Conspiracy Theory The Attempted Assassination of Donald Trump

Remove this Banner Ad

Wut?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hinckley_Jr.

I have no idea what this dudes politics were, but he shot Reagan because 'he wanted to impress (actress) Jodie Foster' who he was infatuated with, and was (understandably) found to be not guilty by reason of insanity at trial.

How the **** you're claiming that as connected to some kind of coherent political belief is beyond me.
Reagan got a reminder to be careful what he talks about. It was effective.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

When you live in an echo chamber sometimes you forget the cameras are rolling.


Speaking of which, at least one intelligence agency put a lot of research into mind control during the Cold War.

We otherwise can't explain why the "Republican" Crooks tried to kill Trump - but some of the signs are there.

Look into the history of psychological warfare, manipulation, hypnosis, subliminal messaging, etc.
 
Leaked cell phone call between Robert Kennedy Jr and Trump. About Trump suggesting Kennedy drop out and join Trump's staff because Trump is going to win in a landslide, also related to dangers of vaccinations so Kennedy can have more influence on Trump's staff that way.

Also....a new "reports" of Iranian plot to assassinate Trunp.
 
A bloke tried to assassinate Trump in 2016 but he couldn’t get the gun off a police officer while wrestling with the cop who had the gun in their holster.
Oh, that changes everything then, aLeX jOnEs wAz rIgHt!!1 :tearsofjoy:

Some of Alex's other predictions;
  • EU dissolved by 2020
  • 15 European nations collapse by June 2012
  • US dollar will devalue by 90% in 2 years
  • Martial law months away in the US
  • Staged assassination attempt of Obama, to be blamed on a Tea Party affiliate
  • WW3, constantly
  • Biological weapon attacks in the US, constantly
  • a 2nd US civil war, constantly
  • False flag attacks, constantly
  • Media will officially announce extra-terrestrial life in 2009
  • The movie "Machete" will start a race war :tearsofjoy:
 
Yep, truly unprecedented and horrifying rhetoric :rolleyes:



1721029066460-png.2049232

Noticed you reacted to this post with the love emoji, mate.

Stokey will be most disappointed with you supporting this extreme rhetoric :(
 
Oh, that changes everything then, aLeX jOnEs wAz rIgHt!!1 :tearsofjoy:

Some of Alex's other predictions;
  • EU dissolved by 2020
  • 15 European nations collapse by June 2012
  • US dollar will devalue by 90% in 2 years
  • Martial law months away in the US
  • Staged assassination attempt of Obama, to be blamed on a Tea Party affiliate
  • WW3, constantly
  • Biological weapon attacks in the US, constantly
  • a 2nd US civil war, constantly
  • False flag attacks, constantly
  • Media will officially announce extra-terrestrial life in 2009
  • The movie "Machete" will start a race war :tearsofjoy:
Nice rant. I didn’t say that AJ was right. Just brought up the deranged lunatics attempt to steal a cop’s gun and shoot Trump.
Ask Chief about AJ. He said on SRP after the Trump mystery shooting that he was an avid Jones listener. Maybe he said that he needed to find out what AJ was sprouting now. Who knows. 😂
 
Noticed you reacted to this post with the love emoji, mate.

Stokey will be most disappointed with you supporting this extreme rhetoric :(
You are being facepalmingly dumb as per usual.

Was this after the attempted assassination?

Both sides need to tone down the rhetoric. I posted examples where this doesn't seem to being heeded and in fact ramped up.



Just out of interest what is your take on Cenk and the Destiny character in this clip?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You'd think it would more be related to Trump taking out Soleimani, than Vance's positions?
I think the Iran assassination stuff is pure fiction.
No country is that stupid to attempt that on American soil,let alone set up the logistics to pull it off.
Vance on the other hand just letting Israel know that they'll land a blow on Iran for them.
Screenshot_20240717_080305_Samsung Internet.jpg
Yoram Hazony fanboi
 
You are being facepalmingly dumb as per usual.
Dumber than Lebbo73 or Dan Moody? Debatable.

You're the one calling for toned down rhetoric mate, those 2 are apparently happier than pigs in shit for that plea to be disregarded, I would have thought your issue would be with them? Pretty simple.

Both sides need to tone down the rhetoric. I posted examples where this doesn't seem to being heeded and in fact ramped up.


Ahh yes, you're calling for toned down rhetoric and have now just slipped in for the first time that "both sides" need to do this, while still focusing exclusively on examples from teh left, very convincing (skipper kelly guilty of this too). Like its some new phenomenon that just started with Trump :drunk:

Meanwhile back in 2008



"march to socialism"
"end of capitalism as we know it"
"fascism"
"communism"
"the Manchurian candidate couldn't destroy us faster than Obama"
"Stalin without the bloodshed"
not to mention birtherism, terrorist fist bump and secret muslim

Some pretty extreme rhetoric from MSM there, who woulda thunk eh? And I can't remember Obama even calling his political enemies 'vermin' lol



Just out of interest what is your take on Cenk and the Destiny character in this clip?

I watched the first minute intro, a lot of edits and cross-talk, couldn't really make out what they were on about apart from this Destiny character refusing to condemn the assassination attempt as an attack on democracy, which I'd agree on the face of it is pretty average although some context would be good. Cenk seems like he's arguing against Piers' saying the shooting was 'odd', possibly Piers was going with some kind of deep state plot angle which absolutely deserves to be pushed back against but again, I don't have the full context so hard to comment.

Are there some specific parts in the hour long video you'd like the draw my attention to? Give me some timestamps and I'll watch them.
 
Last edited:
Dumber than Lebbo73 or Dan Moody? Debatable.

You're the one calling for toned down rhetoric mate, those 2 are apparently happier than pigs in shit for that plea to be disregarded, I would have thought your issue would be with them? Pretty simple.


Ahh yes, you're calling for toned down rhetoric and have now just slipped in for the first time that "both sides" need to do this, while still focusing exclusively on examples from teh left, very convincing (skipper kelly guilty of this too). Like its some new phenomenon that just started with Trump :drunk:

Meanwhile back in 2008



"march to socialism"
"end of capitalism as we know it"
"fascism"
"communism"
"the Manchurian candidate couldn't destroy us faster than Obama"
"Stalin without the bloodshed"
not to mention birtherism, terrorist fist bump and secret muslim

Some pretty extreme rhetoric from MSM there, who woulda thunk eh? And I can't remember Obama even calling his political enemies 'vermin' lol


I watched the first minute intro, a lot of edits and cross-talk, couldn't really make out what they were on about apart from this Destiny character refusing to condemn the assassination attempt as an attack on democracy, which I'd agree on the face of it is pretty average although some context would be good. Cenk seems like he's arguing against Piers' saying the shooting was 'odd', possibly Piers was going with some kind of deep state plot angle which absolutely deserves to be pushed back against but again, I don't have the full context so hard to comment.

Are there some specific parts in the hour long video you'd like the draw my attention to? Give me some timestamps and I'll watch them.

So the suggestion was for both sides to tone down the rhetoric since the assassination attempt and you post something from 2008 to try and prove your point. <Insert multiple laughing emojis>

Seriously mate. Never change. Good to know I can keep you on ignore.
 
So the suggestion was for both sides to tone down the rhetoric since the assassination attempt and you post something from 2008 to try and prove your point. <Insert multiple laughing emojis>

Seriously mate. Never change. Good to know I can keep you on ignore.
Part 738 of me completing dismantling a supposed position of yours. Oh so concerned about extreme rhetoric now that someone has taken a shot at your guy, not a single **** given previously about that same guy's extreme rhetoric resulting in stuff like J6, or your side's extreme rhetoric in general going back decades. Never change indeed :tearsofjoy:

I can see why you'd like to go the ignore route rather than debate and discuss in good faith, being exposed like this time and time again would be pretty embarrassing.
 
Part 738 of me completing dismantling a supposed position of yours. Oh so concerned about extreme rhetoric now that someone has taken a shot at your guy, not a single **** given previously about that same guy's extreme rhetoric resulting in stuff like J6, or your side's extreme rhetoric in general going back decades. Never change indeed :tearsofjoy:

I can see why you'd like to go the ignore route rather than debate and discuss in good faith, being exposed like this time and time again would be pretty embarrassing.
It's a shame that an attempted kidnapping and a hammer attack weren't enough of a trigger to tone the rhetoric down.
 
Part 738 of me completing dismantling a supposed position of yours. Oh so concerned about extreme rhetoric now that someone has taken a shot at your guy, not a single **** given previously about that same guy's extreme rhetoric resulting in stuff like J6, or your side's extreme rhetoric in general going back decades. Never change indeed :tearsofjoy:

I can see why you'd like to go the ignore route rather than debate and discuss in good faith, being exposed like this time and time again would be pretty embarrassing.
No it's embarrassing for you.

Why can't you acknowledge that the rhetoric needs to be lowered? You sound like the red bull guzzling idiot in the clip you refused to watch.

I think both sides have been guilty of stoking the fire of hatred in the US and I think it's reached a point where both sides acknowledge it needs to be wound back.

It remains to be seen if either do but if that Destiny moron is anything to go by nothing is going to change.

Now see if you can stay in the present.
 
I think both sides have been guilty of stoking the fire of hatred in the US and I think it's reached a point where both sides acknowledge it needs to be wound back.

On this we agree.

I've actually been impressed by Trump not going full divisive mode, more so seeing as he was the one being shot at.
 
Better :thumbsu:

No it's embarrassing for you.

Why can't you acknowledge that the rhetoric needs to be lowered?
Its the idea that Democrats need to lead this that's ridiculous (again, you've only injected the "both sides need to" now, once called on it). I'm fully on board with it, lowering the rhetoric is a great idea, its been a great idea ever since Fox and Trump conscientiously raised it to fever pitch.

How many times do you think Trump has called his political opponents fascist/marxist/scum on Truth Social this year? Are you even aware of that? Do you accept that he called his political opponents vermin, and used language literally lifted from Hitler speeches? Are the Democrats and media just supposed to ignore that, not note it, in an election year?

You sound like the red bull guzzling idiot in the clip you refused to watch.
I refused to watch an hour long video, oh how unreasonable of me.
Are there some specific parts in the hour long video you'd like the draw my attention to? Give me some timestamps and I'll watch them.
Any time you're ready mate. If Piers' line is anything like yours, the red bull guzzling idiot's apparent response is becoming more reasonable by the minute - like I said, context.

I think both sides have been guilty of stoking the fire of hatred in the US and I think it's reached a point where both sides acknowledge it needs to be wound back.

It remains to be seen if either do but if that Destiny moron is anything to go by nothing is going to change.
Both sides as of now, sure, but not equally and pretty clear who went there first.

I'm not sure ascribing the position of a red bull guzzling idiot to an entire party or spectrum of politics is all that helpful, to put it mildly.

Now see if you can stay in the present.
Happy to be here mate, lets see if we both can. I'd appreciate a response to the questions I've asked above.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Conspiracy Theory The Attempted Assassination of Donald Trump

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top