Deadly Assassin
Senior List
- Aug 25, 2013
- 285
- 575
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
I didn't realise Brisbane Bears and Brisbane Lions were two different clubs?Here’s a list of teams that Joel Selwood is better than:
View attachment 1517558
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't realise Brisbane Bears and Brisbane Lions were two different clubs?Here’s a list of teams that Joel Selwood is better than:
View attachment 1517558
Take that up with the legend who runs AFL Tables. Guy has contributed more to football statistics than you or I ever will.I didn't realise Brisbane Bears and Brisbane Lions were two different clubs?
Clubs are free to market themselves however they want. If a club wants to claim that they’ve won 11 flags because they won nine in the VFA between 1898 and 1924 while other clubs were busy playing in a higher division they can. There’s no one policing it. But they might lose a bit of respect.I think all clubs should be able to count premierships from all their history since their inception. The logic would be that you can only play in the competition you are in at the time. So in the dogs case, they would be 11 wins, 7 losses I think.
Carlton is around 22 premierships , but Port Adelaide has the most by far from Memory around 35.
St Kilda's record is the most tragic, especially when you count the wooden spoons too
Melbourne = 13/19 (68.4%)So what does it look like IF we include replays?
Don't seem to recall Richmond being in too many grand finals since the comp went national. I do remember them losing to 9th in a final however....It seems only mentally soft sides know for losing final such as Port Power, St Kilda, Collingwood and Sydney lose grand finals to Geelong
Sydney's/South Melbourne's record in grand finals is pretty poor to say the least..
As South Melbourne... they won 3 grand finals while losing 8.
As Sydney... they've won 2 grand finals while losing 5.
Only Collingwood, Essendon and Carlton have lost as many or more grand finals.. and these are the three most successful clubs in V/AFL history when it comes to winning premierships.
Why haven't the Swans come under media scrutiny for their record in grand finals??
I hope Geelong posters aren't going to go all Richmond BF on us. Come on, you can be better than that!Here’s a list of teams that Joel Selwood is better than:
View attachment 1517558
I’m all done being cocky matey!I hope Geelong posters aren't going to go all Richmond BF on us. Come on, you can be better than that!
You would not want to be a Richmond fan between 1983 to 2012.Don't seem to recall Richmond being in too many grand finals since the comp went national. I do remember them losing to 9th in a final however....
Really?Keep things in perspective. I think it is silly to scrutinise team number 2 more than teams 3-18. They were better than everyone except Geelong.
Why even bring the states into this… one team beat another team. It had nothing to do with where the respective sides come from.Well it was a horrific grand final.
Good for Geelong.
But again the Victorian team smashed the non Victorian side yet again.
Carlton are more likely..... Hell north, hell bloody Essendon will get a flag before the dockers , if the Dockers actually get one in my lifetime
You would not want to be a Richmond fan between 1983 to 2012.
Since the final 8 system from 1994 onwards, They finished 9th in 1994, 1996, 1998 , 2000, 2006 and 2008. That's 6 times.
Turn those 9th placed spots into 8th and that's a bare minimum 6 finals they would of played.
Still.... Had that happen they would of had a solid run from 1990-2001 making finals In 1994-6, 1998 and 2000-01.
Guys like Matty Richardson, Brendan Gale, Wayne Campbell and Matty Knights careers would of been looked way better had that happened
Good analysis. Tigers on paper were a pretty good side from 1994 to 2001. Bowden, Broderick, Gaspar, Daffy, Kellaway were all fine contributors too.You would not want to be a Richmond fan between 1983 to 2012.
Since the final 8 system from 1994 onwards, They finished 9th in 1994, 1996, 1998 , 2000, 2006 and 2008. That's 6 times.
Turn those 9th placed spots into 8th and that's a bare minimum 6 finals they would of played.
Still.... Had that happen they would of had a solid run from 1990-2001 making finals In 1994-6, 1998 and 2000-01.
Guys like Matty Richardson, Brendan Gale, Wayne Campbell and Matty Knights careers would of been looked way better had that happened
Really?
Well it was a horrific grand final.
Good for Geelong.
But again the Victorian team smashed the non Victorian side yet again.
Carlton are more likely..... Hell north, hell bloody Essendon will get a flag before the dockers , if the Dockers actually get one in my lifetime
Ah, so it's not really about Sydney's record, it's about you being pissy and salty about Geelong getting credit for winning.All the media are acting as the Geelong cheersquad.. ignoring the fact Sydney rolled over and turned up their toes yet again on the big stage!!!
Ah, so it's not really about Sydney's record, it's about you being pissy and salty about Geelong getting credit for winning.
A for honesty, I guess.
It is impressive to have made so many Grand Finals. I love knocking on the Pies, but they are always giving themselves a chance. I read somewhere that they have never won a Grand Final when they didn't finish 1st or 2nd. It is a testament that they make Grand Finals that they probably shouldn't have, (given they were not in the top 2 teams for the season) rather than being poor in the big dance.He's referring to Collingwood's Grand Final record, but he formatted it incorrectly.
15 wins, 2 draws, 27 losses = 44 Grand Finals
Someone is up and about after the Grand Final! Enjoy the Cats flag, I know I enjoyed the Tigers in 17,19 and 20. Beat the Cats in all those years. Just need a Semi final win and we have the full set.Don't seem to recall Richmond being in too many grand finals since the comp went national. I do remember them losing to 9th in a final however....
Youd have to win an EF to make the semiSomeone is up and about after the Grand Final! Enjoy the Cats flag, I know I enjoyed the Tigers in 17,19 and 20. Beat the Cats in all those years. Just need a Semi final win and we have the full set.
Given your current flag, and our recent finals dominance against you we can both be happy.Youd have to win an EF to make the semi
Ummm, wow.
So they're 3-8 and 2-5, overall 5-13
Here's a figure for you op if you want to 'scrutinize' a club
15-2-44. Pretty sure you'll work it out.
Not even sure how this is a thread.
Grand Final winning % (excluding replays)
Brisbane Lions = 3/4 (75.0%)
Melbourne = 13/18 (72.2%)
Hawthorn = 13/19 (68.4%)
Adelaide = 2/3 (66.7%)
Fitzroy = 8/13 (61.5%)
West Coast = 4/7 (57.1%)
Carlton = 16/29 (55.2%)
Richmond = 13/24 (54.2%)
Geelong = 10/19 (52.6%)
Essendon = 14/28 (50.0%) - 1897 and 1924 didn't have a GF.
Western Bulldogs = 2/4 (50.0%)
Port Adelaide = 1/2 (50.0%)
North Melbourne = 4/9 (44.4%)
Collingwood = 15/42 (35.7%)
Sydney = 5/18 (27.8%) - includes South Melbourne record
St Kilda = 1/7 (14.3%)
Fremantle = 0/1 (0.0%)
GWS = 0/1 (0.0%)
Not trying to kick the Swans while they're down, but it's always surprised me this record doesn't get talked about more in the media compared to Collingwood and St Kilda for example.
Isn't 44 the number of GFs Collingwood have qualified for, rather than the number they've lost? i.e. they've only lost 29 (only!). Their GF winning ratio is better than the Swans'.