent refusal to detail the precise circumstances of the event. You have so far only described a perception. And an applied definition from the "victim".

I don't know what words were used. I don't know the context. I don't know the relationships between the various parties.

In short, I don't judge on vague hypotheticals.

What is also "telling" is your expectation that I should so judge based only on the words (and only just now used) "taunting based on sexuality".

Is any sort of taunting allowed? Redheads? Dress sense? Kicking ability? Fitness? Appearance?

I played alongside a bloke for 10 years. He called me "big nose". I called him "fat campaigner". We remain the best of mates?
 
I like these threads. The usual suspects all reveal themselves and demonstrate why this is a necessary positive step by the club. I'm proud that I am a member of a club that takes issues like racism and homophobia within the sport seriously.

Does this refer to me and, if so, what specifically makes me a "usual suspect" and what have I revealed about myself?
 
Is any sort of taunting allowed? Redheads? Dress sense? Kicking ability? Fitness? Appearance?

I played alongside a bloke for 10 years. He called me "big nose". I called him "fat campaigner". We remain the best of mates?

You think that homophobic abuse is the same as someone getting shit about being fat or having poor fitness?
 
You think that homophobic abuse is the same as someone getting shit about being fat or having poor fitness?

All other things being equal, yes I do. Jokes in fun between mates are a matter of mutual respect. A group of bullies hurling abuse at someone's weight or appearance (or race as we witnessed with Goodes) is just as cruel as hurling abuse about sexuality.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I agree that politicizing sport isn’t ideal, and that Mardi Gras has become a parody in and of itself and it’s original importance. But I’m not sure a football club showing support to the LGBT community is being political. I think it’s just being decent. The AFL has shown it’s willingness to embrace multiculturalism and gender equality because everyone should feel welcomed and comfortable in the sport they love. Why should the gay community be any different?

It’s easy for us to sit behind our keyboards and say LGBT people are doing just fine and this is unnecessary, but it’s probably very different for a lot of gay people out there. I once played footy with a kid in juniors who I always suspected was gay, because he never seemed to fit in with the alpha male environment. I found out about eighteen months ago that he took his own life after years of struggling with his sexuality. I kept thinking geez I wish I did more when I knew him, to let him know it was OK to be himself and his team-mates (as far as I knew) wouldn’t judge him if he came out. But then I remembered it wasn’t my place to try and force that out of him, he had to feel comfortable doing it himself.

I think that’s what the club’s involvement with the LGBT thing is all about. It’s not about making a statement about the left or right or any kind of agenda we’re pushing. It’s just about reaching out to a sub-culture that’s rife with mental health issues and saying it’s OK to be yourselves. We may never understand why that’s important, but for a lot of young gay people out there to see these alpha sporting heroes spreading that message it could literally be life-saving.

That’s just my thoughts on the matter anyway.
 
simply put Bruce, you're speaking like the world revolves around you and what you've seen,

throw in a dash of normalising abuse you've received yourself and we're here

Sorry? What does that mean? I expressed an opinion. I have been challenged on that opinion. Repeatedly. I have responded to those challenges.

Now, it seems, I'm some sort of narcissist for holding and defending an opinion. Is that right?
 
All other things being equal, yes I do.
How often were people murdered, thrown in jail or denied equal rights for having a big nose? Did we have a vote recently where everyone got to decide if fat people were given equal rights to others?
 
Last edited:
Sorry? What does that mean? I expressed an opinion. I have been challenged on that opinion. Repeatedly. I have responded to those challenges.

Now, it seems, I'm some sort of narcissist for holding and defending an opinion. Is that right?

that sounds like you're putting words in my mouth. You may be a narcissist but I'll leave that up to you

The matter is about empathy,building a more inclusive community and acknowledging that marginalisation exists.

Hope things are well Bruce
 
How often were people murdered, then in jail or denied equal rights for having a big nose?

Ah.....we've switched from body shaming to something more mild. If I wanted to be extreme, I guess I could talk about all the Jewish type abuse I got for my more prominent facial feature then talk about the 6 million odd Jews that were murdered and the ongoing anti-Semitism that exists to this day but I'm not Jewish, despite that being used towards me as some sort of weird insult.

We've also switched from current bigotry to historic bigotry. And there also seems to be this presumption that I approve, or even did approve of such bigotry.

It's almost like that Jordan Peterson interview on Channel 4 (you should Youtube it, it's very good) where the interviewer keeps trying to shift the ground of the debate.

Tell me something, when I'm having a cold beer with my gay mate who I played water polo with and he accuses me of drinking like his mates at his favourite nightclub, should I laugh or call out his bigotry in disgust?
 
that sounds like you're putting words in my mouth. You may be a narcissist but I'll leave that up to you

The matter is about empathy,building a more inclusive community and acknowledging that marginalisation exists.

Hope things are well Bruce

Things are well thanks, Dan. If you go back to my original post which was repeatedly misquoted, my view is that participation in the Mardi Gras makes me cringe, is probably good PR for the club, but is unlikely to assist in stamping out the dregs of bigotry towards homosexuals.

I don't think anyone, for any reason, should be the subject of abuse. Hopefully, my record of objecting to some of the more nasty comments made about various players on this forum is testament to that.

But I also object to being told that I'm too old, white, and heterosexual for my opinion on a matter to mean anything and I object to that opinion being represented as other than what it is.
 
Tell me something, when I'm having a cold beer with my gay mate who I played water polo with and he accuses me of drinking like his mates at his favourite nightclub, should I laugh or call out his bigotry in disgust?

You're allowed to be spoken to in a way that makes you feel comfortable. And this situation comes down to you and your friend, and what makes you feel comfortable. It is important to note our verbal communication is limited, so humor may be your friends way of sharing certain parts of his life.

I'd probably laugh and move on because he's probably not intending to be a bigot. And wonder why I thought I should be disgusted.
 
Things are well thanks, Dan. If you go back to my original post which was repeatedly misquoted, my view is that participation in the Mardi Gras makes me cringe, is probably good PR for the club, but is unlikely to assist in stamping out the dregs of bigotry towards homosexuals.

This is a terrific step forward IMO

My very casual football watching partner who doesn't follow the pre season (besides my regular updates) had wind of this news, her friends were talking about it and she was so glad to see Swans leading the way with diversity and outreach.

She later reminded me how proud I should be to be associated with the Swans and their colours.

true story.

But just PR I guess
 
3. People, by and large, would like to be able to just get on with their lives irrespective of their skin colour, gender, sexuality or the rest without being constantly badgered at by a small group of others who seem dedicated to perpetuating a sense of victimhood in society.
Can't say the Mardi Gras is my cup of tea, but I think it's a big stretch to interpret the Swans - who are based in the heart of the gay community - entering a float in that exuberant, colourful, celebratory event as "badgering" or "perpetuating victimhood". I think you're reading way too much into this action.
 
We've also switched from current bigotry to historic bigotry. And there also seems to be this presumption that I approve, or even did approve of such bigotry.
No we haven't. It's recognising that groups of people have been marginalised, abused, and legally discriminated against. Overweight people and people with large noses haven't experienced that.


Tell me something, when I'm having a cold beer with my gay mate who I played water polo with and he accuses me of drinking like his mates at his favourite nightclub, should I laugh or call out his bigotry in disgust?
I need more details about the situation before I can answer.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Society, Religion & Politics Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top