Kurve
Moderator
- Dec 27, 2016
- 30,148
- 63,093
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #10
Here is: The Abduction of 4yo Cleo Smith
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With all the surveillance and Police presence in NW WA related to the ongoing Cleo disappearance investigations, there has probably never been a safer time for the children in the community up there (since the Australian overseas borders have been pretty much locked from the inside and outside, taking into account all the irregular regular pedos and child abusers either being locked in or locked out).
It's not like its the 1990's when the Claremont Killer (Bradley Robert Edwards) was able to get away for decades committing repeat offences.
Thoughts on the step father?
She actually said "Get the mother ... smack her a bit!"
omg I don't know whether to lol or be horrified
This guy's theory; having run a Statement Analysis on the parent's interview - (refer the recent YouTube post) is that...
A) The mother is totally innocent as to what's happened to Cleo...
B) He thought poorly of the stepdad describing Cleo as lazy
C) That perhaps the stepdad made Cleo stand outside the tent for an extended period of time as some form of punishment for being naughty...
D) That for some reason Cleo has missed/has not had her dinner, and now wherever she is, (the mother points to) > Cleo being in high need for breakfast, and toileting ...
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
He already knew his 1st wife during the Huntingdale series at the time as the girlfriend of his workmate Chris Nixon. He commenced his apprenticeship with Telecom in Jan 1986 and met Nixon then . BRE hooked up with her in August 1988 whilst Nixon was away in Geraldton attending the Sandhurst Run.Doubtful. He had already offended in Huntingdale prior to meeting his wife. Murder was probably mostly employed in order to avoid his victims identifying him.
I'm sure it was the Mum that said Cleo was lazy in the first interview, it surprised me as I've never heard of a 4 year old described as lazy before. Not judging, kids can be hard work!This guy's theory; having run a Statement Analysis on the parent's interview - (refer the recent YouTube post) is that...
A) The mother is totally innocent as to what's happened to Cleo...
B) He thought poorly of the stepdad describing Cleo as lazy
C) That perhaps the stepdad made Cleo stand outside the tent for an extended period of time as some form of punishment for being naughty...
D) That for some reason Cleo has missed/has not had her dinner, and now wherever she is, (the mother points to) > Cleo being in high need for breakfast, and toileting ...
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
She may have been at kindy/pre primary all day and was exhausted.The mum said Cleo had her dinner and went to bed before the toddler was fed and put down. I thought that was a bit odd but it might just have been a matter of convenience in that Cleo was easier to get down first.
Just watched it - sorry - what a waste of my time - and the side comments from people watching live are absolutely beyond horrific, he should have turned them off. It was like watching a lynch mob. Horrible, just horrible.
Just watched it - sorry - what a waste of my time - and the side comments from people watching live are absolutely beyond horrific, he should have turned them off. It was like watching a lynch mob. Horrible, just horrible.
oh.. i was just listening to the analysis, not looking at the commentary. The guy is supposed to be FBI trained. He looks for deceit in statements, I think the parents came out in a good light. Personally, i didn't pick up anything unusual in the mums responses, haven't heard enough from the step dad though.Just watched it - sorry - what a waste of my time - and the side comments from people watching live are absolutely beyond horrific, he should have turned them off. It was like watching a lynch mob. Horrible, just horrible.
It was also his incoherent blabbering, he could have done the whole thing in half the time!! Might just be me though.oh.. i was just listening to the analysis, not looking at the commentary. The guy is supposed to be FBI trained. He looks for deceit in statements, I think the parents came out in a good light. Personally, i didn't pick up anything unusual in the mums responses, haven't heard enough from the step dad though.
She started off okay, it was interesting in how she interpreted the cards then she got a bit over-excited.
She was reading Gypsy style with some sort of numerology twist.
This guy's theory; having run a Statement Analysis on the parent's interview - (refer the recent YouTube post) is that...
A) The mother is totally innocent as to what's happened to Cleo...
B) He thought poorly of the stepdad describing Cleo as lazy
C) That perhaps the stepdad made Cleo stand outside the tent for an extended period of time as some form of punishment for being naughty...
D) That for some reason Cleo has missed/has not had her dinner, and now wherever she is, (the mother points to) > Cleo being in high need for breakfast, and toileting ...
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk