The Inevitable War - Keating goes bang

Remove this Banner Ad

A few days ago our government announced the most significant shift in Australian strategic defence policy in our history.

And in response yet another idiotic trope being dished up by the mainstream media instead of informed rational discussion.


View attachment 1630548


A reminder that Ben Fordham (2GB) is an employee of the Nine entertainment Co. - the same organisation that owns the Age and Sydney Morning Herald.

And it's not just Keating, MediaWatch and a host of proper journalists who are calling out Costello's Nine Entertainment Group for its ignorant cheersquad reporting.

Crikey is reporting that The SMH/Age 'War with China is Inevitable' reporting has stirred criticism from staff within the organisation itself: some say worthy subject matter was let down by poor reporting; others say it should never have made it into print.

I’ve got no sympathy for anyone who takes a pay packet from news corp or 9… they can all rot in hell.
 
The Ukraine war is an example of the Russian people not standing up to a power mad leader warmongering in another country.

It's the equivalent of Americans and Australians not standing up enough to their own power mad leaders over Iraq, and a potential war with China.
Except in Australia and America we can vote out any actual power mad leaders.

China, Iraq and Russia on the other hand.....

There's a quality to democracy which should be acknowledged and a problem with totalitarianism which should not be ignored.
 
Except in Australia and America we can vote out any actual power mad leaders.

Unless the corporate control of the media and influence of lobbyists have denigrated political culture to the point where both major parties are solely influenced by the military industrial warmonger lobby. The last time Australia had a genuine chance for a peaceful government was early 2000s Labor, and in the US late 70s Carter. Both were derided as weak and cowards at the time, and ever right leaning "left wing" parties now trip over themselves to more war hungry.

Democracy didn't cause Australia not join in multiple overseas illegal wars over the past decades, and China's system didn't lead them to invade other nations.

Your argument is pointless.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

A few days ago our government announced the most significant shift in Australian strategic defence policy in our history.

And in response yet another idiotic trope being dished up by the mainstream media instead of informed rational discussion.


View attachment 1630548


A reminder that Ben Fordham (2GB) is an employee of the Nine entertainment Co. - the same organisation that owns the Age and Sydney Morning Herald.

And it's not just Keating, MediaWatch and a host of proper journalists who are calling out Costello's Nine Entertainment Group for its ignorant cheersquad reporting.

Crikey is reporting that The SMH/Age 'War with China is Inevitable' reporting has stirred criticism from staff within the organisation itself: some say worthy subject matter was let down by poor reporting; others say it should never have made it into print.

Seen this ****head on my Twitter feed a bit recently, he’s no better than Tucker imo
 
Brilliant from Keating and a whack to our politicians. When asked what did he think impact his comments would have on his relationship with the ALP, he said country before Party. Both sides of politics have failed us with this s**t deal.

Loved his comments about the UK abandoning us and we come crawling back.

Unfortunately all the discussion today is about Keating vs Albo, "internal ALP strife".

It's about Keating vs "journalists" - "unfair criticism"

It's about Keating being on a bank's board 5 years ago "still a CCP suckhole"

But it's not about the very pertinent and pressing points Keating made about the idiocy of the AUKUS deal and our approach to China. As usual the media is going after fluff and ignoring the real issue.
 
Unfortunately all the discussion today is about Keating vs Albo, "internal ALP strife".

It's about Keating vs "journalists" - "unfair criticism"

It's about Keating being on a bank's board 5 years ago "still a CCP suckhole"

But it's not about the very pertinent and pressing points Keating made about the idiocy of the AUKUS deal and our approach to China. As usual the media is going after fluff and ignoring the real issue.

And nor is it about the strangle hold the corporate owned world intelligence community has…
We are now controlled by the faceless…
 
Except in Australia and America we can vote out any actual power mad leaders.

China, Iraq and Russia on the other hand.....

There's a quality to democracy which should be acknowledged and a problem with totalitarianism which should not be ignored.

Do you honestly think the US is a democracy?

China does actually vote for regional representatives … they do have elections.
The CCP is basically a large commitee.
 

Check it out, people listen.
Wow, 11% of 1%, that's nearly a whole retirement village worth of listeners.

Honestly, it's a very narrow target audience for radio, Fordham is much like Tucker in that he tells the listeners what they want to hear, and he was chosen for the job because of it.
 
Do you honestly think the US is a democracy?

China does actually vote for regional representatives … they do have elections.
The CCP is basically a large commitee.
OK, now I've heard everything. Xi is the elected head of a large committee. He's practically the head of the Kinder committee.

Meanwhile, the USA is not a democracy (I would agree it's a form of oligarchy/democracy with a dash of theocracy, just like Australia), but no democracy has or ever will be pure or perfect.

Which one out of China and the USA do you think is more democratic?
 
Wow, 11% of 1%, that's nearly a whole retirement village worth of listeners.

Honestly, it's a very narrow target audience for radio, Fordham is much like Tucker in that he tells the listeners what they want to hear, and he was chosen for the job because of it.



11% of 1%. What 1%?
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Tucker Carlson.

Admits to just telling his viewers what they want to hear because it will boost ratings (eve if it's lies he doesn't believe).

Which is fine for entertainment, just don't also pretend to be "news".

Here?
 
OK, now I've heard everything. Xi is the elected head of a large committee. He's practically the head of the Kinder committee.

Meanwhile, the USA is not a democracy (I would agree it's a form of oligarchy/democracy with a dash of theocracy, just like Australia), but no democracy has or ever will be pure or perfect.

Which one out of China and the USA do you think is more democratic?
China has elections … that’s fact. It’s not disputable… it’s debatable on how fair that system is. But the fact is the Chinese system grows and changes…

Is the US version of democracy your bench mark?


I judge a country a little bit differently … and it’s on how they are building their society…

One country is bringing millions out of poverty.
One country is putting millions into poverty and at the same time trying to drag other nations with them, whilst proping up multinationals in a corrupt Ponzi scheme that has no regard for its people.
 
China has elections … that’s fact. It’s not disputable… it’s debatable on how fair that system is. But the fact is the Chinese system grows and changes…
Scam elections, ask the HK democratically elected officials who aren't CCP aligned what happened to them.

You are mistaking broken democratic system (America) with sham election systems (China), US may be broken beyond repair, but at least it is still a democracy
 
Scam elections, ask the HK democratically elected officials who aren't CCP aligned what happened to them.

You are mistaking broken democratic system (America) with sham election systems (China), US may be broken beyond repair, but at least it is still a democracy

I’m confused with your point?

Democracy has completely failed in the US .. but Atleast they can still vote? And that means it’s better?
 
I’m confused with your point?

Democracy has completely failed in the US .. but Atleast they can still vote? And that means it’s better?
In what way has democracy completely failed in the US? They're the richest nation in the world. They're still near-top in nearly every metric (except education), so they're stupid but still rich. Even if it's a bit (increasingly) unequal.

And as far as global security goes, considering the awesome power available to them, they've been relatively benign in world history.

Meanwhile, the top echelons of the CCP and NCP have been cleansed of opposition factions and Xi rules China with an iron fist and unquestioningly. They renegged on their deal with Britain over Hong Kong and essentially sank Hong Kong's real estate and banking sectors and Hong Kong is now a province of China losing all of its value as well as their freedoms.

It also doesn't even matter if the USA is good or bad, the question is about China, which has acted belligerently to all of its neighbours, who then invite US bases and then the Chinese say they're being provoked. Sounds awfully familiar again, doesn't it.



Keating is simply wrong about China. The benefits to the globe of brining Chinese people out of poverty through international trade have not been matched with internal reforms which ensure benefits to the inhabitants of China. They're not as bad as Russia.....yet..... but they soon will be.
 
In what way has democracy completely failed in the US? They're the richest nation in the world. They're still near-top in nearly every metric (except education), so they're stupid but still rich. Even if it's a bit (increasingly) unequal.

And as far as global security goes, considering the awesome power available to them, they've been relatively benign in world history.

Meanwhile, the top echelons of the CCP and NCP have been cleansed of opposition factions and Xi rules China with an iron fist and unquestioningly. They renegged on their deal with Britain over Hong Kong and essentially sank Hong Kong's real estate and banking sectors and Hong Kong is now a province of China losing all of its value as well as their freedoms.

It also doesn't even matter if the USA is good or bad, the question is about China, which has acted belligerently to all of its neighbours, who then invite US bases and then the Chinese say they're being provoked. Sounds awfully familiar again, doesn't it.



Keating is simply wrong about China. The benefits to the globe of brining Chinese people out of poverty through international trade have not been matched with internal reforms which ensure benefits to the inhabitants of China. They're not as bad as Russia.....yet..... but they soon will be.

More dribble … have you lived in HK?

Do you understand the agreement between the UK and China over the reunification?
 
I’m confused with your point?

Democracy has completely failed in the US .. but Atleast they can still vote? And that means it’s better?

My point cannot be clearer, now you're just being deliberately obtuse

Saying "China has elections" is like saying Crimea democratically annexed themselves from Ukraine

More dribble … have you lived in HK?

Do you understand the agreement between the UK and China over the reunification?

I was born there, what's your credentials, big man? Put your medals on the table if you're gonna shill so openly
 
Last edited:
More dribble … have you lived in HK?

Do you understand the agreement between the UK and China over the reunification?
Well, according to the UK and G7, China is breaking the agreement.

According to China, there's no such agreement or obligation (see quote in article). So, since you mentioned that there's an agreement, you don't align with the CCP's view of things.


China obviously cannot be trusted.

I'm not saying that to say that they'll invade Australia, I'm saying that because they're adjacent to trade partners which account for 50% of our trade and that the region should be prepared to push back on the ongoing Chinese expansionism so that our trade partners can buy our grain, food and iron ore for infrastructure rather than buying US missiles and ammunition.
 
Wow, 11% of 1%, that's nearly a whole retirement village worth of listeners.

Honestly, it's a very narrow target audience for radio, Fordham is much like Tucker in that he tells the listeners what they want to hear, and he was chosen for the job because of it.
Who did he replace? Tells a fair bit about his credentials
 
Shinzo Abe and Xi were close. Trump’s Tariff’s brought Japan and China closer. They have island disputes, but every nation in the region has those. Arguably Japan-South Korea relations are arguably worse, but no one suggests a Japan-South Korea war is imminent.

If you read the history of the rape of Nanking then you’ll realise it’s actually China which has the main grievance with Japan, not the other way around.
Japan approves of our plan to buy nucs btw
 
Unless the corporate control of the media and influence of lobbyists have denigrated political culture to the point where both major parties are solely influenced by the military industrial warmonger lobby. The last time Australia had a genuine chance for a peaceful government was early 2000s Labor, and in the US late 70s Carter. Both were derided as weak and cowards at the time, and ever right leaning "left wing" parties now trip over themselves to more war hungry.

Democracy didn't cause Australia not join in multiple overseas illegal wars over the past decades, and China's system didn't lead them to invade other nations.

Your argument is pointless.
You keep saying they dont invade other countries.

You keep being wrong about that.

Chinas invasion of vietnam:


70FEA938-3A02-4F3A-949A-C2FFB97C116E.jpeg
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The Inevitable War - Keating goes bang

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top