Once again, a transcript that purports to be funny, but also has a hidden subtext of probably being what actually happened...
God I hope not, but yes,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Once again, a transcript that purports to be funny, but also has a hidden subtext of probably being what actually happened...
Lol, this is the best line. Looking forward to the next installment.Trigg: Pardon? Pardon? (agitated voice) le phone est kaput Day-veed, au revoir, le batterie is mort …….beeeep. (hangs up, disconnected signal)
To be continued………
Yep, has to be and especially the short time span the posts were generated.Just quietly this has to be some sort of BF record. 17,800 posts.
Ironically that probably all Tippett deserved too.This thread deserves 20k.
That's about another 8000 postsWhich will come first? This thread reaching 1,000 pages or Tippett selected in the Draft/PSD?
The Ron Burgandy thing didnt give it away?
I think the best part for me is at least KT won't go end up at Sydney.
Hey do you think that we can redraft him?
Gentlemen's agreements, side deals, "understandings" and secret extra payments to contracts are rife within the AFL, senior club figures have revealed.
The key is to keep it vague and not put anything in writing.
The administrators, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said it was common for clubs to agree that they would endeavour to help a player move back to his home state at the end of his contract - should he so desire.
Clubs also made assertions they would help out with the players' leadership training, work outside of the game and other similar incentives that could sway them to remain with the club.
The main thing was not to put it in writing.
Read more: http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-premiership/commonplace-for-afl-clubs-to-make-secret-deals-with-players-senior-club-figures-reveal/story-e6frf3e3-1226504640183#ixzz2AXNL8ULN
I agree that he is more likely than not to end up at Sydney, however I can not see how the afl can or would limit what he can earn. I also can't imagine the aflpa allowing it. I think that would be to make sure that there were no restrictive clauses in it to frighten away other teams.
I reckon he's still more likely to end up at Sydney than not. If you were framing a betting market, Swans would still be in the lead. Especially if you read Blight's and Vossie's comments here: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/crows-face-draft-restrictions-blight/story-e6frf9io-1226504523745
This comment in Quayle's article today:"Any decision reached by Tippett must be approved by the AFL - including any salary terms that he nominates" suggests that the AFL may prohibit Tippett from placing a huge salary figure on his head, and may result in other teams re-considering drafting him. (http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/crows-must-cast-off-one-more-for-tippett-20121027-28cmg.html#ixzz2AXCIHRYT). The major point of this article, however, was that Tippett must remain on our list for now. And if he doesn't nominate for the National Draft (Sydney are preferring he nominates for the Pre-Season Draft), he must stay on our list which means we will need to delist a player (Crouch, according to Quayle, does not count as a 'selection') to ensure that we make the mandatory three selections at the National Draft. I can see us maybe delisting Tambling (or whoever) and then re-drafting him back.
Personally, I don't give a stuff where Tippett ends up. I'm over it. He wouldn't be the first player to walk out on a club (without the club receiving compensation) and he certainly won't be the last. And, I've actually already geared myself up to us taking on Sydney with Tippett rather than without next season (any suspension he is dealt may rule this out). We may have lost a final to Sydney this year, but I always feel confident playing against them (22 wins v 11 losses record).
Agree totally with Alex here and any avoidance of resignations or sackings even without any draft reprisals knowledge is totally dis respectful to team and supporters who at the least lose 2 top picks or ability to get a quality player at the minimum.I don't think we'll ever find out, but I'd love to hear from John Reid, Steven Trigg or even the Tippett camp how they expected to trade Tippett for a 2nd round pick and get away with it?
If he was as good as they were predicting to give him that contract, a 2nd round pick was never going to cut it.
And if he (the Tippett camp) insisted on a trade to the club of his choice, why they thought he would stay. Were they that stupid?
All round, it's a total stuff up and I'd love to know how anyone that incompetent can possibly expect to keep there job?
ADELAIDE will have to cut another player from its senior list should Kurt Tippett try to join Sydney through the pre-season draft as expected.
The Crows have been told they cannot delist Tippett after next week's first list lodgement deadline, pending the AFL's investigation into its recontracting of him in 2009.
.....The club must make three mandatory selections at the November 22 draft and free an extra pick for Brad Crouch, chosen in last year's 17-year-old mini-draft. Crouch does not count as one of the compulsory three picks.
Where is Pyro Crow? We are going to stage a burning! The burning of the Bigun![]()
According to The Age we'll need to delist another player because Tippett will need to remain on our books past the first list lodgement process, though it's not clear if this would be the case if the investigation is finished before the second list lodgement.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...for-tippett-20121027-28cmg.html#ixzz2ApoCfrK4
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...for-tippett-20121027-28cmg.html#ixzz2ApoCfrK4