Why replace him if he's under contract? Just don't trade him. Your point is redundant.
No it's not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Why replace him if he's under contract? Just don't trade him. Your point is redundant.
No it's not.
Only the most ridiculously one eyed twit would ever accuse Sydney of not dealing fairly with Adelaide.
Made up stories, speculation, whinging, sooking...it has been endless with this simple trade.
All thats happened is that Tippett wanted out...not even contracted. He tells his club he's going then does the right thing and doesnt dutch auction himself and simply nominates a club that has made him an offer.
Who the hell wants to keep a bloke who doesnt want to be at your club...stop ya sooking and hypocritical contrived garbage looking for sympathy and get on with it.
You've got some very nice value out of good relationship with Sydney in the past...even just last year.
Short bloody memories some of these ones.
Ohh woe is me...wont somebody please help save us from the injustices in this world.
Yes, it is. Why would he have even signed an extension on his contract if he really didn't want to be at Sydney? Sydney traded him because they saw an opportunity to turn one player into two.
Brilliant answer. Then why trade him if he's under contract and you don't want to lose him?No it's not.
I dont bother with bandwagoners. Go learn how to troll from some more experienced Adelaide posters.Bollox is an appropriate name, it is all you post.
Let us be honest here Tippett is not going home, home is Gold Coast, he is going for money only, any mention of going home is bullshit and does not factor into the discussion of trading Tippett to Sydney so comparisons to players who wanted to "go home" are irrelevant.
I dont bother with bandwagoners. Go learn how to troll from some more experienced Adelaide posters.
All thats happened is that Tippett wanted out...not even contracted. He tells his club he's going then does the right thing and doesnt dutch auction himself and simply nominates a club that has made him an offer...thats the way it should be so that Adelaide arnt fart arsing about with tyre kickers...its the way it invariably is with just about every trade when a player asks for a move.
Ok...so you also want all the out of contract players wanting to leave to fore go their futures and simply announce "i'm off...no idea where...but i'm heading off"Tippett deciding on one club in one city with a strong bargaining position is the worst outcome for Adelaide.
Adelaide would get a better deal if Tippett just wanted to move to NSW, Qld or NSW/Qld.
Regardless of your opinion of Tippett you can't paint him as looking out for his former club and keep a straight face.
You try losing 3 KPP's to huge money in as many years and receive **** all in return for them, and then get back to us.
Piss off.
Ball wont get down there.