Thread hijacked, don’t bother entering unless you want to be bored by repetition.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I enjoyed that bit.

It's a real thing, that Qld 'go ahead spirit', best exemplified by the Fitzgerald inquiry.

Australian athletes have had too much smoke blown up them for so many years, they have lost whatever sense of perspective they ever possessed in the first place.
I like the idea of Queensland doing it proper Queensland style.

" Good to see ya. The tracks over there. The dunnies out the back. Watch out for the redbacks and snakes."
 
I enjoyed that bit.

It's a real thing, that Qld 'go ahead spirit', best exemplified by the Fitzgerald inquiry.

Australian athletes have had too much smoke blown up them for so many years, they have lost whatever sense of perspective they ever possessed in the first place.

Truth is, they do “go ahead”, but then Nick/Pendles/Checkers/Nick/Jordy and they ain’t ahead no more…
 

Log in to remove this ad.

That is cause for increased optimism, I hope something material comes of it.

EDIT: If this is what we’re congratulating Albanese and Wong on, you’ll forgive me if I contain my exuberance.

 
Last edited:
FFS.
Do the Victorian police understand what their job actually is?
This is Australia. And the right to protest is a core of what Australia is. We would still be In Vietnam if not for protest.
While I don’t agree with the protesters on this issue, I fully defend their right to protest.
And for the police to complain about having to deploy resources is to misunderstand what they are paid to do.


The police want the protesters to apply for permits. As one protest organiser said “how do we apply to protest against the government who are issuing the permits”?
Just keep your mouths shut and do what you are paid to do
 
FFS.
Do the Victorian police understand what their job actually is?
This is Australia. And the right to protest is a core of what Australia is. We would still be In Vietnam if not for protest.
While I don’t agree with the protesters on this issue, I fully defend their right to protest.
And for the police to complain about having to deploy resources is to misunderstand what they are paid to do.


The police want the protesters to apply for permits. As one protest organiser said “how do we apply to protest against the government who are issuing the permits”?
Just keep your mouths shut and do what you are paid to do
We probably don't agree on much. But this is exactly right. Our freedoms are being eroded one by one & nobody seems to care.
Probably 80% of protest marches I don't really agree with. But rights are rights & they must be fought for & defended
 
Hey, Voldemort, time you put the big boy pants on.
Here’s a chance for you to stand up and do something to make our lives better.
Instead of trying to score politic points, how about you apportion the blame for the released detainees where it belongs?
The bloody courts
Courts let them free, and now when the transgress, the courts grant them bail!
Time for both sides to get together and start making the courts reflect the wishes of the population.
 
D-Day for Assange, I think it’s 99% likely that the UK kowtows to the US’s demands after they provided their glib assurances that Julian will not receive the death penalty and can basically try his hand at claiming protection under the first amendment like the US citizen they’re effectively trying him as (in the sense that he’s never been to the US but is being charged with breaking US law).

I hold out very little hope, short of an expedited appeal to the ECHR.

Fingers crossed I’m just being pessimistic and the UK really does have a backbone and some morals.
 
Bloody Morrison.

The Age

OPINION

Page 97 of the budget kept me awake at night, and is a stain on Morrison’s legacy​

Shane Wright

Shane Wright

Senior economics correspondent
May 20, 2024 — 3.50pm
Save

There are tens of thousands of pages to the federal budget. But a single paragraph on page 97, which could easily have been missed,demands to be read and understood by all Australians.
It shows a decision by the Albanese government to fix a situation left by their predecessors that is beyond comprehension, and a stain on the Morrison government’s legacy.

The paragraph reveals an extra $6.5 billion going to defence veterans over the next five years, which the government says is “largely due to more claims being processed because of increased staffing levels”, and which “results in increased payments to veterans”.
I’ve covered every budget since Peter Costello handed down his “back in black” budget of 1998. Normally, I sleep well after them. But that one sentence kept me awake for days, thinking about the veterans left without proper support, about my own relatives and friends who served their country and how we got to a position where a government has to spend so much money to rectify a problem not of its own making.

This $6.5 billion funding allocation is an indictment against the Morrison government, the backstory to it enough to make your blood boil.
In 2018, Scott Morrison said he understood “first-hand the battles so many veterans face when they leave the defence forces”, and argued that as a nation, more could always be done to recognise the men and women who had served in uniform. Unfortunately, that didn’t extend to processing veterans’ entitlement claims.
By April 2023, the average processing time for a veteran’s claim was 435 days, while 36,271 claims – almost half of those lodged – hadn’t even been looked at (known as “unallocated” cases).
This was a known and growing issue for the Coalition. In March 2022, ahead of Josh Frydenberg’s final budget, then veterans affairs minister Andrew Gee threatened to resign unless extra money was put aside to clear the backlog, which at the time was around 60,000 unallocated cases.
That was 60,000 veterans, partners or widows of people who had served in the Australian forces waiting for someone to start looking at their claim for financial support.

Within the veterans’ community, the term “delay, deny, die” is used to describe the system. It means if a government delays the start of processing a claim, and then denies the initial claim, the veteran is likely to have died before they are finally paid what they are owed.

It’s hard to know what’s worse – that veterans have coined a term for this situation or that many believe it is a deliberate choice by government.
Gee’s 2022 threat seemingly touched a nerve, and he was promised an additional 90 departmental employees to deal with the backlog. The 90 extra staff barely touched the sides.

The incoming Labor government, including new Veterans Affairs Minister Matt Keogh, quickly realised the disaster left by the previous bunch and confidentially talked to veterans affairs ministers going all way the way back to the Rudd government to understand what he had been handed.

In the October 2022 budget, handed down just five months after Labor took over from the Coalition, Treasurer Jim Chalmers allocated funding for a further 500 employees, and last week, funding for an extra 141 staff was allocated to make sure claims are processed, and so that our veterans can start getting their entitlements.
This goes to the heart of the problem left by the Morrison government.
To save costs across a number of sectors, including Veterans Affairs, it used labour hire companies and short-term employment contracts in favour of permanent employees. But one of the biggest problems with this model is that staff barely stay long enough to remember their logon details before their contract is up.
In Veterans Affairs, it takes up to six months to train the specialist staff responsible for overseeing claims. And so, the previous government’s use of labour hire ended up being a disaster for the department and veterans.
Unsurprisingly, the department has become more efficient since switching back to public service employees. The backlog of number of unallocated cases has reduced to just 2569 and the processing wait time, while still far too long, has dropped by 62 days.

What’s truly outrageous is not just that these claims took so long to be processed, but that this $6.5 billion would have left the government’s coffers long ago and already be in the pockets of our veterans had the system not been in such a poor condition.

Yet even in light of this, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton complained last week that the number of public servants has swelled under the Albanese government, declaring the Coalition sees defence spending as “much more of a priority than office staff in Canberra”.

What Dutton seemingly failed to appreciate, though, is that hundreds of those staff in Canberra are the ones looking after the veterans who were left unsupported by his former boss.

There are 20,000 veterans out of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan alone. This isn’t an issue that’s going away, and the claims coming forward show more veterans are now suffering multiple problems, ranging from post-traumatic stress to physical injuries.

Keogh, Chalmers and Finance Minister Katy Gallagher are still a way from fixing all the problems within Veterans Affairs. But clearing this backlog is a major step in the right direction. They’ve done it without fanfare. And they’ve made a conscious decision not to overtly politicise a situation which was an absolute mess and ripe for point scoring and public criticism.
 
Assange has been granted the right to an appeal, specifically on the grounds that he risks being discriminated against on the basis of his nationality, i.e. that as a non-US citizen he won’t be afforded the ability to claim protection under the first amendment (this is also essentially true of charges under the Espionage Act).
 
Now reading that he has been granted a full appeal, which if true is a vastly better outcome, as he could raise new evidence, for example the revelations that Pompeo tried to have him assassinated while in the Ecuadorian embassy.
 
Now reading that he has been granted a full appeal, which if true is a vastly better outcome, as he could raise new evidence, for example the revelations that Pompeo tried to have him assassinated while in the Ecuadorian embassy.

lucky julian.....he get's to stay in his majesty's jail for the full appeal....i think the US will be happy with that.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

lucky julian.....he get's to stay in his majesty's jail for the full appeal....i think the US will be happy with that.

No doubt!

I really hope it is a full appeal though.

Much better chance of Biden dropping the charges if Assange can introduce the assassination plot into evidence, it would be deeply embarrassing for the US government.
 
No doubt!

I really hope it is a full appeal though.

Much better chance of Biden dropping the charges if Assange can introduce the assassination plot into evidence, it would be deeply embarrassing for the US government.

the prosecution will probably call various australian PM's and foreign ministers to give evidence against Assange. John Howard will probably volunteer and Morrison will be hoping to extend his networking in the US.
 
I find it interesting to read a wave of negative publicity in regards to EVs. Not a lot is new, especially the questions around just how 'green' EVs are. I get the news cycle is positive one day, negative the next but just wonder if something bigger is in play. Personally, I always saw EVs as transforming environmental concern into a consumer item so the big players can rake it in but where to now? Is this about killing the market before China takes control? If so why not focus on solar as well? Some hidden power games at play here.
 
Reasons to never vote Labor ever again. Never ever (#964): The Fictive NACC
The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) has decided not to pursue a case against the flotsam who were referred to it by the 'Robodebt' Royal Commission.

Because you know...not in the public interest and...the Royal Commission kinda covered it, and...um, we think that the RC did a cool job and could we really do more?

Nup. Cos we're toofless. Built to fail.

Oh that Mr Dreyfus, he's so swanky and suave.

 
Reasons to never vote Labor ever again. Never ever (#964): The Fictive NACC
The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) has decided not to pursue a case against the flotsam who were referred to it by the 'Robodebt' Royal Commission.

Because you know...not in the public interest and...the Royal Commission kinda covered it, and...um, we think that the RC did a cool job and could we really do more?

Nup. Cos we're toofless. Built to fail.

Oh that Mr Dreyfus, he's so swanky and suave.



was it corruption or sheer incompetence? and if public officials are found to have done something wrong, wouldnt you expect them to try to cover it up or to blame someone else? I'm not sure that we arent the ones to blame to have expectations that they would govern adequately.
 
I find it interesting to read a wave of negative publicity in regards to EVs. Not a lot is new, especially the questions around just how 'green' EVs are. I get the news cycle is positive one day, negative the next but just wonder if something bigger is in play. Personally, I always saw EVs as transforming environmental concern into a consumer item so the big players can rake it in but where to now? Is this about killing the market before China takes control? If so why not focus on solar as well? Some hidden power games at play here.

We have to rape the environment for batteries in order to reduce emissions. That's just where we're out as we're not going to reduce consumption. Negative stories about Evs? I'd take that as one part old industries looking to maintain their share and one part fear of China.
 
interesting initiative by the previous fed govt


it cost $25m to establish....i'm not sure if that included meal allowances and travel allowance. Your taxes at work.
 
adelaide casino gets fined $70m for money laundering ...no word of anyone going to jail. I remember the casino in WA got a similar thing. Industry run by crooks for crooks supported by.a system that doesn't include this behaviour as being criminal. Do corporates ever go to jail?

I hope cops have the resources to charge and jail people for taking drugs....
 
adelaide casino gets fined $70m for money laundering ...no word of anyone going to jail. I remember the casino in WA got a similar thing. Industry run by crooks for crooks supported by.a system that doesn't include this behaviour as being criminal. Do corporates ever go to jail?

I hope cops have the resources to charge and jail people for taking drugs....
It was a civil matter Marky. You know the difference right? Not sure AUSTRAC can initiate criminal proceedings. Think they would need State or Federal Police involvement.
 
was it corruption or sheer incompetence? and if public officials are found to have done something wrong, wouldnt you expect them to try to cover it up or to blame someone else? I'm not sure that we arent the ones to blame to have expectations that they would govern adequately.
Not corruption, because no one was lining their back pockets.
Certainly incompetence.
Which makes you wonder.
Shouldn’t the original post be “reasons not to vote Coalition ever, ever, ever again part #26,982”?
 
adelaide casino gets fined $70m for money laundering ...no word of anyone going to jail. I remember the casino in WA got a similar thing. Industry run by crooks for crooks supported by.a system that doesn't include this behaviour as being criminal. Do corporates ever go to jail?

I hope cops have the resources to charge and jail people for taking drugs....
I think just about every casino in Australia has been found guilty of money laundering.
Certainly Crown and Star.
Now SA and I think you’re right about WA.
How they can be found to be “fit and proper” to hold licences, all of them, is staggering.
Still, anyone who gambles truly doesn’t understand that the house never loses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top