Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What do you reckon you could get from them?With Hawks Campbell retiring...means they have to get a decent ruckman if they are going to be any chance! Forget Burgoyne
There have been too many "decent" posters with foreknowledge...for Hawks not to be in this ...Jolly move ... up to their eye balls!
What do you reckon you could get from them?
Pick 9?
Huh?Dude... why? it seems like that is an auto response from you? Plz essplain?
I don't know.
Me...OK.If I were Hawks seeing how valuable Jolly was this year... he is an excellent ~50m shot at goal!
9+Kennedy!
Huh?
Seems like the obvious question.
If you're keen for Hawks to get involved in a Jolly trade, surely you have an idea of what you'd like in return.
Presumably this doesn't stop you having a view on possible trades.Nah contrary to popular belief... I don't entirely run SSFC!
I trust Roos ,Stewie & team...they have proven time and time again they are really good at trading and drafting!
Presumably this doesn't stop you having a view on possible trades.
It's not like losing 6 places at that stage of the draft is a big deal.
If they can push through a "reasonable" early deal to secure Seaby...then Swans are in a good position to negotiate hard ball for Jolly!
Paul Roos was just on SEN, saying the Swans will try to trade Jolly back to Melbourne, but Jolly understands that he's contracted for two years, and that the Swans would need a significant improvement on pick 15, which is what they gave up to get him. Roos was adamant pick 14 would not get it done.I would think the club would be far more open to a second round downgrade (28 - 22) if we believe we will get value out of Jolly.
Trade week looking pretty good for us thus far.
I actually think a bit differently re the timing.
As soon as we've signed off on a deal for Seaby, we're signalling that we're resigned to trading Jolly. Our strongest card with Jolly is that we don't need to trade him. Unless the Hawks enter the fray for Jolly, it will essentially be a choice of trading him to Collingwood or keeping him. If they know that keeping him is really on the cards, they might actually cough up a semi-decent player - ie not Ryan Cook!
Paul Roos was just on SEN, saying the Swans will try to trade Jolly back to Melbourne, but Jolly understands that he's contracted for two years, and that the Swans would need a significant improvement on pick 15, which is what they gave up to get him. Roos was adamant pick 14 would not get it done.
I actually think a bit differently re the timing.
As soon as we've signed off on a deal for Seaby, we're signalling that we're resigned to trading Jolly. Our strongest card with Jolly is that we don't need to trade him. Unless the Hawks enter the fray for Jolly, it will essentially be a choice of trading him to Collingwood or keeping him. If they know that keeping him is really on the cards, they might actually cough up a semi-decent player - ie not Ryan Cook!