If it was GWS then Hawks were in a position to do a much better deal by way of transfers.
Watch Sydney now try and negotiate away Buddies impact on their salary cap.
If we'd somehow nabbed the top pick, would we have gone for Boyd or Kelly I wonder
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
If it was GWS then Hawks were in a position to do a much better deal by way of transfers.
Watch Sydney now try and negotiate away Buddies impact on their salary cap.
They'll get let off and will cite COVID as the reason.
Bookmark this.
I agree that it will likely happen in some form. But there's no way it's going to go down quietly while Kennett is HFC President.I’ll lose my shit if that happens
I think it's entirely possible that the Swans will try to use "covid hardship" to get out of the salary cap issues they agreed to in order to sign him up.
Everyone knew at the time of signing that nine years was way too long. Heck, he still has three years to play out when all his playing cohorts - Roughhead, Lewis, Mitchell, Hodge - have retired. The Swans "back-ended" his contract, possibly with the cynical intent of minimising their exposure should he have to retire from injury. The AFL needs to show some integrity and refuse to relent. But I integrity is not a word they understand.
Maybe more?It's a 9 week hammy apparently. That's half his season gone. Gee whiz.
It's a 9 week hammy apparently. That's half his season gone. Gee whiz.
Pretty sure The Frenchman retired after the Eagles' Grand Final win.In fact, once the crazy offer was allowed (and remember for all the palaver, the AFL did not actually block it from happening, which they could have) free agency was not the factor. Could have gone to the PSD with that one. No club could or would match it
And Trav Cloke was in that draft - makes it really stark - Only Buddy and LeCras remain
Cv19 or not. I actually don't see it happening. It wld set a very dangerous precedent. Afl signed off on this, and made all sorts of statements that the swans wld have to keep it on the books no matter what. Yes Jeff wld go ape poopoo, but so wld many other clubs.They'll get let off and will cite COVID as the reason.
Bookmark this.
Yep very good point. Think of all the clubs who have had to pay out FAs tooCv19 or not. I actually don't see it happening. It wld set a very dangerous precedent. Afl signed off on this, and made all sorts of statements that the swans wld have to keep it on the books no matter what. Yes Jeff wld good ape poopoo, but so wld many other clubs.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
But its the AFL $wan$Cv19 or not. I actually don't see it happening. It wld set a very dangerous precedent. Afl signed off on this, and made all sorts of statements that the swans wld have to keep it on the books no matter what. Yes Jeff wld good ape poopoo, but so wld many other clubs.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
I can't see it mate. It'd sink the joint with new cap cuts on the way.Cv19 or not. I actually don't see it happening. It wld set a very dangerous precedent. Afl signed off on this, and made all sorts of statements that the swans wld have to keep it on the books no matter what. Yes Jeff wld good ape poopoo, but so wld many other clubs.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
AFL doesn't consider precedents (see MRP or Tribunal) & couldn't give a f*** about a few clubs mouthing off.Cv19 or not. I actually don't see it happening. It wld set a very dangerous precedent. Afl signed off on this, and made all sorts of statements that the swans wld have to keep it on the books no matter what. Yes Jeff wld good ape poopoo, but so wld many other clubs.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
I'd still love to see him kick a 1,000 goals