- Jan 12, 2011
- 25,405
- 35,588
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Ok, we are starting to move into a different discussion (which I believe is well worth having) but the AFL have said from the get go GWS are a 20 year proposition and will be funded for at least that amount of time.BJ, I agree with you if you look at it as a straight trade but it is not.
GWS are an embarrassment to the AFL and a major drain on finances. They missed the deal to get Buddy and have not been able to attract big names to the club. Shaw whilst not a big name, is someone they have decided they want, and have offered him a big contract, well above his worth as they realise that's what is required to get him to nominate them.
As such they need to get this deal done. Maybe they pay a little more than what they think he is worth to get it done and prove they can get players who want to come over the line. Its still a win for them, they are not being bent over.
A drain? probably, but it has been factored into their "success" by the AFL
They have so much talent on their list along with future years of getting good draft picks (and concessions) they can afford to (in your words) ****-up occasionally.
You say they are not being bent over, clearly they think they are or the deal would have been done.
Personally I think it is a fair deal, but it matters zip, what I think. GWS have to believe its fair