catempire
Premium Platinum
Appropriate this is in the “I was wrong” thread. Just not in a self-aware way!The screw up was twice - once in not backing him in, once in trading him for a pick in the 20s.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Appropriate this is in the “I was wrong” thread. Just not in a self-aware way!The screw up was twice - once in not backing him in, once in trading him for a pick in the 20s.
The screw up was twice - once in not backing him in, once in trading him for a pick in the 20s.
His whole year has been very good. I thought he might have been done too- but there you go- never write off a champion.I will throw in one of my own: I thought Selwood had gone well beyond the point of retirement. Last night showed I was wrong.
Ahh, it's not unreasonable to write off a champion when they're 34His whole year has been very good. I thought he might have been done too- but there you go- never write off a champion.
No doubt he can play.this is the i am wrong thread. Maybe its time to admit we are wrong about clark.
Reality of the situation with Clark was he desperately wanted to go home and his family wanted that as well- big time.No doubt he can play.
Would he have got a regular game under our regime and setup as it stood back when he made his decision to leave?
Notwithstanding the Scarlett stories, I feel that there were other factors in play that we are unaware of.
Maybe application, or ability to perform the roles required? Perhaps he was just impatient. Not everyone is as stoic as Zac Guthrie.
The go home factor and a virtually guaranteed place in the side that were on offer from Freo would have made it hard to keep him onboard.
Good luck to him. He has obviously landed on his feet.
Still grates a bit when I see his name in Freos best…
Haha. Yep- he’s amazing. Not sure if his body is just pretty right after a couple of patchy years, or it’s just his old stalwart -will power. Extraordinary really.Ahh, it's not unreasonable to write off a champion when they're 34
Almost every one of our other 2007-2011 players has been pretty much cooked by 34, bar Enright, Ablett and Hawkins.
No doubt he can play.
Would he have got a regular game under our regime and setup as it stood back when he made his decision to leave?
Notwithstanding the Scarlett stories, I feel that there were other factors in play that we are unaware of.
Maybe application, or ability to perform the roles required? Perhaps he was just impatient. Not everyone is as stoic as Zac Guthrie.
The go home factor and a virtually guaranteed place in the side that were on offer from Freo would have made it hard to keep him onboard.
Good luck to him. He has obviously landed on his feet.
Still grates a bit when I see his name in Freos best…
The screw up was twice - once in not backing him in, once in trading him for a pick in the 20s.
I should be a bit clearer: if we had done the first (played him in the seniors off half-back) then we wouldn't have had to trade him for a pick in the 20s. Once we were into October, yep, we were only getting p22 and fair enough.The second one i disagree strongly...it comes down to 2 things...1. Was he going to ask to go again this year if not best 22? Yes. And 2. Would we have got far less for him in a trade at end 2022? Absolutely yes.
Which is why trading him for 24 and a future 3rd was the right call as it was selling high.
Anything else would have been selling low.
Clark ( who dont wanna be here) become Conway ( who do wanna be here) and Conway fills a bigger list need now than Clark ever could.
Net net its a win for Clark and a win for us.
Im moving on .... ir is this gonna become Caddy like.
GO Catters
You're not alone here. I thought this for much of the first half of the season.I will throw in one of my own: I thought Selwood had gone well beyond the point of retirement. Last night showed I was wrong.
Remember when we drafted him, big get but we’d only have him until 25 due to degenerative kneesYou're not alone here. I thought this for much of the first half of the season.
Bloke's come back with a vengeance.
I'd suggest the club did back him in and gave him opportunities at senior level when his form wasn't exactly warranting of continued selection
At some stage though he needed to take that next step, and play at a level where he wasn't in the omission discussion - he did that in his first season, but he didn't perform at a high level on a consistent basis across seasons 2 & 3, making it an easy choice for the MC to look at other players
As for the trade deal, here's the main question from that - if instead of receiving pick 22 in the trade for Clark, we negotiated to get Fremantle's pick 19 instead, would we have still selected Conway or one of the 3 players taken before we called out Toby's name?
Sure, pick 19 sounds better on paper - but if we're just going to use that selection on the same player we call out 3 names later, is it really worth stressing over or calling the deal a stuff up?
Still would have been worth it. Last 11 years have been cream. Incredible.Remember when we drafted him, big get but we’d only have him until 25 due to degenerative knees
Great story from Lingy on the club podcast this week about when the skipper came down to training at the Cattery (as part of the AFL Academy) in the early stages of 2006. After a couple of days, a number of players went to Wellsy and told him you have to do whatever you can to get this bloke. He already looked like he was part of the group and it was as if he had been around the place for several years.Still would have been worth it. Last 11 years have been cream. Incredible.
I should be a bit clearer: if we had done the first (played him in the seniors off half-back) then we wouldn't have had to trade him for a pick in the 20s. Once we were into October, yep, we were only getting p22 and fair enough.