The best teams at NOT going back to back

Remove this Banner Ad

No adjustments? For a 17 game season. Are you an idiot?

I like that you are using W/L record and % to assess how good a team is. We have the MCG win streak record and largest GF win % record. That’s why we’d beat anybody at the MCG especially in GFs. Cheers, now sit down son and stick with the thread.
You can't assume that Ports win rate would stay the same in a season of normal length with undetermined double ups. Well you could assume that if you were a moron. I'm not accusing you of being that, this is just a hypothetical.

And I also showed that even if you did apply this terrible extrapolation, after finals Hawthorn's record was superior.

Richmond is very lucky they did not have to face the 2008 Hawks, who were a considerably stronger side than the 2018 Pies who spanked you.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

No adjustments? For a 17 game season. Are you an idiot?

I like that you are using W/L record and % to assess how good a team is. We have the MCG win streak record and largest GF win % record. That’s why we’d beat anybody at the MCG especially in GFs. Cheers, now sit down son and stick with the thread.
Who were the strong Melbourne based teams Richmond defeated 2017-2020? There are none. 2008 Hawthorn, 2009 St Kilda and 2011 Collingwood would've given them a good old fashioned spanking.
 
But they had Ling the greatest tagger in the world. Was he on Buddy and Roughy was he? 🤣

When Cooney wins the 08 Brownlow that other guy has no right to say Dusty wouldn’t get a kick in that era due to taggers.

It’s also not surpising the Geelong people laughed at my comment. They have to to save face. Their best team wasn’t even as good as the 08 hawks and thus would get wrecked by most premiers let alone dynasty teams.
Buddy was robbed of the Brownlow that year. Also Gaz Jnr and Bartel …badly awarded Brownlows should not represent the general talent of the comp
 
You can't assume that Ports win rate would stay the same in a season of normal length with undetermined double ups. Well you could assume that if you were a moron. I'm not accusing you of being that, this is just a hypothetical.

And I also showed that even if you did apply this terrible extrapolation, after finals Hawthorn's record was superior.

Richmond is very lucky they did not have to face the 2008 Hawks, who were a considerably stronger side than the 2018 Pies who spanked you.

If we were fully fit you’d have a point. But Dusty was on one leg and the defence had gastro.

I won’t even get into your stupid can’t assume crap. They could’ve gone undefeated as well hence why we use the average.

Hawks are a great side I agree, better than 07-11 Geelong. But fortunately they will not be regarded as better than us in the record books and thus every other dynasty team will also be considered better than Geelong. It’s so good
 
No adjustments? For a 17 game season. Are you an idiot?

I like that you are using W/L record and % to assess how good a team is. We have the MCG win streak record and largest GF win % record. That’s why we’d beat anybody at the MCG especially in GFs. Cheers, now sit down son and stick with the thread.
I think looking at the validity of whether a team is actually back to back is an important question to consider
 
Last edited:
You can't assume that Ports win rate would stay the same in a season of normal length with undetermined double ups. Well you could assume that if you were a moron. I'm not accusing you of being that, this is just a hypothetical.

And I also showed that even if you did apply this terrible extrapolation, after finals Hawthorn's record was superior.

Richmond is very lucky they did not have to face the 2008 Hawks, who were a considerably stronger side than the 2018 Pies who spanked you.
Case in point - 1989 was almost NOT B2B due to Hawthorn running completely out of tickets in the second half. The longer the season the harder it is (clearly) to go B2B. Due to the length of the season - and the normal length of quarters - Geelong very nearly got over the line with a very spirited effort from Gaz Snr. It was so close. Agonisingly close.

It’s completely fair game IMO to question Richmond’s B2B based on this painful painful memory for Cats fans
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If we were fully fit you’d have a point. But Dusty was on one leg and the defence had gastro.

I won’t even get into your stupid can’t assume crap. They could’ve gone undefeated as well hence why we use the average.

Hawks are a great side I agree, better than 07-11 Geelong. But fortunately they will not be regarded as better than us in the record books and thus every other dynasty team will also be considered better than Geelong. It’s so good
The excuses for the 2018 PF disaster reaching mythical legend status
 
If we were fully fit you’d have a point. But Dusty was on one leg and the defence had gastro.

I won’t even get into your stupid can’t assume crap. They could’ve gone undefeated as well hence why we use the average.

Hawks are a great side I agree, better than 07-11 Geelong. But fortunately they will not be regarded as better than us in the record books and thus every other dynasty team will also be considered better than Geelong. It’s so good
I am actually happy that you are happy. I mean it. Why ruin someone else’s happiness. It’s a cheap thing to do and I am quite pluralistic with respect to belief systems generally
 
Richmonds 4peat undone by upset tummys
Sounds like a load of shit. Get it?

Captain America Lol GIF by mtv
 
2008 Hawks had an underrated nucleus and a super coach/game plan.

Franklin (100 plus goals)
Roughead (70 plus goals)
Hodge
Mitchell
Rioli
Sewell
Crawford
Lewis
Bateman
Dew
Croad
Birchall
Brown
Williams
Guerra

Then Young, Ellis, Osborne etc all stood up that year especially in the big games.

The Cats absolutely should've beaten them. But the form they were in and the chemistry that side had by the end of the year - I'd back them to give any side 2016 onwards a hell of a game.

People underrate them because a) they were underdogs in the GF and b) they lost their way a bit before reshaping into their (better) dynasty side.
If we were fully fit you’d have a point. But Dusty was on one leg and the defence had gastro.

I won’t even get into your stupid can’t assume crap. They could’ve gone undefeated as well hence why we use the average.

Hawks are a great side I agree, better than 07-11 Geelong. But fortunately they will not be regarded as better than us in the record books and thus every other dynasty team will also be considered better than Geelong. It’s so good
Well except for the fact a poll was ran on this exact topic and Richmond were last by a country mile. In fact I don't think even one neutral rated for Richmond as the best dynasty side this century. Which is why people laugh when they are brought up to compare to the other three this century. And why the merged teams snob their players. They never beat a great side. Every other dynasty side did it at least once.
 
I am actually happy that you are happy. I mean it. Why ruin someone else’s happiness. It’s a cheap thing to do and I am quite pluralistic with respect to belief systems generally
He's not happy though which is why he whinges and moans in every thread that each Richmond side/player didn't get the recognition they deserved. But then pretends they ARE held in such esteem. And then he melts down again when people tell him no. It's very entertaining. But he ain't a happy camper.
 
2008 Hawks had an underrated nucleus and a super coach/game plan.

Franklin (100 plus goals)
Roughead (70 plus goals)
Hodge
Mitchell
Rioli
Sewell
Crawford
Lewis
Bateman
Dew
Croad
Birchall
Brown
Williams
Guerra

Then Young, Ellis, Osborne etc all stood up that year especially in the big games.

The Cats absolutely should've beaten them. But the form they were in and the chemistry that side had by the end of the year - I'd back them to give any side 2016 onwards a hell of a game.

People underrate them because a) they were underdogs in the GF and b) they lost their way a bit before reshaping into their (better) dynasty side.

Well except for the fact a poll was ran on this exact topic and Richmond were last by a country mile. In fact I don't think even one neutral rated for Richmond as the best dynasty side this century. Which is why people laugh when they are brought up to compare to the other three this century. And why the merged teams snob their players. They never beat a great side. Every other dynasty side did it at least once.

In 20/30 years time you think a 3 in 5 team will be considered better than a 3peat or 3 in 4 team. Yeah good luck with that. 🤣

History will see us as the best MCG and GF team ever unless somebody beats it. So eat it.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The best teams at NOT going back to back

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top