Society & Culture Things in life you just don't understand

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not enforcing a follow on when 398 ahead on the first innings.

Mental (and physical) degredation?

There's only a few days between tests - if follow-on enforced, our bowlers could be on-field for two full days - very hard to backup from. Watson, Harris pretty fragile at best of times. Johnson was flying, but the rest were ineffectual, bowling to the tail, with the opposition on the ropes. If Johnson fatigued (from what I saw was already happening), the chance was England could be 0-100 at stumps, and whilst not back in this game, mentally back on par with our bowlers.

By not following and likely delaying a declaration we essentially avoid the possibility of losing. With 180 overs to go, and reasonable weather, i wouldn't mind seeing us bat until just before tea - as much to unsettle the openers "preparing to bat" psyche, as to give their bowlers the maximum time in the field.
 
Okay, so here's one:

"There's more than one way to skin a cat".

Er, well...yes. I'm sure there is, you rampant sicko. But who skins cats, let alone looks for more than way one to do it?



So really, where does such a bizarre saying come from? What are its origins?

Its origins lie in taxidermy. People who found that their living room actually did not have "enough room to swing a cat". They then had poor Tiddles stuffed and mounted after the said cat's skull burst on impact with the walls.
This requires skinning the remains.

Why these people were swinging their cats around without first checking the dimensions of the room I cannot say.

p.s. Sometimes I go on random rants with no facts included.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Mental (and physical) degredation?

There's only a few days between tests - if follow-on enforced, our bowlers could be on-field for two full days - very hard to backup from. Watson, Harris pretty fragile at best of times. Johnson was flying, but the rest were ineffectual, bowling to the tail, with the opposition on the ropes. If Johnson fatigued (from what I saw was already happening), the chance was England could be 0-100 at stumps, and whilst not back in this game, mentally back on par with our bowlers.

By not following and likely delaying a declaration we essentially avoid the possibility of losing. With 180 overs to go, and reasonable weather, i wouldn't mind seeing us bat until just before tea - as much to unsettle the openers "preparing to bat" psyche, as to give their bowlers the maximum time in the field.

Fair comments.

My point is probably moot as we're already wooping their sorry arses today.
 
I don't understand Christmas movies where the parents don't believe in Santa, and the kids prove to them that he is real (The Santa Clause, Miracle on 34th St etc.). In these movies, where santa is real, why do the parents not believe in him? Who the hell do they think is leaving presents for their kids? :confused:o_O
Well they most likely buy most of the presents that are sitting under the tree and only a select few are from Santa. When it comes to opening the ones from him, each parent would think the other must've bought that gift and so never question it.
 
I dno. I don't understand.
Pescitarians eat fish, but no other meats. Vegans don't eat meat or any animal byproducts, ie. milk, cheese, gelatin. Actually most proper vegetarians try to avoid gelatin, as far as I know.

The thing I understand most is that the less meat they eat, the more is left for me to eat :thumbsu:
 
Sorry, I meant that eating fish was vegetarian, because I think someone who eats fish but not meat is still considered vegetarian.

And that there would be confusion if the person said they were vegan.

My bad, I worded it quite confusing.
 
Sorry, I meant that eating fish was vegetarian, because I think someone who eats fish but not meat is still considered vegetarian.

And that there would be confusion if the person said they were vegan.

My bad, I worded it quite confusing.


If they eat fish and call themselves a vegetarian, they are wrong. They are a pescitarian. It's a bit pedantic, but technically that's what they are.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If they eat fish and call themselves a vegetarian, they are wrong. They are a pescitarian. It's a bit pedantic, but technically that's what they are.

So a vegetarian is someone who doesn't eat meat, fish but eats animal products?
 
5cf.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top