Thongdam
Debutant
Check out this link http://www.smh.com.au/news/afl/revealed-how-the-swans-bought-the-flag/2006/06/08/1149359890886.html
It shows that the gap between rich and poor teams is pretty big...the Swans spent $4.75 million more on players and their football department than did the Kangaroos.
Also there are big differences in payments to coaching staff with West Coast well on top, followed by Essendon and the Pies. Richmond and Hawthorn run a long last.
Will the widening gap give richer clubs sustained success on the field?
Where is the AFL as a competition heading with this growing inequity?
It shows that the gap between rich and poor teams is pretty big...the Swans spent $4.75 million more on players and their football department than did the Kangaroos.
Also there are big differences in payments to coaching staff with West Coast well on top, followed by Essendon and the Pies. Richmond and Hawthorn run a long last.
Will the widening gap give richer clubs sustained success on the field?
Where is the AFL as a competition heading with this growing inequity?