Lol f1 and f2 is considered bending over now?
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Confirmed Tom Barrass & 2025 F4 (WCE) traded to Hawthorn for 2025 F1, F2 & F3 (all Haw)
- Thread starter TiAn_
- Start date
- Tagged users None
You would just trade it next year for points like Brisbane are doing. Or use it to move up in front of a bid.
- Apr 1, 2013
- 2,452
- 5,092
- AFL Club
- West Coast
We’ll be trading F1 out. Probably for Baker but suspect we try to get back in this year or trade it for Warner/Someone else next year if not.
- Mar 19, 2020
- 16,438
- 46,408
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Why are WC fans so delusional? You want Baker, plus something as a sweetener. F1 FOR baker is would be fair value (?), you now have a f2 to go with Baker. What's the issue?
If you didn't want Baker then I could see your point but WC want/chased him, so
If you didn't want Baker then I could see your point but WC want/chased him, so
You know Battle is shorter than Patrick Cripps, right?
He's going to struggle against the truly big forwards, which is why Hawks are chasing Barrass so hard
Because they're huffing the Vic media Kool aid.
Baker only nominated a club after McQualter was appointed.Why are WC fans so delusional? You want Baker, plus something as a sweetener. F1 FOR baker is would be fair value (?), you now have a f2 to go with Baker. What's the issue?
If you didn't want Baker then I could see your point but WC want/chased him, so
He didn't nominate WCE weeks ago, unlike Barrass with Hawthorn.
It doesn't matter about that my point is you get him and f2? What is the issue? You PERSONALLY don't want him, that's your issue with YOUR club, doesn't make the trade not fair value...
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
yes because we can’t form our own opinions, luckily West Australian media is nothing but the gold standard of impartiality
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
We wouldn’t trade 14 and our F2. What makes people think we will do two firsts now?
- Mar 19, 2020
- 16,438
- 46,408
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Because you now have a extra 2nd round pick that you didn't have ?We wouldn’t trade 14 and our F2. What makes people think we will do two firsts now?
Not hard to figure that out
Of course it's the point.
Hawthorn spent months chasing Barrass, with your coach flying to Perth to convince him to move.
Baker simply nominated WA, then only chose WCE after his mate was appointed.
I'm sure the club would love to have Baker but they're not going to turn Barrass, a premier key defender, into Baker, a dime a dozen flanker
I'm sure a deal gets done, it'll just be different to what people originally thought it would look like.
Because you traded out of a draft teams are desperately trying to trade into?We wouldn’t trade 14 and our F2. What makes people think we will do two firsts now?
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
It’s still worse for us? Instead of having an F1 and a 2nd. We would have two future 2nds… it’s objectively worse for us
- Mar 19, 2020
- 16,438
- 46,408
- AFL Club
- West Coast
So you did a trade to get worse and want us to accept that worse offer because that's a trade you did ?
Well, WA media are self-admittedly not draft watchers, at least.yes because we can’t form our own opinions, luckily West Australian media is nothing but the gold standard of impartiality
You won't see suggestions from them along the lines of WCE trading 3 for picks 12 & 14 from Carlton, just to send 12 to Richmond for Baker, like we did with Jay Clark this morning...
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
It’s worse if we trade two firsts… which is why I’m saying it won’t happen
And guess what? Next year's first round is full of academy and father son picks, so heaps of clubs will be looking to trade back so their first rounders don't get eaten up.
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
But you think he does this to favour vic teams, he doesn’t. He is genuinely dumb as bat shit and posts the same rubbish about all teams. He’s not biased, he’s incompetent
- Mar 19, 2020
- 16,438
- 46,408
- AFL Club
- West Coast
We rejected 14... Why would we accept your return for pick 14?
It would have been a 3 way trade in your example...
I get that with him but the earlier posts from Ralph and Morris are indicative of what I'm talking about.
Was hilarious to see the realisation start to come through later in the day though.
Iceman!
Brownlow Medallist
You rejected 14, I’m not saying we won’t trade more than a future first. I’m just saying it can’t be two firsts.
We chased him doesn't automatically make it that we have to pay overs? Do you go into a restaurant you pick and then chef charges you double and you pay up?
Yes, we will trade for him but ain't at the expense of giving you 2 first?
My point I'm making is WC want Baker, we can give you picks to facilitate that move plus a sweetener, that's essentially what Barrass gets for you...anymore and you're being greedy..
- May 28, 2017
- 8,431
- 12,045
- AFL Club
- West Coast
I'd rather keep barrass which forces us to bypass bog average Baker.Why are WC fans so delusional? You want Baker, plus something as a sweetener. F1 FOR baker is would be fair value (?), you now have a f2 to go with Baker. What's the issue?
If you didn't want Baker then I could see your point but WC want/chased him, so
Richmond choking on an endeless supply of a big bag of d1icks is perfectly fine by me
Similar threads
