- Mar 4, 2007
- 2,072
- 16
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
That is unbelievable. The match review panel is completely out of control.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Well thats Bakers fault.If he broke his jaw though he wouldn't of been on the field....to continue to niggle.
On the Website it says - 14, if enter early plea he can get 9.
SJ elbow to face and he gets 2.
hm - is this described as anti football?
AFL are desperate to stop the Saints from winning a premiership.
Ling, C Jones, A Selwood, Baker, Cornes and all the other taggers your about to become obselete. Taggers are just as good for footy as any other position, they are needed.
THE chances of West Coast's Brent Staker playing in the AFL this weekend are improving by the day, as the defender has been cleared of a broken jaw and is recovering from concussion.
When players throw a punch or two, yep sure, a few weeks, when they bump high or clothesline someone, yep another couple....but if a dog comes along and tries to deliberately target an injured area than he deserves to get all the games thrown at him.
And please, this was exactly the same situation that happened when Riewoldt injured his shoulder in 2004 - when the lions deliberately targeted his shoulder.
The lucky one out of all this is the dog who tried to knock Jimmy Bartels arm after he hyper-extended his elbow and was coming off clearly in a lot of pain. NOt sure if it was Hayes or Dal Santo or whoever....but they should count there lucky stars that they aren't slapped with a massive suspension.
Mooney and Johnson got what they desereved, Baker deserves more in my opinion.
On the Website it says - 14, if enter early plea he can get 9.
SJ elbow to face and he gets 2.
hm - is this described as anti football?
AFL are desperate to stop the Saints from winning a premiership.
Exactly. If you are going off the field for an injury, different story.To the people saying "he targetted an injury" harden up. Once you cross the line you are fair game injury or not.
To the people saying "he targetted an injury" harden up. Once you cross the line you are fair game injury or not.
Spot on.Well thats Bakers fault.
He has 50% loading on each report because of prior, also weighting of each report
He will fight each one and they will probably drop the impact of the charges, etc and he will only end up with 5-7 weeks.
Currently as it stands with each report and the player in question, the 12/9 is fine. No need to panic, it just seems absurd at the moment, by tomorrow evening everyone will accept the weeks.
We didn't see the 12 weeks coming because we didn't know how many reports he would have.
Must be correct because his calculator says so. Who cares if the suspension is completely ridiculous and completely out of whack with all other suspensions?
Well theres your predecent
Mal Michael - 0 Weeks
Brad Scott - 0 weeks
To the people saying "he targetted an injury" harden up. Once you cross the line you are fair game injury or not.
I seriously question the umpires on the night, they could have poured water on this farce between these two by paying a couple of free's, the whole thing just snowballed, just ridiculous.
this mess is on the umpires head IMO
If he wasn't Stevie 'dog' Baker he would have got 9 weeks (225,225,225,125) and 6 weeks early plea (168.75,168.75,168.75,93.75)This is what you get when you put dweeby little accountants like Adrian Anderson in charge of the MRP.
I can just see the little dweeb sitting there with his calculator adding up all the charges and multiplying by x amount for a bad record then pressing equals and 14 weeks getting spat out.
Must be correct because his calculator says so. Who cares if the suspension is completely ridiculous and completely out of whack with all other suspensions?
I hope St Kilda appeals against this shit every way possible. Absolute joke.