
Outrageous?
We will not win a game in May.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Supercoach Rd 22 - The FINALS SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC - BigFooty Cup - Semi Finals - Last Coach Standing - Five Remain! ,//, AFLW Fantasy 2025! ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 22 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Captains/VCs
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Outrageous?
We will not win a game in May.
Ok I got one.
Geelong will get a higher average output in full games played from 26 year old 178cm Shaun Mannagh than Collingwood will get from 26 year old 178cm Lachie Schulz.
Could be a substantial backfire in this for those playing at home
Too late to be outrageous.TDK is better than SDK.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You're not very good at this game.TDK is better than SDK.
Vdubs I love your work, but seriously I don't think you should be allowed to play this game.Hawkins to retire at the bye.
Dubs is truly one of the greats of this board. But it is true that any outrageous claims attributable to him are just going to reach a whole different world of 'Wow!' when compared to most of us mere mortals on here.Vdubs I love your work, but seriously I don't think you should be allowed to play this game.
The trouble is that he's 1 for 1 so far and I feel like allowing a free rein to his outrageous pessimistic predictions in this thread can only end up with disastrous consequences for everyone.Dubs is truly one of the greats of this board. But it is true that any outrageous claims attributable to him are just going to reach a whole different world of 'Wow!' when compared to most of us mere mortals on here.
you attribute more power to me than deservedThe trouble is that he's 1 for 1 so far and I feel like allowing a free rein to his outrageous pessimistic predictions in this thread can only end up with disastrous consequences for everyone.
I'm with you here. You and I both lived long enough to finally see '07 and recognise that no words anyone speaks (and no dread anyone feels) has actually ever changed the result of a single sporting contest.you attribute more power to me than deserved
Rohan returning to his old contesting/harassing (which was mostly missing in his other games) had more to do with it.O.Henry subbed out our season is back on track
I think it's ridiculous that Managh is not playing and think he would easily match Schultz output.
I have nothing against Neale who is bobbing up here and there as a key forward with little AFL experience.I think it's ridiculous that Managh is not playing and think he would easily match Schultz output.
Rohan returning to his old contesting/harassing (which was mostly missing in his other games) had more to do with it.
But this is a coaching thing. Henry's form has dipped but it looks like it has dipped with a) our ball movement being terrible and b) stacking the side with too many tall forwards.
It seems Scott is willing to sacrifice having Henry at his best by squeezing both Rohan and Neale into the side. Surely it is Neale that would make way when we are at full strength.
Yeah I sort of agree with a lot of this. He has to hone in on those other parts of his game to become a complete player. He's a top 10 player in the league for goals/assists aged 21 when ball movement is strong. But when it's not, it's easy to see his deficiencies.It is not a matter of form, as a forward he doesn't have the capability to be more than a mark on lead player, if he plays tall then we can't target him 1 on 1 in a neutral setting he gets beaten too much nor does he create space by movement the best he can do is bring it to ground, if he plays small he doesn't gather the ball enough or apply real pressure. Either way we're a player down.
If Henry could do either role then the MC wouldn't be considering Neale or especially Rohan. The smaller you can be while remaining structurally sound the better it is. Adding the extra tall robbed him of his identity.
Good players create opportunities he is almost entirely reliant on the good work of others to get into games. If he needs our team to have good ball movement then he isn't much use. Good forwards make what would otherwise be poor ball movement work.
I think he'll eventually make the switch to play up the ground, mimicking the Wood, Mayne move to the wing where he'll have space to work into.
He needs to actually play for me to get this correct though. Unless he does I only have one full game of output to go off.I think it's ridiculous that Managh is not playing and think he would easily match Schultz output.
Neale is being groomed rapidly for the Hawkins roleIt is not a matter of form, as a forward he doesn't have the capability to be more than a mark on lead player, if he plays tall then we can't target him 1 on 1 in a neutral setting he gets beaten too much nor does he create space by movement the best he can do is bring it to ground, if he plays small he doesn't gather the ball enough or apply real pressure. Either way we're a player down.
If Henry could do either role then the MC wouldn't be considering Neale or especially Rohan. The smaller you can be while remaining structurally sound the better it is. Adding the extra tall robbed him of his identity.
Good players create opportunities he is almost entirely reliant on the good work of others to get into games. If he needs our team to have good ball movement then he isn't much use. Good forwards make what would otherwise be poor ball movement work.
I think he'll eventually make the switch to play up the ground, mimicking the Wood, Mayne move to the wing where he'll have space to work into.
That's the worry for me. I think we're a better functioning forward line without Neale and Henry but Rd 1 next year both will be playing. How much investment do we need now?Neale is being groomed rapidly for the Hawkins role
Rohan and Hawkins will be gone next year anyway
Disagree. OH is a productive HFF who has so much potential. We should be pleased he's on our list.That's the worry for me. I think we're a better functioning forward line without Neale and Henry but Rd 1 next year both will be playing. How much investment do we need now?
Ahhh that word Potential... plenty of players have it.Disagree. OH is a productive HFF who has so much potential. We will b e pleased he's on our list.