My intel is that it was a toss up between Brander and Oscar at 13. So when Oscar was still there at 21, like a 19 year old with a hard on, we could not help ourselves having both.
I thought Brander would turn into our CHB and Oscar our CHF.
So in a perfect world, Oscar Kelly and Ryan with our first 3 picks would have made a serious change in future list management. Kelly may have also added to our 2018 strength.
Here’s the but. I did not see the immediate impact that both Kelly and Ryan would bring. If we are honest, I believe very few saw Tim doing in 2018 what he did when arriving at the Cattery. I suspect we had drafting regrets with Kelly which is why it became more emotive in getting him to the club and we paid overs.
I think the other part to the trade was that we offered big $$$ for Kelly. Having done that, the draft capital to get him was probably aligned. I suspect Kelly taken at 21 would not have seen such a high salary in 2020 etc and we would be seeing a $500k to $600k at there about player and not a $750k to $800k player.
Our big dollar pointy end signings in 2018/19 of Guv, Kelly and Gaff are starting to bite us.
Oh well, the Brander draft decision opens up so many could have been scenarios
Question for posters- would you have wanted
1) Brander at 13, Allen at 21 and Ryan at 26
Or
2) Brander at 13, Kelly at 21 and Ryan at 26?
Without Oscar, would Brander have been given more opportunities?
Pre-draft talk on here was that Kelly would be available at our later picks (32/34) and Ryan even later than that.
#13 Brander, #21 Allen, #26 Kelly, #32 Ryan should have happened if the dick eaters didn't jump in.