Swans, Crows not top two: Malthouse

Remove this Banner Ad

Or how we have had to play Geelong, Collingwood, West Coast & Sydney twice. He shouldn't drink and post.

If you read what i wrote.. I said to "DATE" you haven't played syd or wce TWICE YET....Hawks are a good team no doubt and should be there in september but to say the crows draw has helped them to be in 2nd spot TO DATE is wrong as hawks have had a similar draw to round 20
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Adelaide have been gifted a friendly draw, but they have been good enough to take advantage of it. IMHO they would be top 4 or very close to it even without the draw tilting their way, but probably not top 2. Most Crows fans I know accept that.

Sydney - not sure why people still don't rate a team which has had a very average draw and is top of the ladder with a huge percentage after this many rounds of footy.
 
They're both top 4 sides, or close enough to it. Good enough for me.

September sorts out the pretenders from the contenders. So we'll find out soon enough if they are top 2 / GF material.

I'm a little surprised that people still doubt the Swans though. Maybe they have issues in the depth department, but they haven't been given an easier draw like Adelaide has.
 
Swans are definitely top 4 quality (though their forward line is a shambles without Reid there) but I'm not sold on the Crows. I don't think they'll beat Collingwood or Hawthorn in a final, even at AAMI. I'd be confident about Geelong having to potentially play them in a semi final. Crows also seem to be winding down - they were comfortably beaten by a Geelong team a few players short of its best, pushed to the wire by an undermanned Essendon and took three quarters to shake off a Freo side missing 3 of its best 5 players in Fyfe, McPharlin and Sandi.
 
I don't know about all that.

Game style- clearly Hawthorn. Best field kicking side in the comp. Can cut you to bits. Adelaide's game style is a replica of Collingwood's and I don't think we have the best game style unfortunately- despite probably having the best personnel.

Coach- Love Sando over Clarko but cannot agree. One is a premiership coach the other is a rookie coach.

Defence- 50/50 split.

Midfield- 50/50 again. Dangerfield, Thompson and Sloane v Hodge, Lewis and Mitchell.

Ruck- definitely Adelaide.

Forwards- Hawks. Buddy, Roughy, Rioli all superstars and freaks. Breust is coming along quite well too and add Gunston it is arguably the best mix in the comp. Tippett and Walker quality too but not as deep as Hawks.
Disagree with defence. Hawks KPDs are very suspect where we have 3 quality ones along with Doughty, and Reilly and Mackay running the ball out with precision.

Forwardline also has, Jenkins, Porplyzia, Callinan, Vince.

I know you dont think these players are as good as they are bu thats simply due to them not getting the Vic media attention and getting talked up something cruel...
 
Just mentioning we have won the most games this year... I know it doesn't mean much but it's something. To place us outside of the top 4 is laughable.

You were also kissed on the dick with your draw too, good luck to em for that I guess (it will never be fair) but the finals are a different story and the Crows will be found out badly imo.
 
Swans are definitely top 4 quality (though their forward line is a shambles without Reid there) but I'm not sold on the Crows. I don't think they'll beat Collingwood or Hawthorn in a final, even at AAMI. I'd be confident about Geelong having to potentially play them in a semi final. Crows also seem to be winding down - they were comfortably beaten by a Geelong team a few players short of its best, pushed to the wire by an undermanned Essendon and took three quarters to shake off a Freo side missing 3 of its best 5 players in Fyfe, McPharlin and Sandi.
Yet you ignore the Adelaide outs.
The only reason we didnt flog Freo was due to inaccurate kicking. And how can you see it took 3 quarters to 'shake off Freo' but you 'comfortably beat' us. lol
 
Its way more than that. They only play one return game against anybody from the top ten last season.
I don't see how. There are four discretionary return games (the Port game is a lock).
So here is their list:
01 Gellong
11 Freo
17 GC
18 GWS

Swap out GC for Essendon and it looks like:

01 Gellong
08 Essendon
11 Freo
18 GWS
So over-all two Top 8 and three bottom 10 teams. Hard to complain about that fixture for a 14th placed team.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You were also kissed on the dick with your draw too, good luck to em for that I guess (it will never be fair) but the finals are a different story and the Crows will be found out badly imo.

We are 2nd on the ladder before we even get 3 of our "guaranteed wins"(not what I think) in the next few weeks. Sure we have a easier draw than most, sorry for winning- but if you remove Bris, Melb and Suns from our draw we would be in the ballpark with many other teams (where we are at now).
 
Yet you ignore the Adelaide outs.
The only reason we didnt flog Freo was due to inaccurate kicking. And how can you see it took 3 quarters to 'shake off Freo' but you 'comfortably beat' us. lol

We were in front at quarter despite kicking into a strong breeze, built a five goal lead kicking with it in the second quarter. You wiped out that deficit kicking with it in the third. We won by around that margin after coming home with it. I'd say that's a pretty clear cut case of us being a better side overall.

Genuine question, who were you missing v Freo on the weekend? Tippett, Porplyzia... anyone else?
 
Adelaide have been gifted a friendly draw, but they have been good enough to take advantage of it. IMHO they would be top 4 or very close to it even without the draw tilting their way, but probably not top 2. Most Crows fans I know accept that.

Sydney - not sure why people still don't rate a team which has had a very average draw and is top of the ladder with a huge percentage after this many rounds of footy.

Sydney have had little or no respect all year.

we live in a bizzare world where some teams who play in the same state 15+ odd times are considered better than a team what plays in 1 state 12-13 times because they draw is rigged...
 
Or trade your games for the teams we play twice. Geelong, Sydney, West Coast & Collingwood. With our draw, you probably wouldn't even make the 8.

What are you talking about, mate? I thought we were shit.

Jesus christ, you can't even stay consistent over about 5 posts.

Anyway, we probably won't finish top 2. If we do manage to beat the Hawks (who are apparently the best team in the competition) and Geelong (who I presume you and Mick have in mind to replace the Swans/Crows in the top 4?) twice in a season, I'd say a top 2 finish is reasonable. It would mean the only side we didn't beat all year was Collingwood.

In short, sorry the team supported dropped some easy games earlier in the year, and so aren't in the top 2. They'll probably be ok in the finals, I imagine. Stop sooking, you big ****ing baby.
 
Ridiculous fixture not only effected the ladder, could also have huge bearing on Brownlow
images
 
Disagree with defence. Hawks KPDs are very suspect where we have 3 quality ones along with Doughty, and Reilly and Mackay running the ball out with precision.

Forwardline also has, Jenkins, Porplyzia, Callinan, Vince.

I know you dont think these players are as good as they are bu thats simply due to them not getting the Vic media attention and getting talked up something cruel...

Nothing to do with the "media attention or lack of", I watch most games, particularly the sides in finals contention.

I agree Hawks KPDs are suspect but their smaller blokes are better. Birchall, Suckling, Guerra---now that is running the ball out with precision. Adelaide trio of Doughty, Reilly and Mackay good but not as good as Hawks smalls.

Good mix of forward options but short on the quality the Hawks possess IMO in terms of depth.
 
What are you talking about, mate? I thought we were shit.

Jesus christ, you can't even stay consistent over about 5 posts.

I didn't say you were shit. I just said you don't deserve to be top 2. You're still a decent-ish side. Just agreeing with Malthouse, that's all.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Swans, Crows not top two: Malthouse

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top