- Aug 11, 2008
- 3,602
- 1,445
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Wrong. Nothing in the rule book setting a penalty for intentional/careless.
Not true. A finding of careless rather than intentional would've been a fine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Wrong. Nothing in the rule book setting a penalty for intentional/careless.
Wild imaginationsLOL!
His eye socket bends out of shape you utter dill.
Well considering the charge was contact to the eye region and the video evidence appears to show this happening, one is rather intrigued to find out what the basis of their appeal will be, because they can only appeal on the basis that the decision was fundamentally excessive for the offence or there was some kind of error of law.Clear contact with the eye there but those in denial in this thread will tell you that it never happened.
This “grub” as you like to say hasn’t been convicted of eye gouging like Carlton great Brendan Fevola.OK.
I was there.
When he went for Neale - late into the tackle and snaked his hands to Neale's face - there was a huge uproar. It was obvious on the screens at the ground.
This grub should not be playing professional sport.
Wild imaginations
Stop this "inconclusive vision" lie. The initial footage was inconclusive but the footage shown on 360 last night was %100 conclusive, unless you're blind, biased, or you're looking at it on a tiny iphone screen.
You can clearly see him claw at Neale's eyes. There's no question;
Erv reperted u Fur going off 2picThis “grub” as you like to say hasn’t been convicted of eye gouging like Carlton great Brendan Fevola.
Nor has he taken revenge pr0n pics of Lara Bingle, like Brendan Fevola (thank god he did it before it was a law, right!!)
pi**ing on a window, embarrassing his captain on TV...
Jesus, you’d think you’d look up to
Him a moral pillar compared to the grade-a grubs that have graced Carlton over the years.
How old are you? I'm not trying to be a smart arse. Just this use to happen all the time players lying to protect the accused. Noone wants to be a snitchIf Neale claims he didn't have his eye gouged then how can Greene still be suspended? What does Neale get out of lying to the tribunal about such a matter?
Was he charged under 21.2.2 a(ix)? He could have been charged with 21.2.2 b which would mean that whether it is intentional or careless is not a factor in their decision.
It seemed intentional to me anyway.
#WHATABOUTFEV !!!!This “grub” as you like to say hasn’t been convicted of eye gouging like Carlton great Brendan Fevola.
Nor has he taken revenge pr0n pics of Lara Bingle, like Brendan Fevola (thank god he did it before it was a law, right!!)
pi**ing on a window, embarrassing his captain on TV...
Jesus, you’d think you’d look up to
Him a moral pillar compared to the grade-a grubs that have graced Carlton over the years.
Verbal evidence vs. video footage? Ok.
And you didn’t.
Faux tough-man tactics cost you 6 points. Lost by 3....And you’ve been crying salty tears directed at Toby the last 72 hours.
You see tonight’s result as some kind of victory. You didn’t win s**t, chump.
Your boys are on day 3 of their mad Monday bender still getting pingaz from Claye Beames at the Rocklea Hotel.
We’re playing a Prelim.
Redirect your salty tears away from the river systems, our farmers are struggling enough.
#TOBYSDIGITSHAVESELFDETERMINISM
Charismatic?? Lol.Looking forward to seeing Toby kick 6 next time the Giants play The Dogs. Wouldn't miss it for the world, very rarely have I seen one group of supporters being blatantly triggered to meltdowns like The Dogs and Greene (probably Carlton fans and Darren Milburn was the last time tbh)
He is now officially one of my top 5 favourite non Carlton players in the league, it's great for the league having a charismatic villain like him in the game
Too many vanilla/boring personalities in the game these days.
Nah.Looking forward to seeing Toby kick 6 next time the Giants play The Dogs. Wouldn't miss it for the world, very rarely have I seen one group of supporters being blatantly triggered to meltdowns like The Dogs and Greene (probably Carlton fans and Darren Milburn was the last time tbh)
He is now officially one of my top 5 favourite non Carlton players in the league, it's great for the league having a charismatic villain like him in the game
Too many vanilla/boring personalities in the game these days.
I'd say Greene's defence tried to get it downgraded to careless for a reason.
From the tribunal recap:
Anderson says there is insufficient evidence that there is contact to the eye region. If I am wrong about that ... and there was some contact to the eye region, then it was careless.
congrats on the most gutless Big Footy troll of the year. Full of BS when you thought he was getting off then run and hide when the verdict comes down. I guess in your own words "Salt alert if incoming Greene case to be upheld. lol."Its happening.