Stephen Dank takes it to another level

[Doss]

Not sure what Dank is playing at. He won't to ASADA though. This will be a stumbling block for any further investigation. Barrett claims to have seen documents relating to this so who knows what's going on.

Barrett claims a lot of things.

 

[VL3OJ]

Barrett claims a lot of things.

Barrett tends to need to watch the 7:30 report to get his "inside" information.

 

[Adelaide Hawk]

Barrett claims a lot of things.

Yes, it would be easier to apportion credibility to Barrett if he wasn't such a headline seeking flog.

 

[LeverPuller]

Bit of an all-of-a-sudden claim, especially when testosterone use is certainly tested for...you'd think players would have failed a drug test in that case.

Also, for the record, only 16 players from 2013 remain on the list in 2016, and that's including Hogan and Viney who were only added in the 2012 draft. So if he can name 17 players he's certainly including guys who are no longer at the MFC.

 

[Strapping Young Lad]

Purple saying Dank is now throwing Melbourne under the bus for suggesting testosterone use. Think he said he could name 17 players.

He's going nuclear.

 

[Percel]

I think it was WAY earlier than DJ. (Think 2013).

This one?

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/mini-series.1024001/page-2

 

[RegHickeyStand]

Dank was at Essendon, wasn't he?

 

[compact72]

I know purple can be a fair flog, but his normally pretty good with his mail. Won't run with it unless his 110%

 

[Tulip]

Dank has been out the news for a while, better sell Nathan Bock into shit and make vague threats about documented use of long-banned drugs.

Vicious media circle, fuelling this loon.

 

[Satan]

This one?

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/mini-series.1024001/page-2

2 more pages of htb brilliance

 

[Adelaide Hawk]

Purple saying Dank is now throwing Melbourne under the bus for suggesting testosterone use. Think he said he could name 17 players.

Well then, he should name them, otherwise he should STFU.

 

[compact72]

Thank **** the bulldogs never hired Danks for anything

 

[Crankyhawk]

Not a shred of evidence exists to support this theory.

The ACC report? Where it stated (incorrectly) that AOD was permitted in sport.

 

[Falcon27]

I know purple can be a fair flog, but his normally pretty good with his mail. Won't run with it unless his 110%

Well he did run with the Hurley looking to leave EFC, only to back track afterwards. Would not say that is 110%.

And yes he is a flog.

 

[matthew_s]

Interesting he has records (and Barrett mentioned seeing them) but the Essendon records don't exist.

 

[Randomizor]

Well he did run with the Hurley looking to leave EFC, only to back track afterwards. Would not say that is 110%.

And yes he is a flog.

True. Suing your club really says "I'm definitely going nowhere else".

 

[Muggs]

On this point you are mistaken. ADADA said they were not prosecuted because pursuing athletes for their possible use of AOD-9604 prior to WADA’s statement would be unsuccessful and unfair because athletes and support personnel could not have known it was a prohibited substance. WADA specifically said it was banned only in April 2013 (under section S0 of the code).

Whether this is a sufficient reason and what the full story is, is another matter entirely.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...table-disappoints-players-20140618-zsdqk.html

Not quite. April 2013 was when WADA clarified the status following media reports, not actually banned it. The recent WADA comments on AOD9064 and questioning why it was not pursed supports this.

This could be what you meant but not how I read that last sentence first paragraph.

Otherwise totally agree!

 

[jenny61_99]

This one?

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/mini-series.1024001/page-2

Oh I love you!

 

[less than zero]

Dank was at Essendon, wasn't he?

Yes, and consulting Robinson at Geelong during their premiership years.

 

[the_interloper]

Yes, and consulting Robinson at Geelong during their premiership years.

No one at Geelong has been proven to cheat so far though.

 

[Spongebob]

No one at Geelong has been proven to cheat so far though.

Yep, no positive tests

 

[the_interloper]

Yep, no positive tests

Same as West Coast in the 90s I guess.

 

[Spongebob]

Same as West Coast in the 90s I guess.

With such an imputation, I'm shocked to be sitting here.

 

[the_interloper]

With such an imputation, I'm shocked to be sitting here.

Who cares, you got away with it and won flags, well played.

 

[RegHickeyStand]

Yes, and consulting Robinson at Geelong during their premiership years.

So you reckon Robinson was using peds back then?