UpTheTigs
Club Legend
Agreed but Tom's not a particularly prolific contested mark
Only led the AFL in contested marks in 2016...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Agreed but Tom's not a particularly prolific contested mark
Only led the AFL in contested marks in 2016...
100% correct on all fronts.
May I make comment that Unions are there to protect workers rights but are dangerous when trying to run the company. Re Dangerfield trying to campaign for shorter and less games. Let’s see what the tv company’s and sponsors think of that! Maybe he will have to reduce his pay at the same scale the games are reduced by.
Sorry, comment proberley belongs in another thread.
I agree completely with you. The amounts allegedly offered to Lynch are ridiculous. Unfortunately we have a track record of making ridiculous offers and being financially irresponsible.
For example, NM offered Greenwood $330,000 for 2 years when he had one good season out of 7. We came over the top and offered $450,000 for 4 years. Kangaroos offered Wells one year at $350,000. We came in and offered $550,000 with no clauses for 3 years despite Wells well known chronic injuries. Fremantle offer Mayne 2 years at $300,000, we come in and offer $500,000 for 4 years. Tom Lynch averages 15 games per season and 9 kicks per game over his 8 seasons to date and a well documented history of knee problems. We have allegedly come over the top again with the biggest offer. I believe he would improve our list but not for the amount we would have to pay him.
On a side note I read today that contract talks with Tom Langdon have stalled and that both parties are a fair distance away.
He looked fantastic last week but I think the jury is still out. For me he is fringe. The club appear to think he is best 22 but he is behind Dunne, Shaz, Howe and a fit Moore. Fantastic one out but needs to improve decision making and execution under pressure.No. He's clearly best 22. Get a clue.
They rushed him back into the team last year, that should tell you where he sits with the coaches, and the game or two he missed this year our defense look bog ordinary, not enough credit given to himHe looked fantastic last week but I think the jury is still out. For me he is fringe. The club appear to think he is best 22 but he is behind Dunne, Shaz, Howe and a fit Moore. Fantastic one out but needs to improve decision making and execution under pressure.
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
We have a history on this board of being financially irresponsible. We read rumoured figures from a media that we regularly ridicule for inaccuracy in all matters of trade and then we treat these rumoured figures as proven facts.I agree completely with you. The amounts allegedly offered to Lynch are ridiculous. Unfortunately we have a track record of making ridiculous offers and being financially irresponsible.
For example, NM offered Greenwood $330,000 for 2 years when he had one good season out of 7. We came over the top and offered $450,000 for 4 years. Kangaroos offered Wells one year at $350,000. We came in and offered $550,000 with no clauses for 3 years despite Wells well known chronic injuries. Fremantle offer Mayne 2 years at $300,000, we come in and offer $500,000 for 4 years. Tom Lynch averages 15 games per season and 9 kicks per game over his 8 seasons to date and a well documented history of knee problems. We have allegedly come over the top again with the biggest offer. I believe he would improve our list but not for the amount we would have to pay him.
On a side note I read today that contract talks with Tom Langdon have stalled and that both parties are a fair distance away.
The amount of time the club has put into Langdon, it’s absurd to think the club will get rid of a key player like him. Played 41 of a possible 44 games in his first 2 seasons and only missing games since then through injury and he was smashing it in the vfl to get his recall to the seniors. He ain’t leaving.
Where’d you hear 700k?But what if he's asking for 700k a year?
There's always a limit to a players worth, and list/cap management decisions need to be made.
I want to keep Langdon, but he's not a JDG-level irreplaceable player.
Usually helps.
Crows had Walker, McGovern and Lynch in their forward line last year and were smashed.
Tom Lynch not Tom Langdon but get how some people could get confused on this Mensa site!
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Fair enough. I don't know what the coaches want from him in respect to structure and possitioning. But he is very iffy under pressure. As I said, was fantastic last week and if he can continue with that sort of form will be a real asset for us.They rushed him back into the team last year, that should tell you where he sits with the coaches, and the game or two he missed this year our defense look bog ordinary, not enough credit given to him
Free agency was forced upon the AFL by the players union. (Note not “association” because it’s actually a union)
They threatened legal action based on restraint of trade, which they would have won easily.
The AFL doesn’t want free agency. It stuffs up their drafting plan, designed to rotate the clubs through a cycle of success and failure.
Everyone gets a ribbon.
Offer a rookie spotWhy get lynch when Nathan Freeman could be on the table?!
If the scribes know where he's going (eg Tiges) then we're safe to assume his manager has let the two unsuccessful clubs know so that they can get on with their other trading (they might even want one of the managers "other" players), so......
If say The Pies and the Hawks know that Tom's Tiger bound....why aren't we seeing the "Pies out of race" headlines? Surely if we knew as a club (and the industry sources suggest that we would) then why aren't we seeing any of these headlines? Or simply Clarko or Bucks saying "We're moving onto Shiel now!!"
Makes me think....