Play Nice Tippett Nominates Sydney - Part II

Remove this Banner Ad

That would explain why Sydney had just re-signed him for two years before Adelaide spent all of trade week needling for him.

We can't get in the ear of a contracted player and convince him to leave - you put him on the table in a trade you initiated by tapping up one of our out of contract players.

It's not like we were going to say 'Here's Armstrong, take it or LJ will walk to the PSD'. No-one would stoop that low.

If you were so desperate to keep LJ, why did you put him on the trade table after you resigned him? What magical blackmail card did we play to force you to part with him? Maybe Steven Trigg's wife worked as the PA to his manager?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You traded out LJ because he didn't fit into your infamous and inflexible 'culture'.... but only after you'd spent the year in Armstrong and Walker's ears telling them to come to Sydney and be anonymous. And we gave you Armstrong, 35, and 68 in the deal.

Now you've thrown the culture out the window by trading for the biggest mirror-polisher in the game and everyone can see that your 'fair trader' reputation is a complete smoke-screen, and your club is only good at poaching. What did you give St. Kilda for Tommy Walsh last year by the way, if you are so fair and measured as traders?

You traded the two picks we gave you for Johnston to steal a player from under another clubs nose. Without us playing our part - FAIRLY - in a deal that you orchestrated by tapping up our player, you wouldn't have been able to go and steal someone else's lollipops.

Now **** off back to Paddo and eat a bag of dicks.
Pity nobody at Adelaide shares your view...not the club nor even the fans.
They even like to Quote young Lewis for reality and accuracy ...makes for better reading than your pathetic pebble throwing.
Have a quick read of what Lewis actually said when drafted, as quoted by an Adelaide fan. He was more than a little keen to go home at the first chance too.
Based on the childish rubbish Adleaide have been dishing up re Tippett, you;d be reaching for the shotgun after him.
Thanx for your valuable input :thumbsu:
"I wanted to stay in Adelaide at first so I was a little devastated when the Crows didn't take me with pick 10, but I was just excited to be drafted and was looking forward to the challenges ahead."

So maybe another homesick lad. But then again, didn't he just sign a two year extension?

Yes they always sign extensions knowing they just dont fit in :thumbsu:
 
Yeah you can. In any case, read through that thread where all those quotes came from. Updates from faith saying Adelaide were pushing for Johnston.
Whom you obviously rated as so untouchable you traded him for Armstrong and steak knives out of pure fear he would stand out of the game and not honour his contract, such was his desire to move back to Adelaide after recently signing a new contract?
 
Pity nobody at Adelaide shares your view...not the club nor even the fans.
They even like to Quote young Lewis for reality and accuracy ...makes for better reading than your pathetic pebble throwing.
Have a quick read of what Lewis actually said, as quoted by an Adelaide fan.
Thanx for your valuable input :thumbsu:


Yes they always sign extensions knowing they just dont fit in :thumbsu:
Perhaps he decided that a club who offers a two year extension and then puts you on the trade table for a fringe half-back isn't as attractive an option as you first thought.......
 
That would explain why Sydney had just re-signed him for two years before Adelaide spent all of trade week needling for him.

So, why did Sydney trade him then, seeing as he was contracted?

And for the record, we offered Armstrong a contract, so I'm not sure why people were saying he was going to be delisted.
 
So, why did Sydney trade him then, seeing as he was contracted?

And for the record, we offered Armstrong a contract, so I'm not sure why people were saying he was going to be delisted.

Well, you see, just like with Jolly we wanted to help him get where he wanted to be with a minimum of fuss.
 
Well, you see, just like with Jolly we wanted to help him get where he wanted to be with a minimum of fuss.
Or you needed the picks we were offering so you could sneak Walsh out from under St. Kilda's nose and threw LJ in to get it done knowing you had someone lined up to take his place.

But no, no, please keep going with this fantasy of how we tapped up a freshly contracted player that had no way of joining us other than you trading him, purely out of the goodness of your hearts, and not in any way so you could finalise poaching one of our players and snaffle one from the Saints as well.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Or you needed the picks we were offering so you could sneak Walsh out from under St. Kilda's nose and threw LJ in to get it done knowing you had someone lined up to take his place.

But no, no, please keep going with this fantasy of how we tapped up a freshly contracted player that had no way of joining us other than you trading him, purely out of the goodness of your hearts, and not in any way so you could finalise poaching one of our players and snaffle one from the Saints as well.

How dare we try to replace a young forward with a young forward. Anything else?
 
You work on that "perhaps" stuff.
We'll work on reality thanks.
Dont bother trying to get my attention again with your 12yo trolling.

When you open the other eye and stop complaining you'll realise that Sydney have been rather generous of late and perhaps, just perhaps the AFC know this, and the guys that matter from both clubs dont have such short memories.
If you want to troll, at least do yourself the courtesy of executing it properly.

Maybe there is a sub-board on the Sydney forum you could practice on. I would suggest the Bay but you don't appear to have the aptitude for the amount of research required.
 
I'd be more concerned about why my club is making guy who wants to be elsewhere, our highest paid player.

I'd be equally as concerned about my club, which prides itself on its culture, making a new guy who has had nothing to do with its success the highest paid player on its list.
 
what if you highest paid player strung your club along for 3 years, made them look like absolute fools after deciding on a totally different club, in turn screwing the club that put so much time and effort into him, and have his manager come out and try to make sydney be nice and make sure everything went fine and dandy.

would you be alright with that and be willing to make sure everything went smoothly?
 
what if you highest paid player strung your club along for 3 years, made them look like absolute fools after deciding on a totally different club, in turn screwing the club that put so much time and effort into him, and have his manager come out and try to make sydney be nice and make sure everything went fine and dandy.

would you be alright with that and be willing to make sure everything went smoothly?

No, and I never suggested I would be.
 
Im amazed at how many pages this has got. Hoepfully this crap ends soon. :p

Likewise. The Adelaide supporters haven't been painting a pretty picture of themselves throughout this whole saga. I hope it's sorted soon so they can save some face a bit once it quietens down.
 
I'd be equally as concerned about my club, which prides itself on its culture, making a new guy who has had nothing to do with its success the highest paid player on its list.

If he is the highest paid, that's the name of the game when it comes to getting a quality KPF in this league. When luring a player you always need to offer more than what they could get somewhere else, no one just leaves for sun and surf.

Tippett isn't worth 800K-1M per year, but the success he could possibly bring to the club is and that's why it's a risk worth taking. He might well be a dud for the next 6 years or so, but we won't find out by paying him unders.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Tippett Nominates Sydney - Part II

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top