The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast *MB thread*

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

This whole issue of drugs in AFL, and of West Coast supposedly being the worst offenders, is a total beat-up.

Rumour and innuendo are no substitute for real evidence, but that hasn't stopped commentators from inflating this issue at every opportunity.

The Footy Show interview with West Coast chairman Dalton Gooding was presented as some kind of massive expose - maybe I missed it, but was anything actually revealed?

Gooding basically admitted their had been some discipline problems at the club, before saying the club wouldn't tolerate any more stuff-ups and that illicit drugs were unacceptable. What was the big revelation here? What else was he going to say? You'd get the same line on drugs and discipline from every chairman in the league.

This whole saga is marked as a beat-up by the complete lack of real information. I'm yet to see a shred of evidence that there is a "drug problem" in the AFL, or at West Coast or any other club.

Notice the way Hutchison kept referring to "a perception back East" that West Coast had a drug problem. That perception was emphasised because Hutchison had no actual evidence to use as a starting point for his questions. A perception - that's what's driving this beat-up.

I love the way commentators use "anecdotal evidence" to build their case. What does that phrase mean in this context? Rumour? Hearsay? In most reporting, that would not be sufficient to drive a story - but in this issue, that's considered a smoking gun.

Craig Hutchison spuriously linked Cousins getting locked up and Kerr assaulting a taxi driver with a supposed drug problem at West Coast. How does that work? Were drugs a factor in either incident?

Then there's the Fletcher incident. If anyone knows what happened in Las Vegas, then let's hear it. It's unsound to just assume it was a drug overdose in the absence of any real information?

Like I said - show me the evidence. Don't just recite unsubstantiated rumours or point to incidents that had nothing to do with drugs.

Quite frankly, I couldn't care less what Ben Cousins or any other player does or doesn't ingest in a nightclub. I have no interested whatsoever in this half-baked soap opera that surrounds players' off-field activities. The public appetite for this stuff mystifies me.

I thought most people follow football because they like the spectacle and the contest. Players will be judged on what they do on-field - and rightly so. Why is there such interest in everything else?

That said, the way this story about the "drug problem" has been manufactured needs to be pointed out.

People should demand some facts instead of just lapping up innuendo that feeds their dislike of the Eagles.
Ohh my, who looks silly now.
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

In a nutshell, you've just demonstrated why I'm better than you.

You simply don't have the imagination to ever get the better of me. Let alone the brains or the balls to make a compelling argument.

Run along.

Just becasue you say it doesn't make it so. Perhaps you could set up a poll? You have lost. Everything you say now is just gravy. Please, continue.
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

Watch as Longshanks stumbles around with a blissfull unawareness. In his mind he sails through the forums without a challenge, not because of some self proclaimed superior mental agility, but because everyone is far too busy amusing themselves at his expense. Longshanks remains convinced that he is hero for the masses, but is blind to the reality, as he simply cannot see through all the tickets he has on himself.

Brilliant retort 11/10:thumbsu:

"Gunnar" says it all really!....Mind boggling!

Google it! " Gunnar Longshanks" it used to be a reference to a fictional chararacter in series of book by a very C grade author but seems Gunnar has done some self promotion and bombarded Google with tripe?

Anyway this is NOT! made up. Google now, roll up, rollup and see the mind of a looooonatic
http://www.urbandictionary.com/author.php?author=Gunnar+Longshanks
Definitions by Gunnar Longshanks

4.nubilityJan 2, 2007The social class of teenage girls who win status through their blossoming...3.pedophakeJan 2, 2007When someone unwittingly lusts after a young boy/girl without knowing their age...2.splashbackJan 2, 20071. when the water from a toilet or a urinal splashes up or out and wets your...1.Hogan's GapJan 2, 2007The little square gap between the top of some girls' thighs. Most girls...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

Look all you guys should stop ganging up on Gunnar like a bunch of schoolyard bullies. It's time for someone to stand alongside him and in his defence say that
















Nope. Can't do it. Sorry Gunnar you are on your own.:eek:


BTW, we are eagerly awaiting your critique of the round 2 votes over on the West Coast board.
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

See cadet!!

The last two posters have something called credibilty. Look it up son.

And even though they feel obligated to support you, through their love of the Eagles, they just can't quite do it..

Do you know why cadet??

Because your name, and the embarrassment that goes hand in hand with that, is attatched to the post.

You have declared, to one and all, what an insignicant twat you are.

Suck it up!!


Ego boy!!
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

I think it's time this thread gets added to this list of predictions...
  • "I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people, and I can assure you that data processing is a fad that won't last out the year." -- The editor in charge of business books for Prentice Hall, 1957.
  • "But what...is it good for?" -- Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, 1968, commenting on the microchip.
  • "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." -- Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977.
  • "640K ought to be enough for anybody." -- Attributed to Bill Gates, 1981, but believed to be an urban legend.
  • "This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us." -- Western Union internal memo, 1876.
  • "The Americans have need of the telephone, but we do not. We have plenty of messenger boys." -- Sir William Preece, chief engineer of the British Post Office, 1876.
  • "The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?" -- David Sarnoff's associates in response to his urgings for investment in the radio in the 1920s.
  • "While theoretically and technically television may be feasible, commercially and financially it is an impossibility." -- Lee DeForest, inventor.
  • "The concept is interesting and well-formed, but in order to earn better than a 'C', the idea must be feasible." -- A Yale University management professor in response to Fred Smith's paper proposing reliable overnight delivery service. (Smith went on to found Federal Express Corp.)
  • "Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" -- H. M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927.
  • "I'm just glad it'll be Clark Gable who's falling on his face and not Gary Cooper." -- Gary Cooper on his decision not to take the leading role in "Gone With the Wind."
  • "A cookie store is a bad idea. Besides, the market research reports say America likes crispy cookies, not soft and chewy cookies like you make." -- Response to Debbi Fields' idea of starting Mrs. Fields' Cookies.
  • "We don't like their sound, and guitar music is on the way out." -- Decca Recording Co. rejecting the Beatles, 1962.
  • "Radio has no future. Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. X-rays will prove to be a hoax." -- William Thomson, Lord Kelvin, British scientist, 1899.
  • "So we went to Atari and said, 'Hey, we've got this amazing thing, even built with some of your parts, and what do you think about funding us? Or we'll give it to you. We just want to do it. Pay our salary, we'll come work for you.' And they said, 'No.' So then we went to Hewlett-Packard, and they said, 'Hey, we don't need you. You haven't got through college yet.'" -- Apple Computer Inc. founder Steve Jobs on attempts to get Atari and HP interested in his and Steve Wozniak's personal computer.
  • "If I had thought about it, I wouldn't have done the experiment. The literature was full of examples that said you can't do this." -- Spencer Silver on the work that led to the unique adhesives for 3-M "Post-It" Notepads.
  • "It will be years -- not in my time -- before a woman will become Prime Minister." -- Margaret Thatcher, 1974.
  • "I see no good reasons why the views given in this volume should shock the religious sensibilities of anyone." -- Charles Darwin, The Origin Of Species, 1869.
  • "With over 50 foreign cars already on sale here, the Japanese auto industry isn't likely to carve out a big slice of the U.S. market." -- Business Week, August 2, 1968.
  • "That Professor Goddard with his 'chair' in Clark College and the countenancing of the Smithsonian Institution does not know the relation of action to reaction, and of the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react--to say that would be absurd. Of course, he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools." -- 1921 New York Times editorial about Robert Goddard's revolutionary rocket work. The remark was retracted in the July 17, 1969 issue.
  • "You want to have consistent and uniform muscle development across all of your muscles? It can't be done. It's just a fact of life. You just have to accept inconsistent muscle development as an unalterable condition of weight training." -- Response to Arthur Jones, who solved the "unsolvable" problem by inventing Nautilus.
  • "Ours has been the first, and doubtless to be the last, to visit this profitless locality." -- Lt. Joseph Ives, after visiting the Grand Canyon in 1861.
  • "Drill for oil? You mean drill into the ground to try and find oil? You're crazy." -- Workers whom Edwin L. Drake tried to enlist to his project to drill for oil in 1859.
  • "Stocks have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau." -- Irving Fisher, Professor of Economics, Yale University, 1929.
  • "There is not the slightest indication that nuclear energy will ever be obtainable. It would mean that the atom would have to be shattered at will." -- Albert Einstein, 1932.
  • "The bomb will never go off. I speak as an expert in explosives." -- Admiral William Leahy, U.S. Atomic Bomb Project.
  • "Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value." -- Marechal Ferdinand Foch, Professor of Strategy, Ecole Superieure de Guerre.
  • "There will never be a bigger plane built." -- A Boeing engineer, after the first flight of the 247, a twin engine plane that holds ten people.
  • "Everything that can be invented has been invented." -- Attributed to Charles H. Duell, Commissioner, U.S. Office of Patents, 1899, but known to be an urban legend.
  • "Louis Pasteur's theory of germs is ridiculous fiction." -- Pierre Pachet, Professor of Physiology at Toulouse, 1872.
  • "The abdomen, the chest, and the brain will forever be shut from the intrusion of the wise and humane surgeon." -- Sir John Eric Ericksen, British surgeon, appointed Surgeon-Extraordinary to Queen Victoria 1873.
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

TRANSLATION: "Other people think I'm cool, so there!"

Have you framed them and stuck them on your fridge?

What kind of loser brags about getting PMs?

INTERPRETATION: George Bush thought that Iraq was still in possesion of WMD's and was part of AQ

SUMMATION: There are fools and suckers born everyday
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

"The abdomen, the chest, and the brain will forever be shut from the intrusion of the wise and humane surgeon." -- Sir John Eric Ericksen, British surgeon, appointed Surgeon-Extraordinary to Queen Victoria 1873.


Well, in the long list posted above the only one that is PROVEN correct is the Eric Eriksen statement above. He probably had Gunnar in mind!!!:thumbsu:

No guts, no heart, no brains!!!!!

S. O. R. R. Y. ...V .....P.R.O.O.F! ......it's your choice Gunnar!:D
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

Well, in the long list posted above the only one that is PROVEN correct is the Eric Eriksen statement above. He probably had Gunnar in mind!!!:thumbsu:

No guts, no heart, no brains!!!!!

S. O. R. R. Y. ...V .....P.R.O.O.F! ......it's your choice Gunnar!:D
and you forgot ............... no drugs at West Coast
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

This whole issue of drugs in AFL, and of West Coast supposedly being the worst offenders, is a total beat-up.

Rumour and innuendo are no substitute for real evidence, but that hasn't stopped commentators from inflating this issue at every opportunity.

The Footy Show interview with West Coast chairman Dalton Gooding was presented as some kind of massive expose - maybe I missed it, but was anything actually revealed?

Gooding basically admitted their had been some discipline problems at the club, before saying the club wouldn't tolerate any more stuff-ups and that illicit drugs were unacceptable. What was the big revelation here? What else was he going to say? You'd get the same line on drugs and discipline from every chairman in the league.

This whole saga is marked as a beat-up by the complete lack of real information. I'm yet to see a shred of evidence that there is a "drug problem" in the AFL, or at West Coast or any other club.

Notice the way Hutchison kept referring to "a perception back East" that West Coast had a drug problem. That perception was emphasised because Hutchison had no actual evidence to use as a starting point for his questions. A perception - that's what's driving this beat-up.

I love the way commentators use "anecdotal evidence" to build their case. What does that phrase mean in this context? Rumour? Hearsay? In most reporting, that would not be sufficient to drive a story - but in this issue, that's considered a smoking gun.

Craig Hutchison spuriously linked Cousins getting locked up and Kerr assaulting a taxi driver with a supposed drug problem at West Coast. How does that work? Were drugs a factor in either incident?

Then there's the Fletcher incident. If anyone knows what happened in Las Vegas, then let's hear it. It's unsound to just assume it was a drug overdose in the absence of any real information?

Like I said - show me the evidence. Don't just recite unsubstantiated rumours or point to incidents that had nothing to do with drugs.

Quite frankly, I couldn't care less what Ben Cousins or any other player does or doesn't ingest in a nightclub. I have no interested whatsoever in this half-baked soap opera that surrounds players' off-field activities. The public appetite for this stuff mystifies me.

I thought most people follow football because they like the spectacle and the contest. Players will be judged on what they do on-field - and rightly so. Why is there such interest in everything else?

That said, the way this story about the "drug problem" has been manufactured needs to be pointed out.

People should demand some facts instead of just lapping up innuendo that feeds their dislike of the Eagles.


You want some evidence. How about Ben Cousins in rehab. How about recorded phone calls with Daniel Kerr. How about Fletch in Vegas. Sounds like evidence to me.
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

Anyway this is NOT! made up. Google now, roll up, rollup and see the mind of a looooonatic
http://www.urbandictionary.com/author.php?author=Gunnar+Longshanks
Definitions by Gunnar Longshanks

4.nubilityJan 2, 2007The social class of teenage girls who win status through their blossoming...3.pedophakeJan 2, 2007When someone unwittingly lusts after a young boy/girl without knowing their age...2.splashbackJan 2, 20071. when the water from a toilet or a urinal splashes up or out and wets your...1.Hogan's GapJan 2, 2007The little square gap between the top of some girls' thighs. Most girls...

Wow.... those dyno-fists or whatever it is they self indulgently call one another really do converse learnedly at dinner. Kudos. :thumbsu:
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

This whole issue of drugs in AFL, and of West Coast supposedly being the worst offenders, is a total beat-up.

Rumour and innuendo are no substitute for real evidence, but that hasn't stopped commentators from inflating this issue at every opportunity.

The Footy Show interview with West Coast chairman Dalton Gooding was presented as some kind of massive expose - maybe I missed it, but was anything actually revealed?

Gooding basically admitted their had been some discipline problems at the club, before saying the club wouldn't tolerate any more stuff-ups and that illicit drugs were unacceptable. What was the big revelation here? What else was he going to say? You'd get the same line on drugs and discipline from every chairman in the league.

This whole saga is marked as a beat-up by the complete lack of real information. I'm yet to see a shred of evidence that there is a "drug problem" in the AFL, or at West Coast or any other club.

Notice the way Hutchison kept referring to "a perception back East" that West Coast had a drug problem. That perception was emphasised because Hutchison had no actual evidence to use as a starting point for his questions. A perception - that's what's driving this beat-up.

I love the way commentators use "anecdotal evidence" to build their case. What does that phrase mean in this context? Rumour? Hearsay? In most reporting, that would not be sufficient to drive a story - but in this issue, that's considered a smoking gun.

Craig Hutchison spuriously linked Cousins getting locked up and Kerr assaulting a taxi driver with a supposed drug problem at West Coast. How does that work? Were drugs a factor in either incident?

Then there's the Fletcher incident. If anyone knows what happened in Las Vegas, then let's hear it. It's unsound to just assume it was a drug overdose in the absence of any real information?

Like I said - show me the evidence. Don't just recite unsubstantiated rumours or point to incidents that had nothing to do with drugs.

Quite frankly, I couldn't care less what Ben Cousins or any other player does or doesn't ingest in a nightclub. I have no interested whatsoever in this half-baked soap opera that surrounds players' off-field activities. The public appetite for this stuff mystifies me.

I thought most people follow football because they like the spectacle and the contest. Players will be judged on what they do on-field - and rightly so. Why is there such interest in everything else?

That said, the way this story about the "drug problem" has been manufactured needs to be pointed out.

People should demand some facts instead of just lapping up innuendo that feeds their dislike of the Eagles.
where are you living half the side are on drugs and to say it has no advantage to the players is just ridiculous, they should be stripped of the premiership its just a disgrace !
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

where are you living half the side are on drugs and to say it has no advantage to the players is just ridiculous, they should be stripped of the premiership its just a disgrace !


Gunnar may be in denial about the extent of our illicit drug usage but you my friend are an idiot.

Half the side on drugs - that's 20 players - are you really sure about that???

The drugs in question are not considered performance enhancing unless used on match day to which no player from any club has tested positive.

In short we have some players who have been stupid enough to use illicit drugs which has tarnished not only their own image, but that of the club and the AFL. But these actions had did not give us any on field advantage.
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

I don't have much interest in what they ingest. Gossip about off-field activites is something I've never had much of an appetite for.

That doesn't mean I don't have an opinion on an issue that has received such enormous coverage over the past month or so.

Pfffttt...

They don't "deserve the privilege"?

I didn't realise Judge Judy posted on BigFooty.

Won't somebody please think of the children!
I realise now I,ve wasted my typing ability on a jerk
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

So how's Benny doing? Haven't heard anything about him. I'm figuring he's best mates with Courtney Love, Pete Doherty and Robert Downey jr by now. Bet he'll be having a big party when he gets back.
 
Re: The Great Beat-Up: The Drug Problem at West Coast

What happened to Benny? I heard he went to Tibet to live with the monks :thumbsu:

Where is he and why is he at wherever he is? :thumbsu:




I was gonna join him.................




















And then I got High. :thumbsu:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top