Most likely.
So, with this year being a “super draft” and next years picks being “undesirable”, it seems that the best thing for WCE to have done was take the pick 14 we originally offered?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most likely.
Popped in to ask this exact question and I think you’ve answered it for me
Surely pick 3 is worth more than what Carlton is offering ?
What’s the general consensus from WC supporters about splitting pick 3 ?
Of course they're being valued at their worst possible position, because we don't know what that position will be, however we did know what 14 was, so WCE can only assume it'll be worst case scenario, because Hawthorn will be better after acquiring Barrass and Carlton are a team that should make finals again, and made a prelim just last year.I love how F1sts are being valued at their worst possible position. They may well be picks in the 20s, but could also be pick 7 and 8 with a couple injuries or a drop off of form. Given the uncertainty, you have to value them where those teams F1sts are currently (12 and 14).
Would I give 12 and 14 for a 25 year old Barrass - pre back problems, yes.
12 and 14 for a 29 year old Barrass - it's not even in the ballpark
And supposedly today it's been reported 14 was never offered to begin with.So, with this year being a “super draft” and next years picks being “undesirable”, it seems that the best thing for WCE to have done was take the pick 14 we originally offered?
Expected value of you and Carltons f1s is in ther pick 13-14 area, for both.I love how F1sts are being valued at their worst possible position. They may well be picks in the 20s, but could also be pick 7 and 8 with a couple injuries or a drop off of form. Given the uncertainty, you have to value them where those teams F1sts are currently (12 and 14).
Would I give 12 and 14 for a 25 year old Barrass - pre back problems, yes.
12 and 14 for a 29 year old Barrass - it's not even in the ballpark
I’m with you thereWe'd burn down Min Res if they even consider the Carlton offer for one second
It's embarrassingly bad and already been rejected on the weekend. Adding Matt Owies doesn't change anything
Of course they're being valued at their worst possible position, because we don't know what that position will be, however we did know what 14 was, so WCE can only assume it'll be worst case scenario, because Hawthorn will be better after acquiring Barrass and Carlton are a team that should make finals again, and made a prelim just last year.
Yes, they certainly may be better than that but next year's first round is already full of academy and father son picks, which we already know.
It's not even close to reasonableExpected value of you and Carltons f1s is in ther pick 13-14 area, for both.
Its a weaker draft than this year, and there are more academy and f/s kids next year. Using the expected values, we can safely assume theyll end up around 18/19.
Package up those 2 picks youll only get up to 12 or 13, obviously depending on the draft, but on an average year it'd be in that ballpark.
Then you have to account for the years delay, thats a negative, lets drop it back 1 pick because of the wait(should move it back more, but ill do you guys a favour) to 13/14 value.
So that values Barrass at 13/14 if you trade your 2 f1s for Barrass with no return.
Thats pretty reasonable, thats around what you guys wanted to offer anyway right?
Therefore Barrass for your 2x f1s with no return is fair.
Hope you can follow
So are you guys off trading pick 14 all of a sudden? You guys were all for it the other dayIt's not even close to reasonable
And supposedly today it's been reported 14 was never offered to begin with.
So for all the melts, perhaps Hawks are simply going about trying to satisfy WCE's demands?
2 F1s is not pick 14. The mental contortions you have performed in your calculations to get there are both impressive and heroic, but won't make 2F1s equal pick 14 this year.So are you guys off trading pick 14 all of a sudden? You guys were all for it the other day
So are you guys off trading pick 14 all of a sudden? You guys were all for it the other day
Supposedly it wasn't offered at all.14 was never offered on its own?
I’ve been busy today, I’ll trust your word, but I find it hard to believe
You're right, better chuck in a second for us also2 F1s is not pick 14. The mental contortions you have performed in your calculations to get there are both impressive and heroic, but won't make 2F1s equal pick 14 this year.
lmao your cooked.Expected value of you and Carltons f1s is in ther pick 13-14 area, for both.
Its a weaker draft than this year, and there are more academy and f/s kids next year. Using the expected values, we can safely assume theyll end up around 18/19.
Package up those 2 picks youll only get up to 12 or 13, obviously depending on the draft, but on an average year it'd be in that ballpark.
Then you have to account for the years delay, thats a negative, lets drop it back 1 pick because of the wait(should move it back more, but ill do you guys a favour) to 13/14 value.
So that values Barrass at 13/14 if you trade your 2 f1s for Barrass with no return.
Thats pretty reasonable, thats around what you guys wanted to offer anyway right?
Therefore Barrass for your 2x f1s with no return is fair.
Hope you can follow
Willing to throw a f3 back14 was never offered on its own?
I’ve been busy today, I’ll trust your word, but I find it hard to believe
Strange that the Eagles will probably be paying Owies more than what they would have been paying Barrass ?!
Explainlmao your cooked.
Yeah, for sure worth more than Lever who was 6 years younger and better...
Lol MM stated himself that he knew a significant would be required ala ppick14. To say it wasn't offered is a lie. WC full of liarsSupposedly it wasn't offered at all.
This is according to Will Schofield, who's close to Barrass.
He's also not a noted newsbreaker, so who knows if it's true or not, but he talked about it on his podcast this morning.
Mate, the math checks out. Tell me where im wrong2 F1s is not pick 14. The mental contortions you have performed in your calculations to get there are both impressive and heroic, but won't make 2F1s equal pick 14 this year.
Out of contract.
There was also pick 10 involved. Hardly same thing mate. Or are you one of these that still thinks a first rounder is same no matter what number it is?
Better is speculative.
Lol MM stated himself that he knew a significant would be required ala ppick14. To say it wasn't offered is a lie. WC full of liars
And Will Day?You're right, better chuck in a second for us also