- Oct 21, 2009
- 4,984
- 33
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- SD, Liverpool, Patriots, SA Spurs
- Banned
- #101
This is also a concern for me.I would but I'm afraid you might find my facebook.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The 2011 Summer Transfer Rumors thread
- Thread starter Coledinho
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Banned
- #103
They are Spurs.
So, probably about 8m, since no-one can turn down the opportunity to play for Spurs and Villareal would be stupid to turn down any bids from Spurs, they'd get a good rep throughout world football for being good to do business with once they get their name associated with a transfer involving Spurs.
So, probably about 8m, since no-one can turn down the opportunity to play for Spurs and Villareal would be stupid to turn down any bids from Spurs, they'd get a good rep throughout world football for being good to do business with once they get their name associated with a transfer involving Spurs.
- Oct 21, 2009
- 4,984
- 33
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- SD, Liverpool, Patriots, SA Spurs
- Banned
- #104
What basis do you have for that?
When did in Embers post did he say they would bid for Rossi? He was just asking a question, not petitioning Fergie to bid 35m for Rossi you idiot. Not that you could actually get Rossi anyway, way out of your league.
- Banned
- #105
They have a sell on clause! Meaning, they get a % of any fee that Villareal sell him for.
At no point was the first option clause mentioned. (Which apparently they also have).
- Thread starter
- #106
I said sell on clause not buyback option ie. Man United receive X perrcent of the total sale price hence increasing the transfer fee when sold
- Banned
- #108
I think he was talking to GB with his last post, but I could be wrong too.
Good to have you back here as well Jolldo.
- Banned
- #110
Oh, right. Got confused between the two.
- Thread starter
- #111
Nah I was talking to GB
Jollo is right it seems. Villareal have a buyback option and not the sell on clause like I thought
Jollo is right it seems. Villareal have a buyback option and not the sell on clause like I thought
- Banned
- #112
I would but I'm afraid you might find my facebook.
Now why on earth would you thing that?!?!?
Well you're still in school.
You idiot
- Thread starter
- #114
He disappears then re appears as the new Tottenham substitute B.Bag.
- Banned
- #115
The major reason Carroll signed for Liverpool was money.
He would've stayed with us if we offered him the same money Liverpool did - hardly what I'd call going to Liverpool 'for the step up' as most Liverpool fans want to believe.
Enrique is gone in the summer, probably to Spain or Italy, but he won't go to a team that isn't playing Champions League football.
He would've stayed with us if we offered him the same money Liverpool did - hardly what I'd call going to Liverpool 'for the step up' as most Liverpool fans want to believe.
Enrique is gone in the summer, probably to Spain or Italy, but he won't go to a team that isn't playing Champions League football.
- Banned
- #117
Nope, Carroll heard through his agent what Liverpool were going to offer him and went to Newcastle and said 'can you match it?'... but having just signed a new deal himself in October, the club refused to give in and said if he wanted that much, he'd have to go to Liverpool to get it.
Then Carroll handed in his transfer request and here we are.
Then Carroll handed in his transfer request and here we are.
- Banned
- #118
JW pretty much got it.
He tried to call the clubs bluff, but the club didn't move because deep down we wanted to accept the offer - and it would also look shit to the rest of the players if we gave him a new contract after only having his for 3 months.
- Thread starter
- #119
Will be interesting to see what Newcastle do in the summer. Think Pardrew has a bit of a dilemna on his hands as far as what system to eventually play. He loves his 4-4-2 but his squad will best suit a 4-4-1-1 at present. Whatever he decides will dictate the transfer activity. If it was up to me Id play a 4-4-1-1 and really chase after a unrealistic signature ie. Karim Benzema. Id say Newcastle are deadset certainties to buy Stephen Warnock and will probably take Matthew Upson now I think about it. Something like
Harper
Simpson Williamson Colocinni Warnock
Barton Nolan Tiote Jonas
Ben Arfa
Benzema
Krul, Taylor, Upson, ???, ???. ???, ???. Best
With a bit more spent to add depth to the overall squad.
Harper
Simpson Williamson Colocinni Warnock
Barton Nolan Tiote Jonas
Ben Arfa
Benzema
Krul, Taylor, Upson, ???, ???. ???, ???. Best
With a bit more spent to add depth to the overall squad.
In the Corriere dello Sport
Google Translations gives this as "Manchester United assault a shepherd".
I blame Ryan Giggs.
Google Translations gives this as "Manchester United assault a shepherd".
I blame Ryan Giggs.
- Banned
- #121
No chance in hell we'll sign Benzema, would want far too much money.
- Thread starter
- #122
Doesnt Colocinni earn like 70k a week
. Im sure you would stump up a extra 20k a week for a marquee type signing
- Banned
- #123
Coloccini is on £70k a week, but he won't be getting it again. He was offered that before the financial state of the club was known by Mike Ashley.
We've got a £50,000 a week ceiling on all new signings - could be stretched to £60-£65k a week depending on the player but there's no way we'll be offering anyone close to £100k per week.
We've got a £50,000 a week ceiling on all new signings - could be stretched to £60-£65k a week depending on the player but there's no way we'll be offering anyone close to £100k per week.
- Thread starter
- #124
Surely the big money coming in for Carroll/Enrique along with the success of recent signings the club could afford to splurge abit. 50k a week ceiling wont even get ya Carlton Cole.
- Status
Similar threads
