Swans Board Official Trade Ideas Thread Part II

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

Oh.

Meh okay
 
Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

This is gonna be a lonnnng week
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

No source yet other than what was on Sunrise. Someone on the Brisbane board said SEN were running with it as well.

Edit: Apparently we lost Pick 22 and gained Pick 28 in the deal.
 
Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

If they can push through a "reasonable" early deal to secure Seaby...then Swans are in a good position to negotiate hard ball for Jolly!:thumbsu:
 
With Hawks Campbell retiring...means they have to get a decent ruckman if they are going to be any chance! Forget Burgoyne

There have been too many "decent" posters with foreknowledge...for Hawks not to be in this ...Jolly move ... up to their eye balls!
 
With Hawks Campbell retiring...means they have to get a decent ruckman if they are going to be any chance! Forget Burgoyne

There have been too many "decent" posters with foreknowledge...for Hawks not to be in this ...Jolly move ... up to their eye balls!
What do you reckon you could get from them?

Pick 9?
 
Dude... why? it seems like that is an auto response from you? Plz essplain?

I don't know.

Me...OK.If I were Hawks seeing how valuable Jolly was this year... he is an excellent ~50m shot at goal!

9+Kennedy!:eek:
Huh?

Seems like the obvious question.

If you're keen for Hawks to get involved in a Jolly trade, surely you have an idea of what you'd like in return.
 
Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

West Coast did very well to extract our 2nd rounder. Sure we got a good deal for Bucky but i would of just ontraded 28 for Seaby. I guess with the Jolly development, it sort of forced our hand.
 
Huh?

Seems like the obvious question.

If you're keen for Hawks to get involved in a Jolly trade, surely you have an idea of what you'd like in return.

Nah contrary to popular belief:D... I don't entirely run SSFC!

I trust Roos ,Stewie & team...they have proven time and time again they are really good at trading and drafting!

But Collingwood need something in ruck division too!:)
 
Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

That's what I thort Jeffers but then I realized we will be compensated for with jolly, and hopefully the kid the pies give us is worth a second rounder.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

It's not like losing 6 places at that stage of the draft is a big deal.
 
Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

It's not like losing 6 places at that stage of the draft is a big deal.


I have a theory....

Minor placings mean little... Swans tend to find/target someone prepared to move outside a "footy" state!

Woo them!!!!.... like only the great "Malfunction" can:D

They (paleyer) show less interest (they don't batt eyelids) at others in return for "we will definitely pick you!"

Crazy I know:eek:
 
Jolly = 1st round pick + quality young player

Hawks Pick 9 + Kennedy
Pies Pick 14 + Dawes/Brown/Anthony/Dick etc.
 
Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

If they can push through a "reasonable" early deal to secure Seaby...then Swans are in a good position to negotiate hard ball for Jolly!:thumbsu:

I actually think a bit differently re the timing.

As soon as we've signed off on a deal for Seaby, we're signalling that we're resigned to trading Jolly. Our strongest card with Jolly is that we don't need to trade him. Unless the Hawks enter the fray for Jolly, it will essentially be a choice of trading him to Collingwood or keeping him. If they know that keeping him is really on the cards, they might actually cough up a semi-decent player - ie not Ryan Cook!
 
I would think the club would be far more open to a second round downgrade (28 - 22) if we believe we will get value out of Jolly.

Trade week looking pretty good for us thus far.
Paul Roos was just on SEN, saying the Swans will try to trade Jolly back to Melbourne, but Jolly understands that he's contracted for two years, and that the Swans would need a significant improvement on pick 15, which is what they gave up to get him. Roos was adamant pick 14 would not get it done.
 
Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

I actually think a bit differently re the timing.

As soon as we've signed off on a deal for Seaby, we're signalling that we're resigned to trading Jolly. Our strongest card with Jolly is that we don't need to trade him. Unless the Hawks enter the fray for Jolly, it will essentially be a choice of trading him to Collingwood or keeping him. If they know that keeping him is really on the cards, they might actually cough up a semi-decent player - ie not Ryan Cook!

We don't need to trade him. He still has 2 years of his contract left.

From what I understand Paul Roos said that he will try and get a deal through, but like O'Keefe if no on eis willing to pay the price he wont be traded.

We are already resigned to loosing Jolly, IF THE DEAL I RIGHT
 
Paul Roos was just on SEN, saying the Swans will try to trade Jolly back to Melbourne, but Jolly understands that he's contracted for two years, and that the Swans would need a significant improvement on pick 15, which is what they gave up to get him. Roos was adamant pick 14 would not get it done.

I seem to think that Hawthorn are in prime position to nab Jolly at this stage.
 
Re: Bucannon traded to brisbane

I actually think a bit differently re the timing.

As soon as we've signed off on a deal for Seaby, we're signalling that we're resigned to trading Jolly. Our strongest card with Jolly is that we don't need to trade him. Unless the Hawks enter the fray for Jolly, it will essentially be a choice of trading him to Collingwood or keeping him. If they know that keeping him is really on the cards, they might actually cough up a semi-decent player - ie not Ryan Cook!

Disagree:)

I see Seaby as merely adding height to a smallish squad and potential bit forward backup!

Also, potentially super Ruck duo.

(OP ....sorry to derail Buchy thread but he has his own already anyway)
 
That is fair. We got him when he was a no name for pick 15 and turned him into one of hte best ruckmen in the league, we should be well compensated for him, better than what we gave awy to get him anyway.

As has been said, either:

Pick 9 plus Kennedy from the Hawks (if they start up negotiations with us, unlikely considering the Pies have apparently been talking with Jols for a few weeks and they are wanting Burgoyne)

or

Pick 14 plus Dawes or Nathan Brown (Brown sounds very unlikely)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top